Lura

Last seen for girls in 2024 at #10,271 · Last seen for boys in 1919 at #4,168
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1885 · 88 births
Debut · girls
53 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
9,550
since 1880

Lura over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lura has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201949peak #200, 1885girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024#10,2719—
2023#15,1945—
2022#8,03213—
2021#8,97811—
2020#11,0908—
2019#10,4739—
2018#8,14613—
2017#7,84014—
2016#11,7818—
2015#10,8669—
2014#8,96612—
2013#10,23510—
2012#11,2579—
2011——
2010#11,2469—
2009#10,67910—
2008#7,40817—
2007#17,6365—
2006——
2005#10,9219—
2004#12,7617—
2003#8,50512—
2002#8,28012—
2001#11,0208—
2000#5,93718—
1999#14,4115—
1998#7,53212—
1997#9,8028—
1996#6,06415—
1995#5,95815—
1994#6,67213—
1993#4,39323—
1992#4,52822—
1991#4,80820—
1990#4,52321—
1989#6,16013—
1988#4,84017—
1987#3,10130—
1986#2,97331—
1985#3,73022—
1984#3,06928—
1983#3,24225—
1982#2,95930—
1981#2,77432—
1980#3,41124—
1979#3,54122—
1978#2,57233—
1977#2,60632—
1976#3,18822—
1975#3,25921—
1974#3,11022—
1973#1,97941—
1972#2,82024—
1971#2,73626—
1970#2,04340—
1969#1,80946—
1968#1,94038—
1967#1,78342—
1966#2,14730—
1965#1,76841—
1964#1,44361—
1963#1,67247—
1962#1,44459—
1961#1,58051—
1960#1,48755—
1959#1,47853—
1958#1,39558—
1957#1,55048—
1956#1,26068—
1955#1,18671—
1954#1,39252—
1953#1,22562—
1952#1,17166—
1951#1,10471—
1950#1,04177—
1949#99282—
1948#1,00176—
1947#861103—
1946#83398—
1945#84280—
1944#1,04057—
1943#93570—
1942#90275—
1941#91864—
1940#76284—
1939#80573—
1938#74985—
1937#75281—
1936#78574—
1935#641103—
1934#67199—
1933#72182—
1932#612116—
1931#594124—
1930#619125—
1929#638118—
1928#639122—
1927#556162—
1926#597141—
1925#553169—
1924#551175—
1923#533177—
1922#501193—
1921#521184—
1920#504188—
1919#477195#4,1685
1918#475200—
1917#419230—
1916#469184—
1915#462178—
1914#434156—
1913#51697—
1912#431118—
1911#402100—
1910#40395—
1909#364100—
1908#36797—
1907#37687—
1906#37682—
1905#34298—
1904#33793—
1903#33587—
1902#307107—
1901#33982—
1900#36087—
1899#33082—
1898#33190—
1897#32082—
1896#30094—
1895#29893—
1894#262109—
1893#265103—
1892#29683—
1891#238102—
1890#232110—
1889#233100—
1888#24491—
1887#22387—
1886#23377—
1885#20088—
1884#22173—
1883#22365—
1882#25047—
1881#23146—
1880#21153—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lura was already there! It came in at #211, and was given to 53 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2006–2007, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Lura is popular in 1949

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #834 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 14,153 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedKSArkansas: #396 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,724 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedLAMississippi: #497 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,834 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedHITexas: #813 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 11,841 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Lura, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Arkansas#396 · 1 in 3,724
  2. Mississippi#497 · 1 in 5,834
  3. Texas#813 · 1 in 11,841
  4. California#834 · 1 in 14,153

Best ever in a state: #181 in West Virginia, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arkansas#39661 in 3,724
Mississippi#49751 in 5,834
Texas#81381 in 11,841
California#83481 in 14,153
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lura
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
  • Biggest jump: 198 spots in 1945 (#1,040 → #842)
  • Biggest drop: 156 spots in 1941 (#762 → #918)
Rise & fade · girls
5 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1885 at #200 (88 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 80 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 68 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 68 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,512
  • Highest: 1 in 1,512 girls born in 1885 were named Lura (0.07%)
  • Latest: 1 in 180,021 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 17.1% of all girls named Lura (1,629) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s727#200 (1885)#227
1890s948#232 (1890)#287
1900s920#307 (1902)#350
1910s1,553#402 (1911)#449
1920s1,629#501 (1922)#559
1930s962#594 (1931)#695
1940s789#762 (1940)#909
1950s626#1,041 (1950)#1,280
1960s470#1,443 (1964)#1,707
1970s283#1,979 (1973)#2,785
1980s252#2,774 (1981)#3,626
1990s154#4,393 (1993)#6,869
2000s98#5,937 (2000)#10,350
2010s93#7,840 (2017)#10,090
2020s46#8,032 (2022)#10,713

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lura in 1949

girls
#992
82 births · 1 in 20,864 girls

Top girls' names in 1949

  1. #1Linda91,015
  2. #2Mary66,874
  3. #3Patricia46,324
  4. #4Barbara42,600
  5. #5Susan37,709
  6. #6Sandra30,643
  7. #7Nancy29,249
  8. #8Carol26,780
  9. #9Kathleen26,357
  10. #10Sharon25,713
  11. #992Lura82
More about 1949

girls

1,710,877 girls got a published name in 1949; 1 in 20,864 of them was named Lura, which outranked 83.6% of the 6,066 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lura
  1. #982Lindsay83
  2. #982Margarett83
  3. #982Zella83
  4. #992Lura82
  5. #992Dorinda82
  6. #992Edythe82
  7. #992Ernestina82
  8. #1,000Carolee81
  9. #1,000Ginny81
  10. #1,000Marylee81

Tied with 7 names at #992; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1948
Risers
  1. ↑ 937Sharman#1,708 → #771
  2. ↑ 665Roseanna#1,422 → #757
  3. ↑ 483Shauna#1,173 → #690
  4. ↑ 293Jacalyn#1,116 → #823
  5. ↑ 267Sanjuana#1,185 → #918
Fallers
  1. ↓ 339Sandie#939 → #1,278
  2. ↓ 296Syble#955 → #1,251
  3. ↓ 272Shirleen#964 → #1,236
  4. ↓ 266Ginny#734 → #1,000
  5. ↓ 260Dina#861 → #1,121

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1949 →