Macey
- #1,611 for girls in 2025, 129 births
- Last seen for boys in 2000 at #8,209
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2001 · 561 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,536since 1900
Macey over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Macey has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,611 | 129 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,414 | 158 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,645 | 126 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,692 | 123 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,830 | 110 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,398 | 156 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,392 | 161 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,338 | 168 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,204 | 201 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,179 | 212 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,065 | 248 | — | |
| 2014 | #923 | 291 | — | |
| 2013 | #918 | 277 | — | |
| 2012 | #833 | 322 | — | |
| 2011 | #738 | 374 | — | |
| 2010 | #709 | 403 | — | |
| 2009 | #703 | 413 | — | |
| 2008 | #646 | 478 | — | |
| 2007 | #654 | 453 | — | |
| 2006 | #636 | 453 | — | |
| 2005 | #540 | 536 | — | |
| 2004 | #605 | 458 | — | |
| 2003 | #558 | 495 | — | |
| 2002 | #573 | 455 | — | |
| 2001 | #494 | 561 | — | |
| 2000 | #514 | 518 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #533 | 474 | — | |
| 1998 | #608 | 395 | — | |
| 1997 | #693 | 310 | — | |
| 1996 | #743 | 284 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #734 | 279 | — | |
| 1994 | #805 | 251 | — | |
| 1993 | #812 | 246 | — | |
| 1992 | #842 | 236 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #1,016 | 181 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,072 | 165 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,965 | 65 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,805 | 24 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,915 | 33 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,028 | 20 | — | |
| 1985 | #4,282 | 18 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,148 | 13 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,716 | 15 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | — | |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | — | |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,950 | 16 | — | |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #4,201 | 5 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #4,347 | 5 | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | — | |
| 1920 | — | #4,286 | 5 | |
| 1919 | #3,005 | 10 | — | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #3,897 | 5 | |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #2,915 | 6 |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1900
The first year at least five girls were named Macey! It came in at #1,932, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1900–1901, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Macey is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Colorado#703 · 1 in 3,332
- Minnesota#731 · 1 in 3,580
- Wisconsin#791 · 1 in 4,052
- Ohio#1,035 · 1 in 5,909
- Washington#1,046 · 1 in 5,772
Best ever in a state: #147 in Montana, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | #703 | 7 | 1 in 3,332 |
| Minnesota | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Wisconsin | #791 | 5 | 1 in 4,052 |
| Ohio | #1,035 | 8 | 1 in 5,909 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,108 | 7 | 1 in 6,670 |
| Illinois | #1,405 | 5 | 1 in 8,866 |
| Florida | #1,685 | 7 | 1 in 12,395 |
| Texas | #1,902 | 11 | 1 in 14,595 |
| California | #2,767 | 6 | 1 in 26,954 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Macey
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 213 spots since 2020 (#1,398 → #1,611)
- Biggest jump: 174 spots in 1992
- Biggest drop: 142 spots in 2015
Rise & fade · girls
101 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 2001 at #494 (561 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 23 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 1992–2014
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,210
- Highest: 1 in 3,210 girls born in 2001 were named Macey (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,459 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 41.8% of all girls named Macey (4,820) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 16 | #1,594 (1902) | #1,862 |
| 1910s | 30 | #2,900 (1915) | #3,018 |
| 1920s | 6 | #4,464 (1921) | #4,464 |
| 1930s | 12 | #3,658 (1930) | #3,938 |
| 1940s | 10 | #4,420 (1941) | #4,858 |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 30 | #5,817 (1965) | #6,141 |
| 1970s | 105 | #3,911 (1977) | #5,213 |
| 1980s | 227 | #1,965 (1989) | #4,521 |
| 1990s | 2,821 | #533 (1999) | #786 |
| 2000s | 4,820 | #494 (2001) | #592 |
| 2010s | 2,657 | #709 (2010) | #1,030 |
| 2020s | 802 | #1,398 (2020) | #1,598 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Macey ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: