Lucious
Last seen for girls in 1915 at #4,274 · #4,139 for boys in 2025, 25 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1884 · 20 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,831since 1880
Lucious over time
Rank among boys' names. Lucious has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,139 | 25 | |
| 2024 | — | #4,072 | 26 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,456 | 23 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,464 | 33 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,427 | 33 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,811 | 27 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,636 | 30 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,848 | 42 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,715 | 45 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,412 | 53 | |
| 2015 | — | #3,085 | 37 | |
| 2014 | — | #4,866 | 19 | |
| 2013 | — | #4,621 | 20 | |
| 2012 | — | #4,131 | 24 | |
| 2011 | — | #4,983 | 18 | |
| 2010 | — | #4,099 | 24 | |
| 2009 | — | #4,035 | 25 | |
| 2008 | — | #5,067 | 18 | |
| 2007 | — | #3,591 | 29 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,083 | 35 | |
| 2005 | — | #3,091 | 33 | |
| 2004 | — | #8,143 | 8 | |
| 2003 | — | #5,558 | 13 | |
| 2002 | — | #6,522 | 10 | |
| 2001 | — | #5,142 | 14 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,316 | 10 | |
| 1999 | — | #9,912 | 5 | |
| 1998 | — | #5,840 | 10 | |
| 1997 | — | #5,288 | 11 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,678 | 18 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | #3,030 | 23 | |
| 1993 | — | #5,360 | 10 | |
| 1992 | — | #4,872 | 11 | |
| 1991 | — | #3,224 | 19 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,971 | 14 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,509 | 23 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,072 | 16 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,684 | 19 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,828 | 17 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,706 | 17 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,341 | 21 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,138 | 24 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,284 | 22 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,670 | 34 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,279 | 20 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,008 | 24 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,704 | 29 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,129 | 20 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,736 | 26 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,680 | 27 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,705 | 27 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,794 | 24 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,680 | 24 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,614 | 24 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,364 | 31 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,540 | 25 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,669 | 22 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,510 | 27 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,354 | 33 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,279 | 37 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,279 | 38 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,273 | 38 | |
| 1959 | — | #946 | 66 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,091 | 49 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,075 | 50 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,019 | 54 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,033 | 53 | |
| 1954 | — | #851 | 73 | |
| 1953 | — | #939 | 58 | |
| 1952 | — | #915 | 60 | |
| 1951 | — | #857 | 66 | |
| 1950 | — | #885 | 60 | |
| 1949 | — | #793 | 75 | |
| 1948 | — | #891 | 59 | |
| 1947 | — | #916 | 58 | |
| 1946 | — | #878 | 56 | |
| 1945 | — | #817 | 58 | |
| 1944 | — | #898 | 50 | |
| 1943 | — | #908 | 54 | |
| 1942 | — | #970 | 47 | |
| 1941 | — | #918 | 48 | |
| 1940 | — | #952 | 45 | |
| 1939 | — | #867 | 50 | |
| 1938 | — | #860 | 52 | |
| 1937 | — | #793 | 60 | |
| 1936 | — | #893 | 47 | |
| 1935 | — | #881 | 51 | |
| 1934 | — | #853 | 54 | |
| 1933 | — | #895 | 48 | |
| 1932 | — | #812 | 62 | |
| 1931 | — | #997 | 44 | |
| 1930 | — | #841 | 60 | |
| 1929 | — | #826 | 62 | |
| 1928 | — | #826 | 63 | |
| 1927 | — | #825 | 65 | |
| 1926 | — | #731 | 76 | |
| 1925 | — | #835 | 63 | |
| 1924 | — | #859 | 64 | |
| 1923 | — | #769 | 73 | |
| 1922 | — | #780 | 73 | |
| 1921 | — | #981 | 51 | |
| 1920 | — | #947 | 53 | |
| 1919 | — | #766 | 71 | |
| 1918 | — | #796 | 67 | |
| 1917 | — | #765 | 67 | |
| 1916 | — | #797 | 60 | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #791 | 58 |
| 1914 | — | #645 | 61 | |
| 1913 | — | #720 | 41 | |
| 1912 | — | #668 | 40 | |
| 1911 | — | #707 | 20 | |
| 1910 | — | #492 | 32 | |
| 1909 | — | #505 | 26 | |
| 1908 | — | #632 | 17 | |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #798 | 10 | |
| 1905 | — | #491 | 21 | |
| 1904 | — | #538 | 17 | |
| 1903 | — | #619 | 13 | |
| 1902 | — | #556 | 15 | |
| 1901 | — | #433 | 19 | |
| 1900 | — | #446 | 26 | |
| 1899 | — | #548 | 13 | |
| 1898 | — | #485 | 18 | |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | — | #592 | 13 | |
| 1895 | — | #437 | 20 | |
| 1894 | — | #668 | 10 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #688 | 10 | |
| 1891 | — | #441 | 16 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #525 | 13 | |
| 1888 | — | #580 | 12 | |
| 1887 | — | #438 | 15 | |
| 1886 | — | #431 | 17 | |
| 1885 | — | #577 | 11 | |
| 1884 | — | #399 | 20 | |
| 1883 | — | #597 | 10 | |
| 1882 | — | #437 | 17 | |
| 1881 | — | #416 | 17 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucious was already there! It came in at #600, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1995, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Lucious is popular in 1935
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#229 · 1 in 2,044
- South Carolina#285 · 1 in 2,705
- Alabama#345 · 1 in 3,439
- Mississippi#379 · 1 in 4,077
Best ever in a state: #122 in Georgia, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #229 | 14 | 1 in 2,044 |
| South Carolina | #285 | 7 | 1 in 2,705 |
| Alabama | #345 | 8 | 1 in 3,439 |
| Mississippi | #379 | 5 | 1 in 4,077 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lucious
- 67 spots since 2024 (#4,072 → #4,139)
- 328 spots since 2020 (#3,811 → #4,139)
- 1,054 spots since 2015 (#3,085 → #4,139)
- Biggest jump: 303 spots in 1907 (#798 → #495)
- Biggest drop: 327 spots in 1960 (#946 → #1,273)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1884 at #399 (20 births)
- Births halved by 1892, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 76 yrs · run 1880–1954
- Highest: 1 in 5,604 boys born in 1901 were named Lucious (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 68,323 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #399 in 1884, was only 1 in 5,722 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 13.3% of all boys named Lucious (643) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 142 | #399 (1884) | #500 |
| 1890s | 139 | #437 (1895) | #552 |
| 1900s | 186 | #433 (1901) | #551 |
| 1910s | 517 | #492 (1910) | #715 |
| 1920s | 643 | #731 (1926) | #838 |
| 1930s | 528 | #793 (1937) | #869 |
| 1940s | 550 | #793 (1949) | #894 |
| 1950s | 589 | #851 (1954) | #961 |
| 1960s | 299 | #1,273 (1960) | #1,456 |
| 1970s | 250 | #1,670 (1979) | #1,903 |
| 1980s | 193 | #2,138 (1981) | #2,680 |
| 1990s | 121 | #3,030 (1994) | #5,019 |
| 2000s | 195 | #3,083 (2006) | #5,055 |
| 2010s | 312 | #2,412 (2016) | #3,740 |
| 2020s | 167 | #3,427 (2021) | #3,895 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lucious in 1935
Top boys' names in 1935
More about 1935
boys
1,041,351 boys got a published name in 1935; 1 in 20,419 of them was named Lucious, which outranked 78.8% of the 4,146 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).