Maddox
- #2,607 for girls in 2025, 66 births
- #209 for boys in 2025, 1,664 births
- Given to boys 96.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2017 · 3,044 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 47,119since 1995
Maddox over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Maddox has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,607 | 66 | #209 | 1,664 |
| 2024 | #2,150 | 88 | #217 | 1,668 |
| 2023 | #2,002 | 98 | #195 | 1,890 |
| 2022 | #1,942 | 102 | #179 | 2,108 |
| 2021 | #1,841 | 109 | #173 | 2,220 |
| 2020 | #2,441 | 71 | #170 | 2,293 |
| 2019 | #1,875 | 107 | #156 | 2,483 |
| 2018 | #1,937 | 102 | #140 | 2,811 |
| 2017 | #1,943 | 103 | #136 | 3,044 |
| 2016 | #1,735 | 120 | #143 | 2,909 |
| 2015 | #2,123 | 90 | #148 | 2,789 |
| 2014 | #2,049 | 95 | #163 | 2,579 |
| 2013 | #2,279 | 81 | #170 | 2,418 |
| 2012 | #2,866 | 60 | #168 | 2,312 |
| 2011 | #2,838 | 61 | #169 | 2,222 |
| 2010 | #2,803 | 62 | #179 | 2,108 |
| 2009 | #2,826 | 62 | #181 | 2,103 |
| 2008 | #3,859 | 41 | #208 | 1,858 |
| 2007 | #2,822 | 64 | #227 | 1,628 |
| 2006 | #2,485 | 74 | #235 | 1,501 |
| 2005 | #2,457 | 71 | #277 | 1,207 |
| 2004 | #2,927 | 54 | #378 | 728 |
| 2003 | #5,419 | 22 | #582 | 378 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #1,372 | 96 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #3,410 | 25 |
| 2000 | — | #4,785 | 15 | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | — | #3,849 | 18 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,059 | 16 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,535 | 10 | |
| 1995 | — | #7,792 | 6 | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1995
The first year at least five boys were named Maddox! It came in at #7,792, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1995, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Maddox is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Vermont#64 · 1 in 173
- West Virginia#74 · 1 in 257
- Wyoming#89 · 1 in 218
- Mississippi#108 · 1 in 387
- Maine#126 · 1 in 384
Best ever in a state: #32 in Hawaii, 2017.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #64 | 7 | 1 in 173 |
| West Virginia | #74 | 24 | 1 in 257 |
| Wyoming | #89 | 5 | 1 in 218 |
| Mississippi | #108 | 28 | 1 in 387 |
| Maine | #126 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| South Dakota | #127 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| Arkansas | #141 | 25 | 1 in 503 |
| Kansas | #142 | 26 | 1 in 540 |
| Tennessee | #144 | 66 | 1 in 557 |
| Alabama | #151 | 38 | 1 in 566 |
| Oklahoma | #153 | 31 | 1 in 570 |
| Missouri | #158 | 44 | 1 in 632 |
| Nevada | #160 | 19 | 1 in 594 |
| North Carolina | #160 | 80 | 1 in 643 |
| Iowa | #162 | 26 | 1 in 532 |
| Louisiana | #162 | 31 | 1 in 617 |
| Kentucky | #163 | 33 | 1 in 622 |
| Pennsylvania | #169 | 76 | 1 in 688 |
| Ohio | #172 | 77 | 1 in 682 |
| Georgia | #173 | 72 | 1 in 698 |
| Idaho | #173 | 15 | 1 in 575 |
| Montana | #173 | 7 | 1 in 538 |
| Virginia | #174 | 52 | 1 in 716 |
| South Carolina | #178 | 31 | 1 in 684 |
| New Hampshire | #188 | 7 | 1 in 643 |
| Nebraska | #196 | 13 | 1 in 678 |
| Indiana | #200 | 42 | 1 in 754 |
| Rhode Island | #200 | 5 | 1 in 625 |
| Delaware | #203 | 5 | 1 in 589 |
| Florida | #207 | 104 | 1 in 919 |
| Arizona | #225 | 36 | 1 in 909 |
| North Dakota | #226 | 5 | 1 in 671 |
| Texas | #236 | 167 | 1 in 1,048 |
| Colorado | #237 | 27 | 1 in 994 |
| Minnesota | #243 | 25 | 1 in 980 |
| Washington | #246 | 31 | 1 in 1,058 |
| Michigan | #264 | 38 | 1 in 1,058 |
| Maryland | #268 | 20 | 1 in 1,145 |
| Oregon | #281 | 15 | 1 in 1,004 |
| Connecticut | #296 | 10 | 1 in 1,321 |
| New York | #301 | 61 | 1 in 1,384 |
| Utah | #302 | 16 | 1 in 1,229 |
| New Mexico | #311 | 6 | 1 in 1,083 |
| Illinois | #316 | 34 | 1 in 1,457 |
| Massachusetts | #335 | 16 | 1 in 1,689 |
| California | #337 | 105 | 1 in 1,671 |
| New Jersey | #344 | 24 | 1 in 1,657 |
| Wisconsin | #393 | 13 | 1 in 1,802 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maddox
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 8 spots since 2024 (#217 → #209)
- 39 spots since 2020 (#170 → #209)
- Biggest jump: 790 spots in 2003
- Biggest drop: 22 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · boys
22 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2017 at #136 (3,044 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 23 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 2003–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 608
- Highest: 1 in 608 boys born in 2017 were named Maddox (0.16%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,026 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 54.5% of all boys named Maddox (25,675) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62 | #3,849 (1998) | #5,310 |
| 2000s | 9,539 | #181 (2009) | #1,166 |
| 2010s | 25,675 | #136 (2017) | #157 |
| 2020s | 11,843 | #170 (2020) | #191 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Maddox ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: