Luella

#778 for girls in 2025, 349 births · Last seen for boys in 1929 at #3,959
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 141 births
Debut · girls
111 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
32,605
since 1880

Luella over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Luella has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201940peak #120, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#778349—
2024#823334—
2023#928286—
2022#997262—
2021#923288—
2020#972262—
2019#936282—
2018#953278—
2017#910294—
2016#1,203206—
2015#1,337177—
2014#1,502148—
2013#1,705122—
2012#1,859108—
2011#2,07393—
2010#1,942103—
2009#2,27086—
2008#2,41979—
2007#3,21453—
2006#2,97857—
2005#4,02935—
2004#4,28732—
2003#6,57617—
2002#7,81613—
2001#10,1029—
2000#7,15814—
1999#9,4799—
1998#8,01611—
1997#7,74211—
1996#7,13012—
1995#6,64113—
1994#7,09712—
1993#11,7806—
1992#11,7386—
1991#11,5096—
1990#6,13114—
1989#5,83614—
1988#5,89513—
1987#4,85716—
1986#8,5237—
1985#6,45710—
1984#5,53912—
1983#5,82411—
1982#4,16718—
1981#4,53216—
1980#4,74315—
1979#5,42712—
1978#3,28323—
1977#3,91118—
1976#3,67818—
1975#3,63718—
1974#3,86316—
1973#2,91423—
1972#2,39830—
1971#3,37319—
1970#2,24035—
1969#2,17134—
1968#2,63023—
1967#1,84840—
1966#1,64646—
1965#1,67245—
1964#1,55953—
1963#1,59850—
1962#1,34468—
1961#1,39864—
1960#1,22779—
1959#1,27371—
1958#1,29467—
1957#1,11688—
1956#1,11685—
1955#967105—
1954#965101—
1953#1,00192—
1952#97593—
1951#824118—
1950#768127—
1949#665156—
1948#610183—
1947#672157—
1946#601172—
1945#617139—
1944#538181—
1943#510214—
1942#507216—
1941#447236—
1940#429251—
1939#405276—
1938#392294—
1937#339345—
1936#340338—
1935#333363—
1934#318388—
1933#293428—
1932#279495—
1931#253576—
1930#255597—
1929#241660#3,9595
1928#242662—
1927#242723—
1926#264639—
1925#238761#3,7416
1924#235776—
1923#225821—
1922#222861—
1921#216887—
1920#224852—
1919#205905—
1918#202949—
1917#208842—
1916#210837#3,8975
1915#211783—
1914#210604—
1913#204519—
1912#200483—
1911#205352—
1910#183374—
1909#183325—
1908#177336—
1907#166355—
1906#174291—
1905#178287—
1904#191246—
1903#170286—
1902#176262—
1901#182239—
1900#191268—
1899#174246—
1898#179261—
1897#192206—
1896#180230—
1895#178227—
1894#175228—
1893#179199—
1892#176207—
1891#184163—
1890#175184—
1889#170172—
1888#168171—
1887#178127—
1886#168136—
1885#160131—
1884#139158—
1883#150120—
1882#149117—
1881#120141—
1880#140111—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Luella was already there! It came in at #140, and was given to 111 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1991–1993, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.

Where Luella is popular in 1940

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedNHWashington: #209 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,445 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedIDMontana: #146 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 612 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #121 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 484 girlsNDMinnesota: #171 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,261 girlsMNIllinois: #340 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,751 girlsILWisconsin: #340 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,837 girlsWIMichigan: #248 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,429 girlsMINew York: #574 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 11,214 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedSDIowa: #197 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,517 girlsIAIndiana: #368 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,476 girlsINOhio: #368 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,791 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #569 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,132 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedCONebraska: #187 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,321 girlsNEMissouri: #266 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,151 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: #291 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,367 girlsWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedKSArkansas: #377 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,186 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #362 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,880 girlsOKLouisiana: #474 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,680 girlsLAMississippi: #371 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,230 girlsMSAlabama: #377 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,692 girlsALGeorgia: #505 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,351 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedHITexas: #881 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 12,020 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Luella, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#121 · 1 in 484
  2. Montana#146 · 1 in 612
  3. Minnesota#171 · 1 in 1,261
  4. Nebraska#187 · 1 in 1,321
  5. Iowa#197 · 1 in 1,517

Best ever in a state: #60 in North Dakota, 1935.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#121111 in 484
Montana#14671 in 612
Minnesota#171181 in 1,261
Nebraska#18771 in 1,321
Iowa#197131 in 1,517
Washington#20981 in 1,445
Michigan#248181 in 2,429
Missouri#266131 in 2,151
West Virginia#29181 in 2,367
Illinois#340151 in 3,751
Wisconsin#34051 in 4,837
Oklahoma#36271 in 2,880
Indiana#36861 in 4,476
Ohio#368111 in 4,791
Mississippi#37171 in 3,230
Alabama#37781 in 3,692
Arkansas#37761 in 3,186
Louisiana#47451 in 4,680
Georgia#50551 in 6,351
California#56971 in 7,132
New York#57481 in 11,214
Texas#88151 in 12,020
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luella
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 45 spots since 2024 (#823 → #778)
  • 194 spots since 2020 (#972 → #778)
  • 559 spots since 2015 (#1,337 → #778)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 2017 (#1,203 → #910)
  • Biggest drop: 151 spots in 1952 (#824 → #975)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #120 (141 births)
  • Births halved by 1958, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 84 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1952
Share of babies · girls
1 in 652
  • Highest: 1 in 652 girls born in 1881 were named Luella (0.15%)
  • Latest: 1 in 4,605 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Luella (7,642) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,384#120 (1881)#154
1890s2,151#174 (1899)#179
1900s2,895#166 (1907)#179
1910s6,648#183 (1910)#204
1920s7,642#216 (1921)#235
1930s4,100#253 (1931)#321
1940s1,905#429 (1940)#560
1950s947#768 (1950)#1,030
1960s502#1,227 (1960)#1,709
1970s212#2,240 (1970)#3,472
1980s132#4,167 (1982)#5,637
1990s100#6,131 (1990)#8,726
2000s395#2,270 (2009)#5,085
2010s1,811#910 (2017)#1,442
2020s1,781#778 (2025)#904

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luella in 1940

girls
#429
251 births · 1 in 4,556 girls

Top girls' names in 1940

  1. #1Mary56,216
  2. #2Barbara36,736
  3. #3Patricia32,665
  4. #4Judith22,385
  5. #5Betty22,077
  6. #6Carol21,759
  7. #7Nancy19,737
  8. #8Linda18,370
  9. #9Shirley17,881
  10. #10Sandra16,153
  11. #429Luella251
More about 1940

girls

1,143,528 girls got a published name in 1940; 1 in 4,556 of them was named Luella, which outranked 91.5% of the 5,028 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luella
  1. #426Delia256
  2. #427Leslie254
  3. #427Wendy254
  4. #429Luella251
  5. #429Cornelia251
  6. #431Eugenia250
  7. #432Noreen249
  8. #433Winnie247

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1939
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,494Scarlett#3,429 → #935
  2. ↑ 1,465Lonna#2,206 → #741
  3. ↑ 834Pam#1,797 → #963
  4. ↑ 659Jody#1,638 → #979
  5. ↑ 633Laraine#1,474 → #841
Fallers
  1. ↓ 481Fredia#996 → #1,477
  2. ↓ 430Eleanora#974 → #1,404
  3. ↓ 375Danielle#811 → #1,186
  4. ↓ 342Eloisa#930 → #1,272
  5. ↓ 298Coral#996 → #1,294

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1940 →