Mabel

#201 for girls in 2025, 1,522 births · Last seen for boys in 1940 at #3,459
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1891 · 2,029 births
Debut · girls
808 births
In top 100 · girls
43 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
142,284
since 1880

Mabel over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201971peak #15, 1891girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2011,522—
2024#2221,385—
2023#2781,131—
2022#3101,027—
2021#375831—
2020#428718—
2019#440712—
2018#439727—
2017#451703—
2016#515605—
2015#578529—
2014#668427—
2013#711393—
2012#1,044241—
2011#1,224196—
2010#1,328177—
2009#1,538147—
2008#1,631139—
2007#1,713127—
2006#1,788116—
2005#1,838106—
2004#2,03090—
2003#1,88597—
2002#1,89793—
2001#2,03583—
2000#2,14175—
1999#1,77090—
1998#1,95877—
1997#2,87442—
1996#2,28258—
1995#2,42153—
1994#1,86276—
1993#2,09065—
1992#1,79880—
1991#1,87775—
1990#1,82878—
1989#1,98164—
1988#1,354105—
1987#1,49886—
1986#1,63872—
1985#1,71067—
1984#1,51175—
1983#1,53173—
1982#1,56675—
1981#1,42386—
1980#1,54276—
1979#1,60570—
1978#1,69062—
1977#1,63764—
1976#1,39776—
1975#1,49868—
1974#1,30082—
1973#1,45865—
1972#1,43268—
1971#1,40575—
1970#1,58460—
1969#1,20186—
1968#1,31171—
1967#1,26972—
1966#1,16184—
1965#1,07994—
1964#945124—
1963#959122—
1962#945126—
1961#914140—
1960#915134—
1959#871140—
1958#888132—
1957#754175—
1956#715181—
1955#672194—
1954#706173—
1953#636197—
1952#592216—
1951#608200—
1950#547228—
1949#514253—
1948#453311—
1947#443345—
1946#421334—
1945#379344—
1944#351387—
1943#319478—
1942#304513—
1941#285507—
1940#265548#3,4595
1939#256593—
1938#245674—
1937#233697#3,5185
1936#221743—
1935#208826—
1934#209850#3,2776
1933#196875#3,0047
1932#1711,111#3,3616
1931#1741,060#3,3906
1930#1501,369#2,7819
1929#1471,516#2,7669
1928#1351,742#3,3577
1927#1331,954#4,2105
1926#1272,076#3,1398
1925#1182,292#3,1558
1924#1082,652#4,3475
1923#1022,696#3,4677
1922#992,894#3,8726
1921#853,336#4,3225
1920#833,364#2,9679
1919#783,405#3,3917
1918#743,636#2,8829
1917#683,499#1,81517
1916#653,680#3,5166
1915#623,683#2,07013
1914#583,131#1,86812
1913#562,741#2,0928
1912#462,714#1,22315
1911#432,171#1,11710
1910#452,123#1,04510
1909#412,007#89311
1908#372,096#77912
1907#362,069#81511
1906#342,054#79810
1905#292,178#1,0027
1904#272,172#68612
1903#252,163#8468
1902#242,280#65112
1901#232,097#59612
1900#252,509#9688
1899#222,127#9286
1898#232,331#8857
1897#222,222#68110
1896#212,283—
1895#202,359—
1894#202,221#9546
1893#212,191#65010
1892#192,170—
1891#152,029#7008
1890#172,058#7398
1889#161,947#7897
1888#171,830—
1887#181,494#9215
1886#201,422#8456
1885#201,349#7657
1884#201,270—
1883#231,086#7996
1882#23997—
1881#23893—
1880#22808—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Mabel was already there! It came in at #22, and was given to 808 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1995–1997, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.

Where Mabel is popular in 1971

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMINew York: #739 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 7,826 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #982 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 16,071 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,846 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 29,680 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Mabel, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New York#739 · 1 in 7,826
  2. Pennsylvania#982 · 1 in 16,071
  3. California#1,846 · 1 in 29,680

Best ever in a state: #11 in Hawaii, 1916.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New York#739161 in 7,826
Pennsylvania#98251 in 16,071
California#1,84651 in 29,680
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Mabel
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 21 spots since 2024 (#222 → #201)
  • 227 spots since 2020 (#428 → #201)
  • 377 spots since 2015 (#578 → #201)
  • Biggest jump: 333 spots in 2013 (#1,044 → #711)
  • Biggest drop: 134 spots in 1958 (#754 → #888)
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1891 at #15 (2,029 births)
  • Births halved by 1933, 42 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 43 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1880–1922
  • Top 1,000: 98 yrs · run 1880–1964
Share of babies · girls
1 in 91
  • Highest: 1 in 91 girls born in 1891 were named Mabel (1.1%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,056 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
  • 21.6% of all girls named Mabel (30,783) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #15 (1891) → #2,874 (1997) → #201 (2025)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s13,096#16 (1889)#20
1890s21,991#15 (1891)#20
1900s21,625#23 (1901)#30
1910s30,783#43 (1911)#60
1920s24,522#83 (1920)#114
1930s8,798#150 (1930)#206
1940s4,020#265 (1940)#373
1950s1,836#547 (1950)#699
1960s1,053#914 (1961)#1,070
1970s690#1,300 (1974)#1,501
1980s779#1,354 (1988)#1,575
1990s694#1,770 (1999)#2,076
2000s1,073#1,538 (2009)#1,850
2010s4,710#439 (2018)#740
2020s6,614#201 (2025)#302

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Mabel in 1971

girls
#1,405
75 births · 1 in 22,184 girls

Top girls' names in 1971

  1. #1Jennifer56,771
  2. #2Michelle33,160
  3. #3Lisa32,907
  4. #4Kimberly30,708
  5. #5Amy26,237
  6. #6Angela25,901
  7. #7Melissa23,875
  8. #8Tammy17,656
  9. #9Mary16,703
  10. #10Julie15,322
  11. #1,405Mabel75
More about 1971

girls

1,663,823 girls got a published name in 1971; 1 in 22,184 of them was named Mabel, which outranked 85.4% of the 9,645 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Mabel
  1. #1,389Risa76
  2. #1,389Rowena76
  3. #1,389Toby76
  4. #1,405Mabel75
  5. #1,405Bonny75
  6. #1,405Clare75
  7. #1,405Dalia75
  8. #1,415Avis74
  9. #1,415Charleen74
  10. #1,415Iva74

Tied with 9 names at #1,405; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1970
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,115Yesenia#2,522 → #407
  2. ↑ 1,431Shayla#2,267 → #836
  3. ↑ 853Ebony#1,681 → #828
  4. ↑ 749Consuela#1,706 → #957
  5. ↑ 510Candida#1,196 → #686
Fallers
  1. ↓ 572Sebrina#916 → #1,488
  2. ↓ 382Janene#684 → #1,066
  3. ↓ 375Treena#989 → #1,364
  4. ↓ 356Tisa#910 → #1,266
  5. ↓ 351Shaun#929 → #1,280

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1971 →