Lyle
- #14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births
- #1,046 for boys in 2025, 211 births
- Given to boys 98.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1918 · 993 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 59,190since 1880
Lyle over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Lyle has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #1,046 | 211 |
| 2024 | — | #1,019 | 219 | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #1,105 | 192 |
| 2022 | #9,680 | 10 | #1,052 | 209 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #1,006 | 217 |
| 2020 | — | #1,010 | 207 | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | #927 | 235 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #946 | 220 |
| 2017 | — | #993 | 205 | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | #980 | 208 |
| 2015 | — | #1,077 | 183 | |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | #1,110 | 172 |
| 2013 | #10,235 | 10 | #1,100 | 168 |
| 2012 | — | #1,299 | 133 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,257 | 137 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,565 | 101 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,762 | 86 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,861 | 78 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,728 | 86 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,467 | 104 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #1,635 | 83 |
| 2004 | — | #1,629 | 79 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,233 | 117 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,268 | 107 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,307 | 100 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,271 | 102 | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #1,303 | 93 |
| 1998 | — | #1,246 | 97 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,045 | 122 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,037 | 118 | |
| 1995 | — | #926 | 143 | |
| 1994 | — | #886 | 149 | |
| 1993 | — | #834 | 159 | |
| 1992 | — | #752 | 189 | |
| 1991 | — | #765 | 179 | |
| 1990 | — | #633 | 257 | |
| 1989 | — | #627 | 252 | |
| 1988 | — | #591 | 248 | |
| 1987 | — | #567 | 253 | |
| 1986 | — | #512 | 297 | |
| 1985 | — | #564 | 246 | |
| 1984 | — | #542 | 255 | |
| 1983 | — | #530 | 247 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #574 | 224 |
| 1981 | — | #533 | 246 | |
| 1980 | — | #524 | 268 | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #544 | 246 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #539 | 235 |
| 1977 | — | #485 | 279 | |
| 1976 | — | #540 | 221 | |
| 1975 | — | #508 | 247 | |
| 1974 | — | #484 | 271 | |
| 1973 | — | #460 | 287 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #448 | 313 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #406 | 395 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #376 | 465 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #376 | 435 |
| 1968 | — | #373 | 434 | |
| 1967 | — | #389 | 377 | |
| 1966 | — | #358 | 435 | |
| 1965 | — | #359 | 454 | |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #345 | 515 |
| 1963 | — | #329 | 575 | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #306 | 644 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #302 | 659 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #290 | 731 |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #286 | 761 |
| 1958 | #4,193 | 9 | #276 | 770 |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #261 | 838 |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | #258 | 794 |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | #246 | 821 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | #237 | 889 |
| 1953 | #2,595 | 17 | #226 | 891 |
| 1952 | #2,581 | 17 | #222 | 897 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | #232 | 815 |
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 | #223 | 828 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #219 | 835 |
| 1948 | #2,828 | 13 | #216 | 864 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #212 | 904 |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 | #200 | 859 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #194 | 766 |
| 1944 | #2,625 | 12 | #189 | 813 |
| 1943 | #2,251 | 16 | #185 | 884 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #176 | 890 |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | #168 | 939 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | #173 | 864 |
| 1939 | #2,922 | 9 | #175 | 834 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #183 | 790 |
| 1937 | #2,448 | 12 | #167 | 875 |
| 1936 | #2,153 | 14 | #159 | 910 |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 | #155 | 934 |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | #154 | 939 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | #158 | 916 |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 | #155 | 969 |
