Mackinley
- #7,885 for girls in 2025, 13 births
- Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
- Given to girls 54.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 28 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 431since 1996
Mackinley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,885 | 13 | — | |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #5,390 | 23 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #5,028 | 26 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #5,955 | 20 | #8,166 | 9 |
| 2020 | #7,559 | 14 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #7,716 | 14 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #4,768 | 28 | #8,819 | 8 |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #7,602 | 15 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #5,458 | 24 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #13,069 | 7 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #5,834 | 22 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #5,710 | 23 | #6,001 | 14 |
| 2011 | #6,855 | 18 | #5,200 | 17 |
| 2010 | #7,880 | 15 | #5,478 | 16 |
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #8,310 | 9 |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | #7,427 | 10 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #6,634 | 11 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | #5,813 | 13 |
| 2003 | #8,505 | 12 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | #4,676 | 16 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #3,376 | 23 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #4,413 | 15 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #4,668 | 13 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #4,022 | 16 |
| 1995 | — | #5,124 | 11 | |
| 1994 | — | #4,094 | 15 | |
| 1993 | — | #5,360 | 10 | |
| 1992 | — | #7,422 | 6 | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1996
The first year at least five girls were named Mackinley! It came in at #10,567, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1996–1997, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Mackinley is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Mackinley in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Mackinley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 2,386 spots since 2024 (#10,271 → #7,885)
- 326 spots since 2020 (#7,559 → #7,885)
- 2,427 spots since 2015 (#5,458 → #7,885)
Rise & fade · girls
22 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1996
- Peaked 2018 at #4,768 (28 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 60,753
- Highest: 1 in 60,753 girls born in 2018 were named Mackinley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 123,636 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 42.5% of all girls named Mackinley (183) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2011
- Mostly boys until 2010, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33 | #7,104 (1998) | #10,282 |
| 2000s | 110 | #5,822 (2001) | #9,948 |
| 2010s | 183 | #4,768 (2018) | #7,170 |
| 2020s | 105 | #5,028 (2022) | #7,015 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mackinley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: