Lydia

#92 for girls in 2025, 2,692 births · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1883 · 378 births
Debut · girls
302 births
In top 100 · girls
35 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
187,039
since 1880

Lydia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201916peak #75, 1883girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#922,692—
2024#972,678—
2023#942,735—
2022#932,818—
2021#892,935—
2020#952,804#10,6056
2019#943,015—
2018#893,213—
2017#853,341#9,6967
2016#803,625—
2015#803,514—
2014#843,652—
2013#953,262#12,1365
2012#953,176—
2011#963,092—
2010#1102,840#10,7666
2009#1172,830—
2008#1202,876—
2007#1242,773—
2006#1302,668#12,0555
2005#1192,785#8,2998
2004#1262,636#5,00716
2003#1272,647—
2002#1372,512—
2001#1402,364—
2000#1462,321—
1999#1482,189—
1998#1532,071—
1997#1601,937—
1996#1731,813—
1995#1691,759—
1994#1881,603—
1993#2061,421—
1992#2011,414—
1991#2141,378—
1990#2041,406—
1989#2171,262#7,9055
1988#2211,174—
1987#2191,209#4,23910
1986#2291,129#3,44013
1985#2121,220—
1984#2171,201#4,5528
1983#2391,023#6,2385
1982#2401,051#6,3855
1981#265940—
1980#287862#6,2505
1979#296803#6,0565
1978#323708#5,7725
1977#311765—
1976#307747—
1975#333669#4,3097
1974#316722—
1973#329677—
1972#319753#3,9637
1971#314844—
1970#307924#4,7245
1969#320807—
1968#300863—
1967#289877—
1966#273954#3,9485
1965#2631,079#3,2447
1964#2581,183—
1963#2461,291#4,0485
1962#2261,412#4,0335
1961#2141,573—
1960#2051,670#3,6656
1959#2101,561#3,9885
1958#2071,577#3,5596
1957#2061,621#3,5526
1956#2061,545#3,9425
1955#2001,585—
1954#1971,560—
1953#2011,560—
1952#2131,327—
1951#2251,150—
1950#2231,127—
1949#2141,241—
1948#2091,222—
1947#2301,050—
1946#239886—
1945#224856—
1944#233807—
1943#228864#2,9647
1942#225854#3,5605
1941#247682#2,33310
1940#234726#3,4595
1939#238680#3,4805
1938#242677—
1937#237687#2,4799
1936#237688#2,8547
1935#244669#2,39610
1934#248632—
1933#237668—
1932#246630—
1931#235646—
1930#233687#4,0015
1929#223745#3,9595
1928#219815#4,1515
1927#217876#3,4517
1926#223813—
1925#207954—
1924#214912#4,3475
1923#204966—
1922#1991,025—
1921#1971,052—
1920#1851,118#4,2865
1919#1861,059—
1918#1791,148—
1917#1691,180—
1916#1681,148—
1915#1691,086—
1914#168839—
1913#154759—
1912#152701—
1911#142568—
1910#152537—
1909#142503—
1908#140499—
1907#130512—
1906#132477—
1905#123518—
1904#112545—
1903#116502—
1902#112535#1,1375
1901#103507—
1900#104644—
1899#97566—
1898#88677—
1897#83642—
1896#91580—
1895#85656—
1894#85618—
1893#81598—
1892#93522—
1891#86507—
1890#78576—
1889#83496—
1888#85472—
1887#76448—
1886#87392—
1885#77404—
1884#80369—
1883#75378—
1882#76342—
1881#77299—
1880#77302—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lydia was already there! It came in at #77, and was given to 302 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 450 girls a year got the name.

Where Lydia is popular in 1916

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedAKMaine: #145 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 635 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedNHWashington: #186 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,048 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedIDMontana: #110 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 465 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #64 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 214 girlsNDMinnesota: #120 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 570 girlsMNIllinois: #152 for girls · 70 births · 1 in 827 girlsILWisconsin: #105 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 436 girlsWIMichigan: #143 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 733 girlsMINew York: #203 for girls · 68 births · 1 in 1,382 girlsNYMassachusetts: #144 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 899 girlsMARhode Island: #154 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 823 girlsRIOregon: #147 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 695 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #128 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 531 girlsSDIowa: #152 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 828 girlsIAIndiana: #191 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,317 girlsINOhio: #150 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 905 girlsOHPennsylvania: #139 for girls · 97 births · 1 in 920 girlsPANew Jersey: #177 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,196 girlsNJConnecticut: #147 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 817 girlsCTCalifornia: #156 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 752 girlsCAUtah: #140 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 557 girlsUTColorado: #68 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 234 girlsCONebraska: #81 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 313 girlsNEMissouri: #170 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 995 girlsMOKentucky: #194 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,046 girlsKYWest Virginia: #197 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,085 girlsWVVirginia: #171 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,011 girlsVAMaryland: #169 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,095 girlsMDDelaware: #66 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 270 girlsDEArizona: #64 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 215 girlsAZNew Mexico: #105 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 333 girlsNMKansas: #135 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 617 girlsKSArkansas: #185 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 820 girlsARTennessee: #220 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,359 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #223 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,527 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #156 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 801 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lydia, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #214 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,146 girlsOKLouisiana: #158 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 657 girlsLAMississippi: #273 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,801 girlsMSAlabama: #221 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,293 girlsALGeorgia: #290 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,411 girlsGAHawaii: #101 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 324 girlsHITexas: #140 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 585 girlsTXFlorida: #224 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,240 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#64 · 1 in 214
  2. Arizona#64 · 1 in 215
  3. Delaware#66 · 1 in 270
  4. Colorado#68 · 1 in 234
  5. Nebraska#81 · 1 in 313

Best ever in a state: #11 in South Dakota, 2019.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arizona#64111 in 215
North Dakota#64351 in 214
Delaware#6661 in 270
Colorado#68291 in 234
Nebraska#81361 in 313
Hawaii#10171 in 324
New Mexico#10591 in 333
Wisconsin#105541 in 436
Montana#110111 in 465
Minnesota#120381 in 570
South Dakota#128111 in 531
Kansas#135241 in 617
Pennsylvania#139971 in 920
Texas#140771 in 585
Utah#14081 in 557
Michigan#143441 in 733
Massachusetts#144371 in 899
Maine#14591 in 635
Connecticut#147161 in 817
Oregon#14771 in 695
Ohio#150531 in 905
Illinois#152701 in 827
Iowa#152251 in 828
Rhode Island#15461 in 823
California#156261 in 752
South Carolina#156241 in 801
Louisiana#158271 in 657
Maryland#169111 in 1,095
Missouri#170291 in 995
Virginia#171241 in 1,011
New Jersey#177241 in 1,196
Arkansas#185201 in 820
Washington#18681 in 1,048
Indiana#191181 in 1,317
Kentucky#194231 in 1,046
West Virginia#197141 in 1,085
New York#203681 in 1,382
Oklahoma#214161 in 1,146
Tennessee#220171 in 1,359
Alabama#221201 in 1,293
North Carolina#223201 in 1,527
Florida#22471 in 1,240
Mississippi#273101 in 1,801
Georgia#290131 in 2,411
Alaska———
District of Columbia———
Idaho———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lydia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 5 spots since 2024 (#97 → #92)
  • 3 spots since 2020 (#95 → #92)
  • 12 spots since 2015 (#80 → #92)
  • Biggest jump: 27 spots in 1979 (#323 → #296)
  • Biggest drop: 20 spots in 1963 (#226 → #246)
Rise & fade · girls
3 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1883 at #75 (378 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 35 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1880–1899
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 297
  • Highest: 1 in 297 girls born in 1883 were named Lydia (0.34%)
  • Latest: 1 in 597 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 17.5% of all girls named Lydia (32,730) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s3,902#75 (1883)#79
1890s5,942#78 (1890)#87
1900s5,242#103 (1901)#121
1910s9,025#142 (1911)#164
1920s9,276#185 (1920)#209
1930s6,664#233 (1930)#240
1940s9,188#209 (1948)#228
1950s14,613#197 (1954)#209
1960s11,709#205 (1960)#259
1970s7,612#296 (1979)#316
1980s11,071#212 (1985)#235
1990s16,991#148 (1999)#182
2000s26,412#117 (2009)#129
2010s32,730#80 (2016)#91
2020s16,662#89 (2021)#93

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lydia in 1916

girls
#168
1,148 births · 1 in 910 girls

Top girls' names in 1916

  1. #1Mary61,438
  2. #2Helen32,661
  3. #3Dorothy27,418
  4. #4Margaret24,953
  5. #5Ruth23,189
  6. #6Mildred15,633
  7. #7Anna15,228
  8. #8Elizabeth14,940
  9. #9Frances13,746
  10. #10Virginia12,487
  11. #168Lydia1,148
More about 1916

girls

1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 910 of them was named Lydia, which outranked 96.7% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lydia
  1. #165Della1,172
  2. #166Adeline1,168
  3. #167Amelia1,159
  4. #168Lydia1,148
  5. #169Rebecca1,132
  6. #170Nina1,130
  7. #171Nettie1,125
Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
  1. ↑ 567Trinidad#1,317 → #750
  2. ↑ 388Coral#1,367 → #979
  3. ↑ 377Coletta#1,317 → #940
  4. ↑ 370Clifford#1,285 → #915
  5. ↑ 327Maida#1,231 → #904
Fallers
  1. ↓ 364Louis#934 → #1,298
  2. ↓ 354Herminia#944 → #1,298
  3. ↓ 346Gertha#900 → #1,246
  4. ↓ 344Lahoma#934 → #1,278
  5. ↓ 310Hassie#900 → #1,210

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1916 →