| 1931 | #1,686 | 21 | #157 | 944 |
| 1930 | #1,875 | 19 | #160 | 947 |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | #152 | 1,007 |
| 1928 | #2,194 | 16 | #155 | 999 |
| 1927 | #2,169 | 17 | #151 | 1,054 |
| 1926 | #1,830 | 22 | #152 | 1,051 |
| 1925 | #1,847 | 22 | #154 | 1,012 |
| 1924 | #1,811 | 23 | #159 | 1,000 |
| 1923 | #1,944 | 20 | #153 | 1,011 |
| 1922 | #2,291 | 16 | #146 | 1,055 |
| 1921 | #1,437 | 32 | #150 | 1,007 |
| 1920 | #1,511 | 29 | #151 | 967 |
| 1919 | #1,649 | 24 | #153 | 877 |
| 1918 | #2,102 | 17 | #145 | 993 |
| 1917 | #1,431 | 27 | #153 | 855 |
| 1916 | #2,028 | 16 | #152 | 806 |
| 1915 | #1,883 | 17 | #159 | 719 |
| 1914 | #1,175 | 27 | #178 | 495 |
| 1913 | #1,465 | 16 | #196 | 342 |
| 1912 | #1,421 | 15 | #180 | 325 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | #223 | 128 |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 | #216 | 117 |
| 1909 | — | #262 | 72 | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #245 | 75 |
| 1907 | #1,512 | 8 | #233 | 76 |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | #195 | 93 |
| 1905 | #1,238 | 10 | #249 | 61 |
| 1904 | — | #215 | 74 | |
| 1903 | — | #223 | 66 | |
| 1902 | #1,438 | 7 | #272 | 48 |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #223 | 60 |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | #297 | 49 |
| 1899 | — | #257 | 42 | |
| 1898 | #1,171 | 9 | #233 | 56 |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | #288 | 39 |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 | #315 | 35 |
| 1895 | — | #279 | 40 | |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #249 | 48 |
| 1893 | #1,175 | 7 | #323 | 29 |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 | #348 | 29 |
| 1891 | — | #297 | 31 | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #376 | 22 |
| 1889 | — | #434 | 18 | |
| 1888 | #1,036 | 7 | #398 | 22 |
| 1887 | — | #409 | 17 | |
| 1886 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1885 | — | #521 | 13 | |
| 1884 | — | #547 | 12 | |
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lyle was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Lyle is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Maine#234 · 1 in 769
- Wisconsin#393 · 1 in 1,802
- Iowa#448 · 1 in 1,976
- Oregon#474 · 1 in 2,151
- Mississippi#522 · 1 in 2,167
Best ever in a state: #20 in South Dakota, 1928.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #234 | 5 | 1 in 769 |
| Wisconsin | #393 | 13 | 1 in 1,802 |
| Iowa | #448 | 7 | 1 in 1,976 |
| Oregon | #474 | 7 | 1 in 2,151 |
| Mississippi | #522 | 5 | 1 in 2,167 |
| Kentucky | #625 | 6 | 1 in 3,423 |
| Utah | #703 | 5 | 1 in 3,933 |
| Ohio | #710 | 12 | 1 in 4,378 |
| Indiana | #711 | 8 | 1 in 3,958 |
| Minnesota | #718 | 6 | 1 in 4,083 |
| Colorado | #756 | 6 | 1 in 4,475 |
| Illinois | #805 | 10 | 1 in 4,955 |
| Tennessee | #842 | 7 | 1 in 5,253 |
| Washington | #898 | 6 | 1 in 5,466 |
| Michigan | #905 | 7 | 1 in 5,742 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,004 | 7 | 1 in 7,466 |
| California | #1,085 | 19 | 1 in 9,235 |
| Florida | #1,256 | 9 | 1 in 10,615 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lyle
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 36 spots since 2020 (#1,010 → #1,046)
- 31 spots since 2015 (#1,077 → #1,046)
- Biggest jump: 241 spots in 1882
- Biggest drop: 180 spots in 1883
Rise & fade · boys
38 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1918 at #145 (993 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 47 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 120 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1880–1995
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,021
- Highest: 1 in 1,021 boys born in 1918 were named Lyle (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,095 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 17.2% of all boys named Lyle (10,163) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 126 | #398 (1888) | #564 |
| 1890s | 371 | #233 (1898) | #297 |
| 1900s | 674 | #195 (1906) | #241 |
| 1910s | 5,657 | #145 (1918) | #176 |
| 1920s | 10,163 | #146 (1922) | #152 |
| 1930s | 9,058 | #154 (1934) | #162 |
| 1940s | 8,618 | #168 (1941) | #193 |
| 1950s | 8,304 | #222 (1952) | #247 |
| 1960s | 5,259 | #290 (1960) | #343 |
| 1970s | 2,959 | #376 (1970) | #479 |
| 1980s | 2,536 | #512 (1986) | #556 |
| 1990s | 1,506 | #633 (1990) | #943 |
| 2000s | 942 | #1,233 (2003) | #1,516 |
| 2010s | 1,762 | #927 (2019) | #1,125 |
| 2020s | 1,255 | #1,006 (2021) | #1,040 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lyle ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: