Lydia
#92 for girls in 2025, 2,692 births · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1883 · 378 births
- Debut · girls
- 302 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 35 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 187,039since 1880
Lydia over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #92 | 2,692 | — | |
| 2024 | #97 | 2,678 | — | |
| 2023 | #94 | 2,735 | — | |
| 2022 | #93 | 2,818 | — | |
| 2021 | #89 | 2,935 | — | |
| 2020 | #95 | 2,804 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #94 | 3,015 | — | |
| 2018 | #89 | 3,213 | — | |
| 2017 | #85 | 3,341 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #80 | 3,625 | — | |
| 2015 | #80 | 3,514 | — | |
| 2014 | #84 | 3,652 | — | |
| 2013 | #95 | 3,262 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #95 | 3,176 | — | |
| 2011 | #96 | 3,092 | — | |
| 2010 | #110 | 2,840 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #117 | 2,830 | — | |
| 2008 | #120 | 2,876 | — | |
| 2007 | #124 | 2,773 | — | |
| 2006 | #130 | 2,668 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #119 | 2,785 | #8,299 | 8 |
| 2004 | #126 | 2,636 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #127 | 2,647 | — | |
| 2002 | #137 | 2,512 | — | |
| 2001 | #140 | 2,364 | — | |
| 2000 | #146 | 2,321 | — | |
| 1999 | #148 | 2,189 | — | |
| 1998 | #153 | 2,071 | — | |
| 1997 | #160 | 1,937 | — | |
| 1996 | #173 | 1,813 | — | |
| 1995 | #169 | 1,759 | — | |
| 1994 | #188 | 1,603 | — | |
| 1993 | #206 | 1,421 | — | |
| 1992 | #201 | 1,414 | — | |
| 1991 | #214 | 1,378 | — | |
| 1990 | #204 | 1,406 | — | |
| 1989 | #217 | 1,262 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #221 | 1,174 | — | |
| 1987 | #219 | 1,209 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1986 | #229 | 1,129 | #3,440 | 13 |
| 1985 | #212 | 1,220 | — | |
| 1984 | #217 | 1,201 | #4,552 | 8 |
| 1983 | #239 | 1,023 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #240 | 1,051 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #265 | 940 | — | |
| 1980 | #287 | 862 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #296 | 803 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #323 | 708 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #311 | 765 | — | |
| 1976 | #307 | 747 | — | |
| 1975 | #333 | 669 | #4,309 | 7 |
| 1974 | #316 | 722 | — | |
| 1973 | #329 | 677 | — | |
| 1972 | #319 | 753 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1971 | #314 | 844 | — | |
| 1970 | #307 | 924 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #320 | 807 | — | |
| 1968 | #300 | 863 | — | |
| 1967 | #289 | 877 | — | |
| 1966 | #273 | 954 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #263 | 1,079 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #258 | 1,183 | — | |
| 1963 | #246 | 1,291 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #226 | 1,412 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #214 | 1,573 | — | |
| 1960 | #205 | 1,670 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #210 | 1,561 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #207 | 1,577 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #206 | 1,621 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #206 | 1,545 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #200 | 1,585 | — | |
| 1954 | #197 | 1,560 | — | |
| 1953 | #201 | 1,560 | — | |
| 1952 | #213 | 1,327 | — | |
| 1951 | #225 | 1,150 | — | |
| 1950 | #223 | 1,127 | — | |
| 1949 | #214 | 1,241 | — | |
| 1948 | #209 | 1,222 | — | |
| 1947 | #230 | 1,050 | — | |
| 1946 | #239 | 886 | — | |
| 1945 | #224 | 856 | — | |
| 1944 | #233 | 807 | — | |
| 1943 | #228 | 864 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #225 | 854 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #247 | 682 | #2,333 | 10 |
| 1940 | #234 | 726 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #238 | 680 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #242 | 677 | — | |
| 1937 | #237 | 687 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #237 | 688 | #2,854 | 7 |
| 1935 | #244 | 669 | #2,396 | 10 |
| 1934 | #248 | 632 | — | |
| 1933 | #237 | 668 | — | |
| 1932 | #246 | 630 | — | |
| 1931 | #235 | 646 | — | |
| 1930 | #233 | 687 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #223 | 745 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #219 | 815 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #217 | 876 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #223 | 813 | — | |
| 1925 | #207 | 954 | — | |
| 1924 | #214 | 912 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #204 | 966 | — | |
| 1922 | #199 | 1,025 | — | |
| 1921 | #197 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1920 | #185 | 1,118 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #186 | 1,059 | — | |
| 1918 | #179 | 1,148 | — | |
| 1917 | #169 | 1,180 | — | |
| 1916 | #168 | 1,148 | — | |
| 1915 | #169 | 1,086 | — | |
| 1914 | #168 | 839 | — | |
| 1913 | #154 | 759 | — | |
| 1912 | #152 | 701 | — | |
| 1911 | #142 | 568 | — | |
| 1910 | #152 | 537 | — | |
| 1909 | #142 | 503 | — | |
| 1908 | #140 | 499 | — | |
| 1907 | #130 | 512 | — | |
| 1906 | #132 | 477 | — | |
| 1905 | #123 | 518 | — | |
| 1904 | #112 | 545 | — | |
| 1903 | #116 | 502 | — | |
| 1902 | #112 | 535 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #103 | 507 | — | |
| 1900 | #104 | 644 | — | |
| 1899 | #97 | 566 | — | |
| 1898 | #88 | 677 | — | |
| 1897 | #83 | 642 | — | |
| 1896 | #91 | 580 | — | |
| 1895 | #85 | 656 | — | |
| 1894 | #85 | 618 | — | |
| 1893 | #81 | 598 | — | |
| 1892 | #93 | 522 | — | |
| 1891 | #86 | 507 | — | |
| 1890 | #78 | 576 | — | |
| 1889 | #83 | 496 | — | |
| 1888 | #85 | 472 | — | |
| 1887 | #76 | 448 | — | |
| 1886 | #87 | 392 | — | |
| 1885 | #77 | 404 | — | |
| 1884 | #80 | 369 | — | |
| 1883 | #75 | 378 | — | |
| 1882 | #76 | 342 | — | |
| 1881 | #77 | 299 | — | |
| 1880 | #77 | 302 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lydia was already there! It came in at #77, and was given to 302 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 450 girls a year got the name.
