Lyndall
- Last seen for girls in 1968 at #7,016
- Last seen for boys in 1970 at #4,230
- Given to girls 67.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1901 · 9 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 609since 1901
Lyndall over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #3,673 | 6 |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1964 | — | #2,665 | 10 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #2,848 | 9 |
| 1961 | — | #1,823 | 20 | |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | #2,121 | 15 |
| 1959 | — | #2,200 | 14 | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | #2,822 | 9 |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #2,798 | 9 |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #2,964 | 8 |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #2,514 | 10 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 | #2,438 | 10 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,279 | 19 | #3,096 | 7 |
| 1946 | #2,318 | 17 | #2,690 | 8 |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #2,199 | 16 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,994 | 19 | #2,074 | 13 |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,963 | 9 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,579 | 11 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #2,735 | 10 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 | #2,062 | 12 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 | #2,529 | 9 |
| 1934 | #2,289 | 13 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #2,973 | 11 | — | |
| 1923 | #3,641 | 8 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,186 | 17 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,378 | 15 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,263 | 16 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #2,063 | 17 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,376 | 14 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,316 | 14 | — | |
| 1916 | #2,133 | 15 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,883 | 17 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,265 | 10 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1901
The first year at least five girls were named Lyndall! It came in at #1,136, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1902–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lyndall is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Lyndall in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Lyndall
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1968
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1901
- Peaked 1901 at #1,136 (9 births)
- Births halved by 1903, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 26,594
- Highest: 1 in 26,594 girls born in 1901 were named Lyndall (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 328,078 girls born in 1968 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
- 22.3% of all girls named Lyndall (136) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1958
- Mostly girls until 1957, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 27 | #1,136 (1901) | #1,610 |
| 1910s | 107 | #1,883 (1915) | #2,253 |
| 1920s | 106 | #2,186 (1922) | #2,896 |
| 1930s | 120 | #1,970 (1933) | #2,540 |
| 1940s | 136 | #1,994 (1943) | #2,638 |
| 1950s | 84 | #2,694 (1951) | #4,006 |
| 1960s | 29 | #4,773 (1960) | #6,150 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lyndall ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: