Mae

#500 for girls in 2025, 594 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1895 · 1,193 births
Debut · girls
344 births
In top 100 · girls
41 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
114,835
since 1880

Mae over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202005peak #52, 1895girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#500594—
2024#529578—
2023#506599#12,2395
2022#511614—
2021#501622—
2020#572511—
2019#548556—
2018#553561—
2017#637461—
2016#579535—
2015#588513—
2014#686413—
2013#676419—
2012#746373—
2011#802337—
2010#979259—
2009#1,063240—
2008#1,123230—
2007#1,205208—
2006#1,173207—
2005#1,277175—
2004#1,380151—
2003#1,612119—
2002#1,376140—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,402132—
1999#1,66799—
1998#1,84583—
1997#2,07068—
1996#2,34056—
1995#2,18961—
1994#2,07966—
1993#2,67645—
1992#2,43353—
1991#2,09264—
1990#2,17459—
1989#2,11958—
1988#2,09355—
1987#1,91859—
1986#2,02553—
1985#1,94856—
1984#1,72663—
1983#1,77060—
1982#1,73564—
1981#1,84859—
1980#1,50279—
1979#1,69465—
1978#1,54671—
1977#1,46875—
1976#1,49969—
1975#1,29186—
1974#1,25287—
1973#1,19490—
1972#1,16992—
1971#1,40575—
1970#1,026120—
1969#943127—
1968#984112—
1967#826147—
1966#730181—
1965#720189—
1964#724205—
1963#643247—
1962#627259—
1961#517358—
1960#519347—
1959#509368—
1958#495374#3,5596
1957#437459#3,2577
1956#424465—
1955#366575#2,7649
1954#371554—
1953#326640—
1952#319640#3,3736
1951#290730—
1950#287737#2,7708
1949#274792#3,2986
1948#252884—
1947#253859#2,6719
1946#249806#3,5255
1945#225854#1,85214
1944#224868#2,19511
1943#224876#2,5639
1942#204997#1,73017
1941#191993#2,6568
1940#1851,018#3,1306
1939#1801,060#1,79515
1938#1831,083#2,4799
1937#1851,071#1,82815
1936#1701,136#2,30110
1935#1601,267#1,83715
1934#1471,384#1,86015
1933#1481,290#1,90514
1932#1411,456#1,77717
1931#1411,462#2,32811
1930#1371,650#1,75318
1929#1321,767#2,00215
1928#1301,808#1,82218
1927#1252,072#2,03416
1926#1182,261#1,51524
1925#1162,332#1,93517
1924#1142,369#2,82210
1923#1092,428#2,44612
1922#1112,404#2,80110
1921#1102,589#2,80410
1920#992,730#2,23114
1919#992,634#2,06315
1918#952,756#2,26013
1917#962,507#2,9568
1916#922,607#2,54310
1915#892,486#2,07013
1914#852,049#2,9156
1913#791,814#1,36515
1912#741,775#1,61910
1911#701,449#1,5376
1910#651,453#1,1938
1909#681,230#75614
1908#571,384#1,0218
1907#571,375—
1906#601,225—
1905#601,284#78610
1904#581,214#1,2055
1903#581,192—
1902#531,261#7949
1901#541,140—
1900#541,406#83610
1899#591,035—
1898#561,239#1,0026
1897#541,144—
1896#551,148—
1895#521,193#1,0795
1894#541,134—
1893#531,071#9076
1892#521,101#8617
1891#54933—
1890#58920#8846
1889#57883—
1888#60836—
1887#58680—
1886#61641—
1885#63578#9365
1884#64542—
1883#70423—
1882#71406—
1881#75314—
1880#71344—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Mae was already there! It came in at #71, and was given to 344 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1981–1996, when fewer than 67 girls a year got the name.

Where Mae is popular in 2005

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #785 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,203 girlsMNIllinois: #744 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 4,477 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,085 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,893 girlsMINew York: #870 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 5,593 girlsNYMassachusetts: #624 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,070 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedINOhio: #939 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 7,160 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,132 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 9,143 girlsPANew Jersey: #876 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,799 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,380 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 11,521 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMOKentucky: #651 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,938 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedWVVirginia: #956 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,184 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedHITexas: #2,925 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 32,121 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Mae, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#624 · 1 in 4,070
  2. Kentucky#651 · 1 in 3,938
  3. Illinois#744 · 1 in 4,477
  4. Minnesota#785 · 1 in 5,203
  5. New York#870 · 1 in 5,593

Best ever in a state: #22 in Utah, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#62471 in 4,070
Kentucky#65151 in 3,938
Illinois#744151 in 4,477
Minnesota#78551 in 5,203
New York#870171 in 5,593
New Jersey#87671 in 5,799
Ohio#93981 in 7,160
Virginia#95661 in 6,184
Michigan#1,08561 in 7,893
Pennsylvania#1,13261 in 9,143
California#1,380201 in 11,521
Texas#2,92551 in 32,121
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Mae
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 29 spots since 2024 (#529 → #500)
  • 72 spots since 2020 (#572 → #500)
  • 88 spots since 2015 (#588 → #500)
  • Biggest jump: 177 spots in 2011 (#979 → #802)
  • Biggest drop: 158 spots in 1968 (#826 → #984)
Rise & fade · girls
15 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1895 at #52 (1,193 births)
  • Births halved by 1954, 59 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 41 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1880–1920
  • Top 1,000: 106 yrs · run 1880–1969
Share of babies · girls
1 in 193
  • Highest: 1 in 193 girls born in 1892 were named Mae (0.52%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,706 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
  • Its best rank, #52 in 1895, was only 1 in 196 (0.51%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 19.8% of all girls named Mae (22,760) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5,647#57 (1889)#65
1890s10,918#52 (1895)#55
1900s12,711#53 (1902)#58
1910s21,530#65 (1910)#84
1920s22,760#99 (1920)#116
1930s12,859#137 (1930)#159
1940s8,947#185 (1940)#228
1950s5,542#287 (1950)#382
1960s2,172#517 (1961)#723
1970s830#1,026 (1970)#1,354
1980s606#1,502 (1980)#1,868
1990s654#1,667 (1999)#2,157
2000s1,714#1,063 (2009)#1,324
2010s4,427#548 (2019)#679
2020s3,518#500 (2025)#520

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Mae in 2005

girls
#1,277
175 births · 1 in 10,559 girls

Top girls' names in 2005

  1. #1Emily23,952
  2. #2Emma20,362
  3. #3Madison19,578
  4. #4Abigail15,756
  5. #5Olivia15,700
  6. #6Isabella15,197
  7. #7Hannah14,854
  8. #8Samantha13,642
  9. #9Ava13,606
  10. #10Ashley13,276
  11. #1,277Mae175
More about 2005

girls

1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 10,559 of them was named Mae, which outranked 93.3% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Mae
  1. #1,273Adyson176
  2. #1,273Amia176
  3. #1,273Ryley176
  4. #1,277Mae175
  5. #1,277Jayna175
  6. #1,277Leigha175
  7. #1,277Nadine175
  8. #1,281Aiyanna174
  9. #1,281Izabelle174
  10. #1,281Juanita174

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2004
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,271Mikalah#7,077 → #806
  2. ↑ 2,724Yuridia#3,689 → #965
  3. ↑ 2,236Naima#3,127 → #891
  4. ↑ 1,924Karol#2,742 → #818
  5. ↑ 1,125Karma#1,972 → #847
Fallers
  1. ↓ 397Rhea#908 → #1,305
  2. ↓ 360Laisha#789 → #1,149
  3. ↓ 334Ashtyn#956 → #1,290
  4. ↓ 285Hunter#742 → #1,027
  5. ↓ 282Angeles#973 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2005 →