Where Lydia is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#20 · 1 in 102
- South Dakota#21 · 1 in 126
- Minnesota#21 · 1 in 166
- Wyoming#27 · 1 in 113
- Utah#29 · 1 in 190
Best ever in a state: #11 in South Dakota, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #20 | 35 | 1 in 102 |
| Minnesota | #21 | 146 | 1 in 166 |
| South Dakota | #21 | 25 | 1 in 126 |
| Wyoming | #27 | 11 | 1 in 113 |
| Utah | #29 | 93 | 1 in 190 |
| Nebraska | #30 | 43 | 1 in 183 |
| Wisconsin | #31 | 114 | 1 in 202 |
| Iowa | #32 | 70 | 1 in 182 |
| Ohio | #37 | 219 | 1 in 240 |
| West Virginia | #39 | 32 | 1 in 207 |
| Missouri | #41 | 106 | 1 in 255 |
| North Dakota | #41 | 18 | 1 in 176 |
| Idaho | #44 | 28 | 1 in 221 |
| Kansas | #48 | 47 | 1 in 274 |
| Alaska | #49 | 13 | 1 in 188 |
| Indiana | #50 | 105 | 1 in 284 |
| Kentucky | #50 | 71 | 1 in 260 |
| Michigan | #51 | 149 | 1 in 279 |
| Pennsylvania | #56 | 171 | 1 in 305 |
| New Hampshire | #61 | 17 | 1 in 220 |
| Colorado | #65 | 70 | 1 in 325 |
| Vermont | #66 | 7 | 1 in 178 |
| Montana | #69 | 11 | 1 in 256 |
| North Carolina | #69 | 129 | 1 in 343 |
| Alabama | #70 | 57 | 1 in 328 |
| Oklahoma | #72 | 48 | 1 in 347 |
| Arkansas | #75 | 34 | 1 in 332 |
| South Carolina | #75 | 53 | 1 in 331 |
| Oregon | #78 | 42 | 1 in 358 |
| Tennessee | #78 | 81 | 1 in 367 |
| Virginia | #78 | 103 | 1 in 352 |
| Washington | #84 | 75 | 1 in 398 |
| Illinois | #108 | 115 | 1 in 504 |
| Georgia | #112 | 90 | 1 in 517 |
| Maryland | #127 | 43 | 1 in 547 |
| Rhode Island | #130 | 7 | 1 in 415 |
| Mississippi | #137 | 20 | 1 in 546 |
| Arizona | #144 | 45 | 1 in 683 |
| Delaware | #149 | 6 | 1 in 429 |
| Florida | #150 | 113 | 1 in 718 |
| Connecticut | #151 | 19 | 1 in 618 |
| New York | #151 | 119 | 1 in 767 |
| Louisiana | #156 | 31 | 1 in 650 |
| Hawaii | #172 | 6 | 1 in 545 |
| Massachusetts | #175 | 35 | 1 in 725 |
| Texas | #178 | 180 | 1 in 894 |
| Nevada | #206 | 14 | 1 in 753 |
| District of Columbia | #235 | 5 | 1 in 666 |
| New Mexico | #243 | 8 | 1 in 843 |
| California | #259 | 159 | 1 in 1,290 |
| New Jersey | #321 | 24 | 1 in 1,521 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lydia
- 5 spots since 2024 (#97 → #92)
- 3 spots since 2020 (#95 → #92)
- 12 spots since 2015 (#80 → #92)
- Biggest jump: 27 spots in 1979 (#323 → #296)
- Biggest drop: 20 spots in 1963 (#226 → #246)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #75 (378 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1880–1899
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 297 girls born in 1883 were named Lydia (0.34%)
- Latest: 1 in 597 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
- 17.5% of all girls named Lydia (32,730) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,902 | #75 (1883) | #79 |
| 1890s | 5,942 | #78 (1890) | #87 |
| 1900s | 5,242 | #103 (1901) | #121 |
| 1910s | 9,025 | #142 (1911) | #164 |
| 1920s | 9,276 | #185 (1920) | #209 |
| 1930s | 6,664 | #233 (1930) | #240 |
| 1940s | 9,188 | #209 (1948) | #228 |
| 1950s | 14,613 | #197 (1954) | #209 |
| 1960s | 11,709 | #205 (1960) | #259 |
| 1970s | 7,612 | #296 (1979) | #316 |
| 1980s | 11,071 | #212 (1985) | #235 |
| 1990s | 16,991 | #148 (1999) | #182 |
| 2000s | 26,412 | #117 (2009) | #129 |
| 2010s | 32,730 | #80 (2016) | #91 |
| 2020s | 16,662 | #89 (2021) | #93 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lydia in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
Top boys' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 538 of them was named Lydia, which outranked 99.5% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,891,581 boys got a published name in 2013; 1 in 378,316 of them was named Lydia, which outranked 13.7% of the 14,070 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 1,934 names at #12,136; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.