Luke

#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #33 for boys in 2025, 6,948 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2014 · 10,523 births
Debut · boys
43 births
In top 100 · boys
36 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
323,020
since 1880

Luke over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201962peak #28, 2014boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#10,1079#336,948
2024#12,1617#347,062
2023—#317,251
2022#12,2437#347,393
2021#12,2067#327,711
2020#13,4536#317,784
2019#9,73610#328,442
2018#10,5459#308,624
2017#14,1246#309,224
2016#9,41111#2910,001
2015#11,8358#2810,294
2014#8,48513#2810,523
2013#16,5475#349,588
2012#12,1998#379,022
2011#12,1538#398,706
2010#14,9596#418,850
2009—#478,625
2008#10,08411#439,424
2007#13,9247#469,609
2006#8,71513#4310,087
2005#7,13816#4110,011
2004#3,89836#419,598
2003#7,20715#469,304
2002#10,2469#468,692
2001#6,61916#508,008
2000#15,0315#597,148
1999#7,71612#676,137
1998#9,2609#755,284
1997#9,8028#784,953
1996#11,8076#755,017
1995#11,7836#824,629
1994#7,60411#914,095
1993#7,49811#874,357
1992#6,65213#934,066
1991#7,98710#1133,013
1990#10,1937#1182,883
1989#9,6817#1212,712
1988#3,89323#1192,619
1987#4,85716#1112,592
1986#4,96415#1062,654
1985#4,12619#1062,741
1984#3,42324#1102,471
1983#3,43123#1052,655
1982#4,02519#1192,478
1981#5,88511#1003,013
1980#3,71921#973,109
1979#5,75111#1102,470
1978#5,95810#1391,882
1977#9,6525#1901,242
1976—#223913
1975—#256778
1974—#265725
1973—#285633
1972#8,2925#319575
1971#5,5439#347530
1970#7,0706#351535
1969—#367451
1968—#396387
1967—#409346
1966—#398355
1965—#392400
1964—#374445
1963—#386422
1962—#392426
1961—#393413
1960—#383426
1959—#424353
1958—#429337
1957—#452291
1956—#486245
1955—#500219
1954—#516197
1953—#544169
1952—#556158
1951—#525169
1950—#514170
1949—#533155
1948—#532155
1947—#548151
1946—#562130
1945—#554116
1944—#559118
1943—#565126
1942—#598110
1941—#535121
1940—#545116
1939—#533116
1938—#522123
1937—#547113
1936—#529116
1935—#525121
1934—#530122
1933—#543110
1932—#438165
1931—#474142
1930—#503141
1929—#474153
1928—#495149
1927—#481158
1926—#472162
1925—#467165
1924—#424206
1923—#449185
1922—#440190
1921—#476165
1920—#472166
1919—#459165
1918—#447176
1917—#443163
1916—#411183
1915—#432157
1914—#365168
1913—#402115
1912—#42883
1911—#34962
1910—#29171
1909—#30257
1908—#30352
1907—#31845
1906—#26157
1905—#27053
1904—#31240
1903—#27346
1902—#29941
1901—#28437
1900—#24370
1899—#29435
1898—#30738
1897—#26344
1896—#27045
1895—#24553
1894—#30832
1893—#25548
1892—#27942
1891—#35923
1890—#26842
1889—#24444
1888—#26245
1887—#23047
1886—#23550
1885—#23350
1884—#27139
1883—#26338
1882—#25844
1881—#23742
1880—#25243
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Luke was already there! It came in at #252, and was given to 43 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 24 boys a year got the name.

Where Luke is popular in 1962

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNHWashington: #307 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,395 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #269 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,051 boysMNIllinois: #313 for boys · 29 births · 1 in 3,800 boysILWisconsin: #225 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 2,844 boysWIMichigan: #277 for boys · 26 births · 1 in 3,398 boysMINew York: #326 for boys · 41 births · 1 in 4,264 boysNYMassachusetts: #237 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 3,980 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedSDIowa: #288 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,635 boysIAIndiana: #325 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 4,356 boysINOhio: #360 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 6,204 boysOHPennsylvania: #245 for boys · 35 births · 1 in 3,170 boysPANew Jersey: #233 for boys · 25 births · 1 in 2,460 boysNJConnecticut: #227 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,886 boysCTCalifornia: #448 for boys · 30 births · 1 in 6,234 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNEMissouri: #437 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 7,749 boysMOKentucky: #404 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,825 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWVVirginia: #501 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,644 boysVAMaryland: #375 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,334 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedARTennessee: #452 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 7,748 boysTNNorth Carolina: #412 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 5,717 boysNCSouth Carolina: #386 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,538 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #279 for boys · 20 births · 1 in 2,022 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMSAlabama: #446 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,064 boysALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedHITexas: #562 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 7,458 boysTXFlorida: #510 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,741 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Wisconsin#225 · 1 in 2,844
  2. Connecticut#227 · 1 in 2,886
  3. New Jersey#233 · 1 in 2,460
  4. Massachusetts#237 · 1 in 3,980
  5. Pennsylvania#245 · 1 in 3,170

Best ever in a state: #4 in Louisiana, 2022.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wisconsin#225161 in 2,844
Connecticut#22791 in 2,886
New Jersey#233251 in 2,460
Massachusetts#237141 in 3,980
Pennsylvania#245351 in 3,170
Minnesota#269101 in 4,051
Michigan#277261 in 3,398
Louisiana#279201 in 2,022
Iowa#28881 in 3,635
Washington#30791 in 3,395
Illinois#313291 in 3,800
Indiana#325121 in 4,356
New York#326411 in 4,264
Ohio#360171 in 6,204
Maryland#37551 in 6,334
South Carolina#38661 in 4,538
Kentucky#40451 in 6,825
North Carolina#41291 in 5,717
Missouri#43761 in 7,749
Alabama#44661 in 6,064
California#448301 in 6,234
Tennessee#45251 in 7,748
Virginia#50151 in 8,644
Florida#51071 in 7,741
Texas#562161 in 7,458
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luke
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#34 → #33)
  • 2 spots since 2020 (#31 → #33)
  • 5 spots since 2015 (#28 → #33)
  • Biggest jump: 80 spots in 1892 (#359 → #279)
  • Biggest drop: 105 spots in 1933 (#438 → #543)
Rise & fade · boys
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #28 (10,523 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 36 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1992–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 183
  • Highest: 1 in 183 boys born in 2014 were named Luke (0.55%)
  • Latest: 1 in 246 boys born in 2025 (0.41%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 28.9% of all boys named Luke (93,274) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s442#230 (1887)#249
1890s402#245 (1895)#285
1900s498#243 (1900)#287
1910s1,343#291 (1910)#403
1920s1,699#424 (1924)#465
1930s1,269#438 (1932)#514
1940s1,298#532 (1948)#553
1950s2,308#424 (1959)#495
1960s4,071#367 (1969)#389
1970s10,283#110 (1979)#249
1980s27,044#97 (1980)#109
1990s44,434#67 (1999)#88
2000s90,506#41 (2005)#46
2010s93,274#28 (2014)#33
2020s44,149#31 (2020)#33

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luke in 1962

boys
#392
426 births · 1 in 4,856 boys

Top boys' names in 1962

  1. #1Michael85,059
  2. #2David81,337
  3. #3John78,427
  4. #4James72,555
  5. #5Robert70,199
  6. #6Mark53,520
  7. #7William44,853
  8. #8Richard39,422
  9. #9Thomas36,529
  10. #10Jeffrey33,537
  11. #392Luke426
More about 1962

boys

2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 4,856 of them was named Luke, which outranked 91.5% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luke
  1. #389Vance431
  2. #390Julius429
  3. #391Doyle427
  4. #392Luke426
  5. #393Rod425
  6. #394Roosevelt422
  7. #395Lowell419
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. ↑ 490Ritchie#1,262 → #772
  2. ↑ 353King#1,349 → #996
  3. ↑ 338Arlie#1,322 → #984
  4. ↑ 250Robb#1,052 → #802
  5. ↑ 243Pernell#928 → #685
Fallers
  1. ↓ 351Mariano#928 → #1,279
  2. ↓ 349Michal#910 → #1,259
  3. ↓ 337Loran#958 → #1,295
  4. ↓ 292Sid#967 → #1,259
  5. ↓ 275Lorenza#940 → #1,215

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1962 →