Mae

#500 for girls in 2025, 594 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1895 · 1,193 births
Debut · girls
344 births
In top 100 · girls
41 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
114,835
since 1880

Mae over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201964peak #52, 1895girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#500594—
2024#529578—
2023#506599#12,2395
2022#511614—
2021#501622—
2020#572511—
2019#548556—
2018#553561—
2017#637461—
2016#579535—
2015#588513—
2014#686413—
2013#676419—
2012#746373—
2011#802337—
2010#979259—
2009#1,063240—
2008#1,123230—
2007#1,205208—
2006#1,173207—
2005#1,277175—
2004#1,380151—
2003#1,612119—
2002#1,376140—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,402132—
1999#1,66799—
1998#1,84583—
1997#2,07068—
1996#2,34056—
1995#2,18961—
1994#2,07966—
1993#2,67645—
1992#2,43353—
1991#2,09264—
1990#2,17459—
1989#2,11958—
1988#2,09355—
1987#1,91859—
1986#2,02553—
1985#1,94856—
1984#1,72663—
1983#1,77060—
1982#1,73564—
1981#1,84859—
1980#1,50279—
1979#1,69465—
1978#1,54671—
1977#1,46875—
1976#1,49969—
1975#1,29186—
1974#1,25287—
1973#1,19490—
1972#1,16992—
1971#1,40575—
1970#1,026120—
1969#943127—
1968#984112—
1967#826147—
1966#730181—
1965#720189—
1964#724205—
1963#643247—
1962#627259—
1961#517358—
1960#519347—
1959#509368—
1958#495374#3,5596
1957#437459#3,2577
1956#424465—
1955#366575#2,7649
1954#371554—
1953#326640—
1952#319640#3,3736
1951#290730—
1950#287737#2,7708
1949#274792#3,2986
1948#252884—
1947#253859#2,6719
1946#249806#3,5255
1945#225854#1,85214
1944#224868#2,19511
1943#224876#2,5639
1942#204997#1,73017
1941#191993#2,6568
1940#1851,018#3,1306
1939#1801,060#1,79515
1938#1831,083#2,4799
1937#1851,071#1,82815
1936#1701,136#2,30110
1935#1601,267#1,83715
1934#1471,384#1,86015
1933#1481,290#1,90514
1932#1411,456#1,77717
1931#1411,462#2,32811
1930#1371,650#1,75318
1929#1321,767#2,00215
1928#1301,808#1,82218
1927#1252,072#2,03416
1926#1182,261#1,51524
1925#1162,332#1,93517
1924#1142,369#2,82210
1923#1092,428#2,44612
1922#1112,404#2,80110
1921#1102,589#2,80410
1920#992,730#2,23114
1919#992,634#2,06315
1918#952,756#2,26013
1917#962,507#2,9568
1916#922,607#2,54310
1915#892,486#2,07013
1914#852,049#2,9156
1913#791,814#1,36515
1912#741,775#1,61910
1911#701,449#1,5376
1910#651,453#1,1938
1909#681,230#75614
1908#571,384#1,0218
1907#571,375—
1906#601,225—
1905#601,284#78610
1904#581,214#1,2055
1903#581,192—
1902#531,261#7949
1901#541,140—
1900#541,406#83610
1899#591,035—
1898#561,239#1,0026
1897#541,144—
1896#551,148—
1895#521,193#1,0795
1894#541,134—
1893#531,071#9076
1892#521,101#8617
1891#54933—
1890#58920#8846
1889#57883—
1888#60836—
1887#58680—
1886#61641—
1885#63578#9365
1884#64542—
1883#70423—
1882#71406—
1881#75314—
1880#71344—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Mae was already there! It came in at #71, and was given to 344 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1981–1996, when fewer than 67 girls a year got the name.

