Mackenna
#3,211 for girls in 2025, 49 births · Last seen for boys in 1995 at #6,407
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 187 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,660since 1986
Mackenna over time
Rank among girls' names. Mackenna has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,211 | 49 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,976 | 55 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,466 | 72 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,490 | 72 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,186 | 85 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,416 | 72 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,043 | 93 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,130 | 89 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,384 | 76 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,875 | 109 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,937 | 104 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,010 | 98 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,646 | 129 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,510 | 147 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,503 | 148 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,328 | 177 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,593 | 141 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,320 | 187 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,419 | 167 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,351 | 172 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,406 | 152 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,498 | 134 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,446 | 136 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,404 | 137 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,368 | 139 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,395 | 133 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,482 | 116 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,567 | 105 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,884 | 78 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,577 | 99 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,394 | 54 | #6,407 | 8 |
| 1994 | #2,988 | 39 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,987 | 26 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,866 | 27 | — | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | — | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Mackenna! It came in at #10,912, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1987, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Mackenna is popular in 1996
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#993 · 1 in 8,207
- Pennsylvania#1,142 · 1 in 12,110
- Illinois#1,154 · 1 in 10,207
Best ever in a state: #211 in New Hampshire, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #993 | 28 | 1 in 8,207 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,142 | 5 | 1 in 12,110 |
| Illinois | #1,154 | 7 | 1 in 10,207 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mackenna
- 235 spots since 2024 (#2,976 → #3,211)
- 795 spots since 2020 (#2,416 → #3,211)
- 1,274 spots since 2015 (#1,937 → #3,211)
- Debuted 1986
- Peaked 2008 at #1,320 (187 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 10,043 girls born in 2010 were named Mackenna (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 32,801 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,320 in 2008, was only 1 in 10,112 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 40.9% of all girls named Mackenna (1,498) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 26 | #8,391 (1988) | #9,847 |
| 1990s | 561 | #1,482 (1999) | #3,790 |
| 2000s | 1,498 | #1,320 (2008) | #1,420 |
| 2010s | 1,170 | #1,328 (2010) | #1,837 |
| 2020s | 405 | #2,186 (2021) | #2,624 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mackenna in 1996
Top girls' names in 1996
More about 1996
girls
1,753,007 girls got a published name in 1996; 1 in 17,707 of them was named Mackenna, which outranked 90.1% of the 15,894 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,571Nyla100
- #1,571Ramona100
- #1,571Tarah100
- #1,577Mackenna99
- #1,577Cari99
- #1,577Ginger99
- #1,577Jordin99
- #1,583Analisa98
- #1,583Anneliese98
- #1,583Brittny98
Tied with 5 names at #1,577; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.