Luke

#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #33 for boys in 2025, 6,948 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2014 · 10,523 births
Debut · boys
43 births
In top 100 · boys
36 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
323,020
since 1880

Luke over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201944peak #28, 2014boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#10,1079#336,948
2024#12,1617#347,062
2023—#317,251
2022#12,2437#347,393
2021#12,2067#327,711
2020#13,4536#317,784
2019#9,73610#328,442
2018#10,5459#308,624
2017#14,1246#309,224
2016#9,41111#2910,001
2015#11,8358#2810,294
2014#8,48513#2810,523
2013#16,5475#349,588
2012#12,1998#379,022
2011#12,1538#398,706
2010#14,9596#418,850
2009—#478,625
2008#10,08411#439,424
2007#13,9247#469,609
2006#8,71513#4310,087
2005#7,13816#4110,011
2004#3,89836#419,598
2003#7,20715#469,304
2002#10,2469#468,692
2001#6,61916#508,008
2000#15,0315#597,148
1999#7,71612#676,137
1998#9,2609#755,284
1997#9,8028#784,953
1996#11,8076#755,017
1995#11,7836#824,629
1994#7,60411#914,095
1993#7,49811#874,357
1992#6,65213#934,066
1991#7,98710#1133,013
1990#10,1937#1182,883
1989#9,6817#1212,712
1988#3,89323#1192,619
1987#4,85716#1112,592
1986#4,96415#1062,654
1985#4,12619#1062,741
1984#3,42324#1102,471
1983#3,43123#1052,655
1982#4,02519#1192,478
1981#5,88511#1003,013
1980#3,71921#973,109
1979#5,75111#1102,470
1978#5,95810#1391,882
1977#9,6525#1901,242
1976—#223913
1975—#256778
1974—#265725
1973—#285633
1972#8,2925#319575
1971#5,5439#347530
1970#7,0706#351535
1969—#367451
1968—#396387
1967—#409346
1966—#398355
1965—#392400
1964—#374445
1963—#386422
1962—#392426
1961—#393413
1960—#383426
1959—#424353
1958—#429337
1957—#452291
1956—#486245
1955—#500219
1954—#516197
1953—#544169
1952—#556158
1951—#525169
1950—#514170
1949—#533155
1948—#532155
1947—#548151
1946—#562130
1945—#554116
1944—#559118
1943—#565126
1942—#598110
1941—#535121
1940—#545116
1939—#533116
1938—#522123
1937—#547113
1936—#529116
1935—#525121
1934—#530122
1933—#543110
1932—#438165
1931—#474142
1930—#503141
1929—#474153
1928—#495149
1927—#481158
1926—#472162
1925—#467165
1924—#424206
1923—#449185
1922—#440190
1921—#476165
1920—#472166
1919—#459165
1918—#447176
1917—#443163
1916—#411183
1915—#432157
1914—#365168
1913—#402115
1912—#42883
1911—#34962
1910—#29171
1909—#30257
1908—#30352
1907—#31845
1906—#26157
1905—#27053
1904—#31240
1903—#27346
1902—#29941
1901—#28437
1900—#24370
1899—#29435
1898—#30738
1897—#26344
1896—#27045
1895—#24553
1894—#30832
1893—#25548
1892—#27942
1891—#35923
1890—#26842
1889—#24444
1888—#26245
1887—#23047
1886—#23550
1885—#23350
1884—#27139
1883—#26338
1882—#25844
1881—#23742
1880—#25243
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Luke was already there! It came in at #252, and was given to 43 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 24 boys a year got the name.

Where Luke is popular in 1944

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMINew York: #375 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 9,183 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #374 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 9,297 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #353 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,663 boysNCSouth Carolina: #290 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,985 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #377 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,855 boysLAMississippi: #315 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,392 boysMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedALGeorgia: #336 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,051 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedHITexas: #611 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 7,888 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. South Carolina#290 · 1 in 2,985
  2. Mississippi#315 · 1 in 3,392
  3. Georgia#336 · 1 in 4,051
  4. North Carolina#353 · 1 in 4,663
  5. Pennsylvania#374 · 1 in 9,297

Best ever in a state: #4 in Louisiana, 2022.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#29081 in 2,985
Mississippi#31571 in 3,392
Georgia#33691 in 4,051
North Carolina#35391 in 4,663
Pennsylvania#37491 in 9,297
New York#375121 in 9,183
Louisiana#37771 in 3,855
Texas#611101 in 7,888
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luke
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#34 → #33)
  • 2 spots since 2020 (#31 → #33)
  • 5 spots since 2015 (#28 → #33)
  • Biggest jump: 80 spots in 1892 (#359 → #279)
  • Biggest drop: 105 spots in 1933 (#438 → #543)
Rise & fade · boys
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #28 (10,523 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 36 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1992–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 183
  • Highest: 1 in 183 boys born in 2014 were named Luke (0.55%)
  • Latest: 1 in 246 boys born in 2025 (0.41%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 28.9% of all boys named Luke (93,274) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s442#230 (1887)#249
1890s402#245 (1895)#285
1900s498#243 (1900)#287
1910s1,343#291 (1910)#403
1920s1,699#424 (1924)#465
1930s1,269#438 (1932)#514
1940s1,298#532 (1948)#553
1950s2,308#424 (1959)#495
1960s4,071#367 (1969)#389
1970s10,283#110 (1979)#249
1980s27,044#97 (1980)#109
1990s44,434#67 (1999)#88
2000s90,506#41 (2005)#46
2010s93,274#28 (2014)#33
2020s44,149#31 (2020)#33

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luke in 1944

boys
#559
118 births · 1 in 11,550 boys

Top boys' names in 1944

  1. #1James76,951
  2. #2Robert70,855
  3. #3John66,616
  4. #4William52,375
  5. #5Richard45,643
  6. #6David37,382
  7. #7Charles34,662
  8. #8Thomas31,604
  9. #9Michael26,717
  10. #10Ronald25,513
  11. #559Luke118
More about 1944

boys

1,362,875 boys got a published name in 1944; 1 in 11,550 of them was named Luke, which outranked 85.7% of the 3,909 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luke
  1. #554Jefferson119
  2. #554Quentin119
  3. #554Sandy119
  4. #559Luke118
  5. #559Abel118
  6. #559Elias118
  7. #559Isiah118
  8. #564Basil117
  9. #564Blaine117
  10. #564Cleo117

Tied with 4 names at #559; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1943
Risers
  1. ↑ 647Rickie#1,461 → #814
  2. ↑ 586Rusty#1,577 → #991
  3. ↑ 585Humberto#1,280 → #695
  4. ↑ 408Llewellyn#1,343 → #935
  5. ↑ 402Hilario#1,308 → #906
Fallers
  1. ↓ 359Elwyn#923 → #1,282
  2. ↓ 356Albin#856 → #1,212
  3. ↓ 348Prentiss#980 → #1,328
  4. ↓ 286Barrie#969 → #1,255
  5. ↓ 269Duke#986 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1944 →