Lynda

#4,546 for girls in 2025, 30 births · Last seen for boys in 1973 at #3,694
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1947 · 4,840 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
3 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
77,979
since 1882

Lynda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #77, 1947girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#4,54630—
2024#9,55610—
2023#7,24715—
2022#4,58230—
2021#4,24533—
2020#5,66721—
2019#4,00636—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,14735—
2016#4,34533—
2015#4,14435—
2014#2,84360—
2013#3,77840—
2012#3,46446—
2011#3,91638—
2010#3,51645—
2009#3,40948—
2008#2,71867—
2007#3,12555—
2006#2,28783—
2005#2,40773—
2004#2,58964—
2003#2,39369—
2002#2,49763—
2001#2,21173—
2000#1,92388—
1999#1,78689—
1998#1,84583—
1997#1,86479—
1996#1,80681—
1995#1,508104—
1994#1,444110—
1993#1,308129—
1992#1,60096—
1991#1,229139—
1990#1,163148—
1989#1,168140—
1988#1,077146—
1987#950170—
1986#873190—
1985#816200—
1984#728225—
1983#705242—
1982#556333—
1981#556335—
1980#594312—
1979#655266—
1978#567306—
1977#596289—
1976#564297—
1975#523336—
1974#488360—
1973#439436#3,6948
1972#390531—
1971#358679—
1970#319849—
1969#2781,015—
1968#2451,115#3,6736
1967#2471,147—
1966#2291,309—
1965#2071,605—
1964#1881,985—
1963#2141,590#4,0485
1962#2041,768—
1961#1872,038—
1960#1832,122—
1959#1812,024#2,8219
1958#1951,741#3,9445
1957#1951,814—
1956#1931,759—
1955#1781,885—
1954#1732,023#3,1767
1953#1532,305#3,4256
1952#1292,812—
1951#1163,026#3,3646
1950#1073,300#2,5809
1949#933,830—
1948#844,167#3,0107
1947#774,840#2,49810
1946#1093,000#3,1736
1945#1112,469#2,24210
1944#1132,370—
1943#1152,413#2,5639
1942#1322,107#2,7128
1941#1531,489#2,6568
1940#1651,267—
1939#219764—
1938#272540—
1937#371300—
1936#446203—
1935#618110—
1934#76477—
1933#80868—
1932#92358—
1931#1,02846—
1930#1,43429—
1929#1,19539—
1928#1,14744—
1927#1,72824—
1926#1,48330—
1925#1,53529—
1924#1,87222—
1923#1,55628—
1922#1,68225—
1921#1,86722—
1920#2,01519—
1919#2,06317—
1918#1,64524—
1917#2,10016—
1916#1,58123—
1915#1,80018—
1914#1,74015—
1913#1,67013—
1912#1,71911—
1911#2,4635—
1910#2,1406—
1909#1,21912—
1908#1,8626—
1907#1,14212—
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904——
1903#1,5926—
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898#1,2638—
1897——
1896#1,1229—
1895#1,2997—
1894——
1893#1,0239—
1892#1,2786—
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888#1,1366—
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884#1,0245—
1883——
1882#9085—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Lynda! It came in at #908, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1887, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Lynda is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMINew York: #474 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 8,267 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedIAIndiana: #319 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,576 girlsINOhio: #484 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,592 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #499 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,884 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedHITexas: #556 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,542 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Lynda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Indiana#319 · 1 in 3,576
  2. New York#474 · 1 in 8,267
  3. Ohio#484 · 1 in 8,592
  4. North Carolina#499 · 1 in 6,884
  5. Texas#556 · 1 in 4,542

Best ever in a state: #21 in Utah, 1947.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Indiana#31961 in 3,576
New York#474101 in 8,267
Ohio#48451 in 8,592
North Carolina#49951 in 6,884
Texas#556121 in 4,542
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lynda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 5,010 spots since 2024 (#9,556 → #4,546)
  • 1,121 spots since 2020 (#5,667 → #4,546)
  • 402 spots since 2015 (#4,144 → #4,546)
  • Biggest jump: 172 spots in 1936 (#618 → #446)
  • Biggest drop: 149 spots in 1983 (#556 → #705)
Rise & fade · girls
65 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1947 at #77 (4,840 births)
  • Births halved by 1953, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1947–1949
  • Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1932–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 366
  • Highest: 1 in 366 girls born in 1947 were named Lynda (0.27%)
  • Latest: 1 in 53,576 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 35.8% of all girls named Lynda (27,952) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s16#908 (1882)#1,023
1890s39#1,023 (1893)#1,197
1900s42#1,142 (1907)#1,508
1910s148#1,581 (1916)#1,892
1920s282#1,147 (1928)#1,608
1930s2,195#219 (1939)#688
1940s27,952#77 (1947)#115
1950s22,689#107 (1950)#162
1960s15,694#183 (1960)#218
1970s4,349#319 (1970)#490
1980s2,293#556 (1981)#802
1990s1,058#1,163 (1990)#1,555
2000s683#1,923 (2000)#2,556
2010s400#2,843 (2014)#3,852
2020s139#4,245 (2021)#5,974

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lynda in 1933

girls
#808
68 births · 1 in 14,823 girls

Top girls' names in 1933

  1. #1Mary55,517
  2. #2Betty31,531
  3. #3Barbara26,949
  4. #4Dorothy22,054
  5. #5Joan19,294
  6. #6Patricia18,632
  7. #7Margaret15,241
  8. #8Helen14,644
  9. #9Shirley14,320
  10. #10Doris12,025
  11. #808Lynda68
More about 1933

girls

1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 14,823 of them was named Lynda, which outranked 83.4% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lynda
  1. #801Patrica69
  2. #801Vergie69
  3. #801Vonda69
  4. #808Lynda68
  5. #808Cecil68
  6. #808Crystal68
  7. #808Larue68
  8. #814Carleen67
  9. #814Carrol67
  10. #814Elois67

Tied with 5 names at #808; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,022Rheta#1,754 → #732
  2. ↑ 930Joellen#1,877 → #947
  3. ↑ 583Veola#1,568 → #985
  4. ↑ 483Sharlene#1,162 → #679
  5. ↑ 475Louetta#1,448 → #973
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Golda#969 → #1,364
  2. ↓ 322Louis#940 → #1,262
  3. ↓ 298Bebe#899 → #1,197
  4. ↓ 291Clyde#998 → #1,289
  5. ↓ 291Mariam#998 → #1,289

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →