Maddux
- #9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births
- #1,529 for boys in 2025, 113 births
- Given to boys 93.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2018 · 222 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 3,833since 1996
Maddux over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | #1,529 | 113 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #1,397 | 134 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #1,271 | 151 |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | #1,237 | 159 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #1,253 | 152 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #1,111 | 177 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #1,080 | 185 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #942 | 222 |
| 2017 | #6,044 | 20 | #972 | 213 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #985 | 207 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #1,049 | 189 |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | #991 | 209 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,162 | 155 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #1,212 | 147 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #1,183 | 149 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #1,056 | 182 |
| 2009 | — | #978 | 203 | |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #1,037 | 183 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #1,139 | 157 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #1,194 | 140 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #1,209 | 131 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #1,379 | 104 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #2,238 | 48 |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #2,817 | 33 |
| 2001 | — | #7,536 | 8 | |
| 2000 | — | #4,204 | 18 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,704 | 20 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,413 | 15 | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #3,877 | 17 |
| 1996 | — | #4,878 | 12 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1996
The first year at least five boys were named Maddux! It came in at #4,878, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2001, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
Where Maddux is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Iowa#493 · 1 in 2,305
- Tennessee#592 · 1 in 3,064
- Utah#703 · 1 in 3,933
- South Carolina#743 · 1 in 4,240
- Georgia#853 · 1 in 5,022
Best ever in a state: #171 in North Dakota, 2009.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #493 | 6 | 1 in 2,305 |
| Tennessee | #592 | 12 | 1 in 3,064 |
| Utah | #703 | 5 | 1 in 3,933 |
| South Carolina | #743 | 5 | 1 in 4,240 |
| Georgia | #853 | 10 | 1 in 5,022 |
| Indiana | #949 | 5 | 1 in 6,333 |
| Florida | #1,478 | 7 | 1 in 13,648 |
| Texas | #2,285 | 6 | 1 in 29,175 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maddux
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 418 spots since 2020 (#1,111 → #1,529)
- Biggest jump: 171 spots in 2014
- Biggest drop: 138 spots in 2019
Rise & fade · boys
22 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1996
- Peaked 2018 at #942 (222 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 5 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 5 yrs · run 2016–2018
Share of babies · boys
1 in 8,181
- Highest: 1 in 8,181 boys born in 2018 were named Maddux (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,116 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 48.5% of all boys named Maddux (1,858) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64 | #3,704 (1999) | #4,218 |
| 2000s | 1,025 | #978 (2009) | #2,373 |
| 2010s | 1,858 | #942 (2018) | #1,063 |
| 2020s | 886 | #1,111 (2020) | #1,300 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Maddux ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: