Luisa

#902 for girls in 2025, 294 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #5,823
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1882 · 8 births
Debut · girls
8 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
14,372
since 1882

Luisa over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Luisa has never cracked the top 600 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202004peak #678, 1882girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#902294—
2024#865313—
2023#949276—
2022#869319—
2021#987262—
2020#994256—
2019#984262—
2018#1,108222—
2017#1,104228—
2016#1,184211—
2015#1,134224—
2014#1,308181—
2013#1,171205—
2012#1,307180—
2011#1,096224—
2010#1,160209—
2009#1,194210—
2008#1,263198—
2007#1,125230—
2006#996260—
2005#1,054226—
2004#1,008234—
2003#1,029223—
2002#946236—
2001#1,014211—
2000#970218—
1999#865249—
1998#1,018195—
1997#1,110169—
1996#995189—
1995#991189—
1994#1,034178—
1993#1,023180—
1992#1,004188—
1991#1,016181—
1990#968193#5,8238
1989#968180—
1988#1,007162#5,2008
1987#986159—
1986#1,150124—
1985#1,143125—
1984#880171—
1983#1,019138#6,2385
1982#972152—
1981#1,034139—
1980#1,136120—
1979#974147—
1978#1,087120—
1977#1,157108—
1976#1,009124—
1975#1,035116—
1974#1,31581—
1973#1,047111#4,5056
1972#1,12798—
1971#1,148101#4,3756
1970#997125—
1969#1,10999—
1968#1,042100—
1967#1,04697—
1966#999105—
1965#996109—
1964#1,13594—
1963#1,18884—
1962#1,10497—
1961#1,083102—
1960#1,16587—
1959#1,08796—
1958#1,14386—
1957#1,22873—
1956#1,23771—
1955#1,16773—
1954#1,24164—
1953#1,26159—
1952#1,19563—
1951#1,15166—
1950#1,15364—
1949#1,14463—
1948#1,37045—
1947#1,37745—
1946#1,36041—
1945#1,41832—
1944#1,27239—
1943#1,55629—
1942#1,49730—
1941#1,18440—
1940#1,27234—
1939#1,35030—
1938#1,34330—
1937#1,30331—
1936#1,16537—
1935#1,44926—
1934#1,23633—
1933#1,15837—
1932#1,11641—
1931#1,07443—
1930#98356—
1929#1,10744—
1928#88169—
1927#86373—
1926#94263—
1925#1,00855—
1924#82282—
1923#96659—
1922#96959—
1921#86872—
1920#98955—
1919#1,07546—
1918#93758—
1917#1,07943—
1916#1,11440—
1915#1,23132—
1914#1,03433—
1913#1,00329—
1912#97827—
1911#74134—
1910#87724—
1909#1,21912—
1908#82922—
1907#1,09213—
1906#91716—
1905#87218—
1904#91016—
1903#1,07611—
1902#87216—
1901#91813—
1900#1,10612—
1899#93512—
1898#92014—
1897#93112—
1896#99911—
1895#1,2028—
1894#90512—
1893#1,0239—
1892#86112—
1891#1,3325—
1890#87210—
1889#1,1476—
1888#1,1366—
1887#7889—
1886#9936—
1885#9216—
1884——
1883#9205—
1882#6788—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Luisa! It came in at #678, and was given to 8 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Luisa is popular in 2004

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNHWashington: #910 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,756 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,410 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,416 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMINew York: #996 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,929 girlsNYMassachusetts: #534 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,256 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #1,114 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,322 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #622 for girls · 63 births · 1 in 3,632 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedUTColorado: #743 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,116 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedDEArizona: #580 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,869 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: #664 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,424 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Luisa, so not publishedHITexas: #556 for girls · 51 births · 1 in 3,123 girlsTXFlorida: #1,330 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 10,251 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#534 · 1 in 3,256
  2. Texas#556 · 1 in 3,123
  3. Arizona#580 · 1 in 2,869
  4. California#622 · 1 in 3,632
  5. South Carolina#664 · 1 in 3,424

Best ever in a state: #94 in New Mexico, 1916.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#53491 in 3,256
Texas#556511 in 3,123
Arizona#580121 in 2,869
California#622631 in 3,632
South Carolina#66451 in 3,424
Colorado#74361 in 4,116
Washington#91051 in 5,756
New York#996141 in 6,929
New Jersey#1,11451 in 8,322
Florida#1,33081 in 10,251
Illinois#1,41061 in 11,416
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luisa
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 37 spots since 2024 (#865 → #902)
  • 92 spots since 2020 (#994 → #902)
  • 232 spots since 2015 (#1,134 → #902)
  • Biggest jump: 471 spots in 1892 (#1,332 → #861)
  • Biggest drop: 460 spots in 1891 (#872 → #1,332)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1882 at #678 (8 births)
  • Births halved by 1884, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 53 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 2019–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,141
  • Highest: 1 in 5,141 girls born in 2022 were named Luisa (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 5,467 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #678 in 1882, was only 1 in 13,481 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 15.6% of all girls named Luisa (2,246) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s46#678 (1882)#940
1890s105#861 (1892)#998
1900s149#829 (1908)#981
1910s366#741 (1911)#1,007
1920s631#822 (1924)#942
1930s364#983 (1930)#1,218
1940s398#1,144 (1949)#1,345
1950s715#1,087 (1959)#1,186
1960s974#996 (1965)#1,087
1970s1,131#974 (1979)#1,090
1980s1,470#880 (1984)#1,030
1990s1,911#865 (1999)#1,002
2000s2,246#946 (2002)#1,060
2010s2,146#984 (2019)#1,156
2020s1,720#865 (2024)#928

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luisa in 2004

girls
#1,008
234 births · 1 in 7,847 girls

Top girls' names in 2004

  1. #1Emily25,042
  2. #2Emma21,625
  3. #3Madison20,628
  4. #4Olivia16,108
  5. #5Hannah15,614
  6. #6Abigail15,436
  7. #7Isabella15,021
  8. #8Ashley14,377
  9. #9Samantha13,786
  10. #10Elizabeth13,577
  11. #1,008Luisa234
More about 2004

girls

1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 7,847 of them was named Luisa, which outranked 94.6% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luisa
  1. #1,003Kaylen235
  2. #1,003Silvia235
  3. #1,003Trisha235
  4. #1,008Luisa234
  5. #1,008Beatrice234
  6. #1,008Gabriel234
  7. #1,008Janya234
  8. #1,014Kinley233
  9. #1,015Alexandrea232
  10. #1,015Bryana232

Tied with 5 names at #1,008; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2003
Risers
  1. ↑ 948Rubi#1,561 → #613
  2. ↑ 607Kaydence#984 → #377
  3. ↑ 548Marin#1,383 → #835
  4. ↑ 543Diya#1,416 → #873
  5. ↑ 479Kadence#869 → #390
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,607Arly#949 → #2,556
  2. ↓ 433Shakira#747 → #1,180
  3. ↓ 414Anais#990 → #1,404
  4. ↓ 365Lisbeth#742 → #1,107
  5. ↓ 274Reanna#990 → #1,264

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2004 →