Where Mae is popular in 1964

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMNIllinois: #721 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 9,817 girlsILWisconsin: #482 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,601 girlsWIMichigan: #855 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 15,628 girlsMINew York: #1,257 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 26,782 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedINOhio: #610 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 8,544 girlsOHPennsylvania: #931 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 20,003 girlsPANew Jersey: #654 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 9,486 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,043 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 15,625 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWVVirginia: #619 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,968 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedKSArkansas: #334 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,176 girlsARTennessee: #579 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,966 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #466 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,192 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #227 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,203 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedLAMississippi: #269 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,419 girlsMSAlabama: #350 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,474 girlsALGeorgia: #650 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,312 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedHITexas: #643 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,793 girlsTXFlorida: #572 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,335 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Carolina#227 · 1 in 1,203
  2. Mississippi#269 · 1 in 1,419
  3. Arkansas#334 · 1 in 2,176
  4. Alabama#350 · 1 in 2,474
  5. North Carolina#466 · 1 in 4,192

Best ever in a state: #22 in Utah, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#227201 in 1,203
Mississippi#269161 in 1,419
Arkansas#33481 in 2,176
Alabama#350131 in 2,474
North Carolina#466111 in 4,192
Wisconsin#48261 in 6,601
Florida#57291 in 5,335
Tennessee#57951 in 6,966
Ohio#610111 in 8,544
Virginia#61951 in 7,968
Texas#643181 in 5,793
Georgia#65061 in 7,312
New Jersey#65461 in 9,486
Illinois#721101 in 9,817
Michigan#85551 in 15,628
Pennsylvania#93151 in 20,003
California#1,043111 in 15,625
New York#1,25761 in 26,782
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Mae
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 29 spots since 2024 (#529 → #500)
  • 72 spots since 2020 (#572 → #500)
  • 88 spots since 2015 (#588 → #500)
  • Biggest jump: 177 spots in 2011 (#979 → #802)
  • Biggest drop: 158 spots in 1968 (#826 → #984)
Rise & fade · girls
15 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1895 at #52 (1,193 births)
  • Births halved by 1954, 59 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 41 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1880–1920
  • Top 1,000: 106 yrs · run 1880–1969
Share of babies · girls
1 in 193
  • Highest: 1 in 193 girls born in 1892 were named Mae (0.52%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,706 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
  • Its best rank, #52 in 1895, was only 1 in 196 (0.51%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 19.8% of all girls named Mae (22,760) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5,647#57 (1889)#65
1890s10,918#52 (1895)#55
1900s12,711#53 (1902)#58
1910s21,530#65 (1910)#84
1920s22,760#99 (1920)#116
1930s12,859#137 (1930)#159
1940s8,947#185 (1940)#228
1950s5,542#287 (1950)#382
1960s2,172#517 (1961)#723
1970s830#1,026 (1970)#1,354
1980s606#1,502 (1980)#1,868
1990s654#1,667 (1999)#2,157
2000s1,714#1,063 (2009)#1,324
2010s4,427#548 (2019)#679
2020s3,518#500 (2025)#520

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Mae in 1964

girls
#724
205 births · 1 in 9,243 girls

Top girls' names in 1964

  1. #1Lisa54,270
  2. #2Mary40,985
  3. #3Susan31,515
  4. #4Karen30,243
  5. #5Patricia26,091
  6. #6Kimberly24,128
  7. #7Donna23,808
  8. #8Linda23,629
  9. #9Cynthia20,321
  10. #10Tammy20,043
  11. #724Mae205
More about 1964

girls

1,894,855 girls got a published name in 1964; 1 in 9,243 of them was named Mae, which outranked 90.7% of the 7,806 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Mae
  1. #721Shanna207
  2. #722Ilene206
  3. #722Tana206
  4. #724Mae205
  5. #724Nita205
  6. #724Roxane205
  7. #727Annamarie204
  8. #727Gerri204
  9. #727Jonna204

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1963
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,987Anjanette#5,891 → #904
  2. ↑ 2,403Deneen#2,619 → #216
  3. ↑ 2,162Denine#3,066 → #904
  4. ↑ 1,303Daneen#2,211 → #908
  5. ↑ 1,137Kecia#1,754 → #617
Fallers
  1. ↓ 341Leisha#993 → #1,334
  2. ↓ 320Cary#973 → #1,293
  3. ↓ 317Lisha#929 → #1,246
  4. ↓ 281Cecile#973 → #1,254
  5. ↓ 276Alexis#790 → #1,066

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1964 →