Mackenzie
- #228 for girls in 2025, 1,343 births
- #1,668 for boys in 2025, 99 births
- Given to girls 94.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2001 · 6,934 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 23 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 141,274since 1973
Mackenzie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #228 | 1,343 | #1,668 | 99 |
| 2024 | #200 | 1,524 | #1,862 | 86 |
| 2023 | #167 | 1,744 | #1,817 | 88 |
| 2022 | #142 | 2,036 | #2,039 | 74 |
| 2021 | #123 | 2,277 | #2,225 | 63 |
| 2020 | #119 | 2,297 | #2,658 | 47 |
| 2019 | #111 | 2,591 | #2,736 | 46 |
| 2018 | #106 | 2,827 | #3,240 | 35 |
| 2017 | #100 | 2,962 | #3,249 | 35 |
| 2016 | #85 | 3,410 | #3,776 | 28 |
| 2015 | #73 | 3,869 | #3,591 | 30 |
| 2014 | #69 | 4,160 | #3,532 | 30 |
| 2013 | #62 | 4,024 | #2,763 | 42 |
| 2012 | #71 | 3,764 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #68 | 3,799 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2010 | #68 | 3,883 | #3,181 | 35 |
| 2009 | #77 | 3,902 | #2,753 | 44 |
| 2008 | #65 | 4,474 | #3,057 | 38 |
| 2007 | #65 | 4,628 | #2,372 | 54 |
| 2006 | #53 | 5,205 | #1,943 | 69 |
| 2005 | #51 | 5,199 | #1,659 | 81 |
| 2004 | #44 | 5,728 | #1,367 | 106 |
| 2003 | #45 | 5,865 | #1,529 | 84 |
| 2002 | #42 | 6,268 | #1,079 | 139 |
| 2001 | #40 | 6,934 | #912 | 171 |
| 2000 | #43 | 6,350 | #697 | 252 |
| 1999 | #52 | 5,426 | #630 | 285 |
| 1998 | #64 | 4,890 | #625 | 292 |
| 1997 | #71 | 4,491 | #526 | 380 |
| 1996 | #75 | 4,597 | #470 | 465 |
| 1995 | #88 | 3,963 | #398 | 579 |
| 1994 | #102 | 3,196 | #366 | 648 |
| 1993 | #113 | 2,897 | #401 | 575 |
| 1992 | #125 | 2,673 | #411 | 548 |
| 1991 | #198 | 1,494 | #495 | 398 |
| 1990 | #247 | 1,151 | #524 | 355 |
| 1989 | #307 | 855 | #531 | 327 |
| 1988 | #321 | 774 | #571 | 261 |
| 1987 | #341 | 711 | #607 | 223 |
| 1986 | #439 | 490 | #738 | 151 |
| 1985 | #482 | 433 | #889 | 104 |
| 1984 | #555 | 337 | #1,000 | 79 |
| 1983 | #635 | 271 | #1,347 | 48 |
| 1982 | #693 | 254 | #1,539 | 40 |
| 1981 | #700 | 240 | #1,396 | 46 |
| 1980 | #721 | 232 | #1,410 | 45 |
| 1979 | #864 | 179 | #1,510 | 39 |
| 1978 | #694 | 229 | #1,616 | 34 |
| 1977 | #666 | 237 | #1,268 | 49 |
| 1976 | #837 | 165 | #1,427 | 39 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #2,751 | 14 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Mackenzie! It came in at #7,435, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1973–1974, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Mackenzie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#76 · 1 in 253
- Connecticut#84 · 1 in 371
- Maryland#97 · 1 in 444
- New Jersey#100 · 1 in 493
- Massachusetts#112 · 1 in 511
Best ever in a state: #6 in Wyoming, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #76 | 15 | 1 in 253 |
| Connecticut | #84 | 31 | 1 in 371 |
| Maryland | #97 | 45 | 1 in 444 |
| New Jersey | #100 | 72 | 1 in 493 |
| Massachusetts | #112 | 47 | 1 in 511 |
| District of Columbia | #119 | 6 | 1 in 337 |
| New York | #137 | 119 | 1 in 658 |
| Virginia | #141 | 54 | 1 in 625 |
| Pennsylvania | #143 | 74 | 1 in 631 |
| Delaware | #167 | 5 | 1 in 451 |
| Illinois | #176 | 56 | 1 in 792 |
| Ohio | #185 | 60 | 1 in 788 |
| Minnesota | #193 | 28 | 1 in 767 |
| Colorado | #200 | 30 | 1 in 778 |
| Indiana | #201 | 34 | 1 in 821 |
| Oregon | #223 | 16 | 1 in 816 |
| Michigan | #228 | 39 | 1 in 916 |
| Georgia | #247 | 42 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Iowa | #248 | 14 | 1 in 841 |
| Florida | #263 | 72 | 1 in 1,205 |
| Missouri | #265 | 23 | 1 in 1,056 |
| Wisconsin | #265 | 20 | 1 in 1,013 |
| California | #269 | 122 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Louisiana | #271 | 16 | 1 in 1,023 |
| Tennessee | #282 | 27 | 1 in 1,188 |
| Kentucky | #286 | 15 | 1 in 1,150 |
| Nevada | #292 | 9 | 1 in 1,022 |
| North Carolina | #297 | 37 | 1 in 1,256 |
| South Carolina | #311 | 16 | 1 in 1,143 |
| Oklahoma | #340 | 12 | 1 in 1,232 |
| Idaho | #351 | 6 | 1 in 1,194 |
| Texas | #381 | 90 | 1 in 1,784 |
| Arizona | #388 | 17 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Mississippi | #441 | 6 | 1 in 1,483 |
| Kansas | #445 | 7 | 1 in 1,687 |
| Arkansas | #489 | 6 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Washington | #511 | 13 | 1 in 2,220 |
| Alabama | #819 | 5 | 1 in 3,664 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mackenzie
- 109 spots since 2020 (#119 → #228)
- Biggest jump: 3,533 spots in 1976
- Biggest drop: 170 spots in 1979
- Debuted 1973
- Peaked 2001 at #40 (6,934 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1995–2017
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Highest: 1 in 260 girls born in 2001 were named Mackenzie (0.39%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,197 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
- 38.6% of all girls named Mackenzie (54,553) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1974, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 836 | #666 (1977) | #3,221 |
| 1980s | 4,597 | #307 (1989) | #519 |
| 1990s | 34,778 | #52 (1999) | #114 |
| 2000s | 54,553 | #40 (2001) | #53 |
| 2010s | 35,289 | #62 (2013) | #81 |
| 2020s | 11,221 | #119 (2020) | #163 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mackenzie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: