Luna

#27 for girls in 2025, 6,076 births · #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2022 · 8,977 births
Debut · girls
15 births
In top 100 · girls
10 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
87,715
since 1880

Luna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202008peak #10, 2022girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#276,076#8,2439
2024#137,164#8,3129
2023#107,853#8,2559
2022#108,977#5,87415
2021#118,241#7,08911
2020#147,850#7,03411
2019#167,800#8,2159
2018#236,937#12,1565
2017#375,356#8,8408
2016#773,688#10,7446
2015#1122,809#12,0865
2014#1422,341#12,1085
2013#1831,747—
2012#2251,414—
2011#2791,145—
2010#342942#9,6937
2009#3241,015—
2008#397808—
2007#452713—
2006#512592—
2005#594477—
2004#724369—
2003#886272—
2002#1,156178—
2001#1,206169—
2000#1,318144—
1999#1,548109—
1998#1,587103—
1997#1,70791—
1996#2,01469—
1995#2,51650—
1994#2,62747—
1993#4,39323—
1992#4,52822—
1991#4,32923—
1990#5,83515—
1989#4,52220—
1988#5,06516—
1987#11,3255—
1986#5,45913—
1985#7,5638—
1984#5,89911—
1983#6,7059—
1982#5,53412—
1981#5,88511—
1980#6,31910—
1979#7,3138—
1978#7,6497—
1977#6,8928—
1976#6,6118—
1975#5,9849—
1974#8,7755—
1973——
1972#4,79311—
1971——
1970#4,76111—
1969#4,19812—
1968——
1967——
1966——
1965——
1964#6,7675—
1963——
1962#5,8606—
1961——
1960#5,6966—
1959——
1958#6,1035—
1957#4,5368—
1956#5,9525—
1955——
1954#4,6557—
1953——
1952#5,5635—
1951#4,0118—
1950#4,7386—
1949#3,8928—
1948#3,5939—
1947——
1946#4,4176—
1945#3,3888—
1944#2,62512—
1943#3,04010—
1942#2,11717—
1941#2,39713—
1940#3,2088—
1939#2,41712—
1938#2,44712—
1937#1,99916—
1936#2,38612—
1935#1,77919—
1934#2,08715—
1933#1,77319—
1932#1,38229—
1931#1,87618—
1930#1,74821—
1929#1,28234—
1928#1,50228—
1927#1,27838—
1926#1,83022—
1925#1,16044—
1924#1,40934—
1923#1,00556—
1922#1,07850—
1921#94661—
1920#1,08747—
1919#1,04248#4,1685
1918#1,09145—
1917#1,00249—
1916#88758—
1915#1,07539#3,8255
1914#87844—
1913#91334—
1912#90331—
1911#89823—
1910#69138—
1909#77327—
1908#60239—
1907#64933—
1906#71626—
1905#64230—
1904#62930—
1903#62828—
1902#58332—
1901#65923—
1900#63930—
1899#55030—
1898#57132—
1897#47736—
1896#59427—
1895#63823—
1894#52730—
1893#53527—
1892#55425—
1891#52424—
1890#53824—
1889#58919—
1888#51224—
1887#47122—
1886#49120—
1885#55715—
1884#47918—
1883#46517—
1882——
1881#39318—
1880#43515—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Luna was already there! It came in at #435, and was given to 15 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Luna is popular in 2008

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedNHWashington: #338 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,461 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #541 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,862 girlsMNIllinois: #558 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 2,879 girlsILWisconsin: #657 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,579 girlsWIMichigan: #612 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,420 girlsMINew York: #385 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 1,950 girlsNYMassachusetts: #600 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,403 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedRIOregon: #303 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,185 girlsORNevada: #248 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 936 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedIAIndiana: #1,030 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,501 girlsINOhio: #942 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,265 girlsOHPennsylvania: #796 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,031 girlsPANew Jersey: #359 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,786 girlsNJConnecticut: #514 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,602 girlsCTCalifornia: #217 for girls · 220 births · 1 in 1,042 girlsCAUtah: #524 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,472 girlsUTColorado: #416 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,750 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedNEMissouri: #732 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,205 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedWVVirginia: #605 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,135 girlsVAMaryland: #619 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,159 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedDEArizona: #268 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 1,177 girlsAZNew Mexico: #392 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,410 girlsNMKansas: #514 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,305 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedARTennessee: #544 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,683 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #626 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,205 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #370 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,600 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #761 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,488 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedALGeorgia: #498 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 2,401 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Luna, so not publishedHITexas: #357 for girls · 98 births · 1 in 1,711 girlsTXFlorida: #213 for girls · 81 births · 1 in 1,063 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Florida#213 · 1 in 1,063
  2. California#217 · 1 in 1,042
  3. Nevada#248 · 1 in 936
  4. Arizona#268 · 1 in 1,177
  5. Oregon#303 · 1 in 1,185

Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 2021.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Florida#213811 in 1,063
California#2172201 in 1,042
Nevada#248131 in 936
Arizona#268311 in 1,177
Oregon#303141 in 1,185
Washington#338221 in 1,461
Texas#357981 in 1,711
New Jersey#359221 in 1,786
South Carolina#370121 in 1,600
New York#385491 in 1,950
New Mexico#39261 in 1,410
Colorado#416141 in 1,750
Georgia#498221 in 2,401
Connecticut#51451 in 2,602
Kansas#51461 in 2,305
Utah#52481 in 2,472
Minnesota#54191 in 2,862
Tennessee#544121 in 2,683
Illinois#558231 in 2,879
Massachusetts#60081 in 3,403
Virginia#605121 in 3,135
Michigan#612131 in 3,420
Maryland#61981 in 3,159
North Carolina#626151 in 3,205
Wisconsin#65771 in 3,579
Missouri#73271 in 4,205
Oklahoma#76151 in 3,488
Pennsylvania#796111 in 5,031
Ohio#94291 in 6,265
Indiana#1,03051 in 6,501
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luna
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 14 spots since 2024 (#13 → #27)
  • 13 spots since 2020 (#14 → #27)
  • 85 spots since 2015 (#112 → #27)
  • Biggest jump: 270 spots in 2003 (#1,156 → #886)
  • Biggest drop: 207 spots in 1911 (#691 → #898)
Rise & fade · girls
142 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2022 at #10 (8,977 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 2 yrs
  • Top 10: 2 yrs · run 2022–2023
  • Top 100: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
  • Top 1,000: 59 yrs · run 1883–1914
Share of babies · girls
1 in 183
  • Highest: 1 in 183 girls born in 2022 were named Luna (0.55%)
  • Latest: 1 in 265 girls born in 2025 (0.38%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
  • 52.6% of all girls named Luna (46,161) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s168#393 (1881)#488
1890s278#477 (1897)#551
1900s298#583 (1902)#652
1910s409#691 (1910)#938
1920s414#946 (1921)#1,258
1930s173#1,382 (1932)#1,989
1940s91#2,117 (1942)#3,186
1950s44#4,011 (1951)#5,080
1960s29#4,198 (1969)#5,630
1970s67#4,761 (1970)#6,597
1980s115#4,522 (1989)#6,428
1990s552#1,548 (1999)#3,108
2000s4,737#324 (2009)#757
2010s34,179#16 (2019)#144
2020s46,161#10 (2022)#14

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luna in 2008

girls
#397
808 births · 1 in 2,340 girls

Top girls' names in 2008

  1. #1Emma18,830
  2. #2Isabella18,629
  3. #3Emily17,448
  4. #4Olivia17,088
  5. #5Ava17,051
  6. #6Madison17,047
  7. #7Sophia16,091
  8. #8Abigail15,088
  9. #9Elizabeth12,027
  10. #10Chloe11,836
  11. #397Luna808
More about 2008

girls

1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 2,340 of them was named Luna, which outranked 98.1% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luna
  1. #394Bridget820
  2. #395Raegan816
  3. #396Jadyn812
  4. #397Luna808
  5. #398Annika807
  6. #398Yasmin807
  7. #400Celeste806
Biggest movers since 2007
Risers
  1. ↑ 9,375Dayami#10,129 → #754
  2. ↑ 4,524Allisson#4,944 → #420
  3. ↑ 1,019Alisson#1,804 → #785
  4. ↑ 851Milagros#1,579 → #728
  5. ↑ 807Mareli#1,530 → #723
Fallers
  1. ↓ 391Kelis#968 → #1,359
  2. ↓ 390Joselin#755 → #1,145
  3. ↓ 378Tyra#947 → #1,325
  4. ↓ 363Montana#932 → #1,295
  5. ↓ 337Allyssa#988 → #1,325

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2008 →