Makenzie
- #700 for girls in 2025, 406 births
- Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
- Given to girls 99.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 2,210 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 45,023since 1975
Makenzie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Makenzie has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #700 | 406 | — | |
| 2024 | #636 | 464 | — | |
| 2023 | #535 | 566 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #509 | 619 | — | |
| 2021 | #430 | 734 | — | |
| 2020 | #345 | 898 | — | |
| 2019 | #338 | 949 | — | |
| 2018 | #317 | 1,034 | — | |
| 2017 | #295 | 1,099 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #243 | 1,309 | — | |
| 2015 | #210 | 1,550 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #182 | 1,781 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #166 | 1,938 | — | |
| 2012 | #150 | 2,127 | — | |
| 2011 | #139 | 2,210 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #153 | 1,999 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #175 | 1,898 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #162 | 2,066 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #180 | 1,939 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #197 | 1,780 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #204 | 1,715 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #213 | 1,604 | #4,421 | 19 |
| 2003 | #209 | 1,578 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #198 | 1,624 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #196 | 1,660 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #199 | 1,613 | #5,920 | 11 |
| 1999 | #223 | 1,425 | #3,591 | 21 |
| 1998 | #270 | 1,158 | #4,019 | 17 |
| 1997 | #288 | 995 | #3,738 | 18 |
| 1996 | #306 | 931 | #3,549 | 19 |
| 1995 | #358 | 727 | #3,559 | 18 |
| 1994 | #400 | 630 | #5,109 | 11 |
| 1993 | #472 | 538 | #3,042 | 22 |
| 1992 | #604 | 376 | #4,114 | 14 |
| 1991 | #731 | 284 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #1,001 | 181 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #1,426 | 104 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,334 | 107 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #1,470 | 88 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #1,770 | 65 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #2,398 | 41 | #5,785 | 6 |
| 1984 | #2,266 | 43 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,109 | 18 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,770 | 33 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,625 | 22 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,777 | 20 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1975
The first year at least five girls were named Makenzie! It came in at #9,067, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1975, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Makenzie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- South Carolina#347 · 1 in 1,306
- Alabama#391 · 1 in 1,527
- Louisiana#394 · 1 in 1,488
- Pennsylvania#487 · 1 in 2,223
- Michigan#519 · 1 in 2,382
Best ever in a state: #28 in Mississippi, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #347 | 14 | 1 in 1,306 |
| Alabama | #391 | 12 | 1 in 1,527 |
| Louisiana | #394 | 11 | 1 in 1,488 |
| Pennsylvania | #487 | 21 | 1 in 2,223 |
| Michigan | #519 | 15 | 1 in 2,382 |
| Virginia | #520 | 15 | 1 in 2,249 |
| Georgia | #529 | 21 | 1 in 2,153 |
| Tennessee | #532 | 14 | 1 in 2,291 |
| Connecticut | #540 | 5 | 1 in 2,301 |
| Maryland | #549 | 9 | 1 in 2,221 |
| Wisconsin | #564 | 8 | 1 in 2,532 |
| Indiana | #577 | 11 | 1 in 2,537 |
| North Carolina | #581 | 18 | 1 in 2,582 |
| Utah | #605 | 6 | 1 in 2,846 |
| New Jersey | #618 | 12 | 1 in 2,958 |
| Ohio | #668 | 14 | 1 in 3,377 |
| Arizona | #676 | 9 | 1 in 3,135 |
| Oklahoma | #697 | 5 | 1 in 2,956 |
| Florida | #714 | 23 | 1 in 3,772 |
| Illinois | #748 | 12 | 1 in 3,694 |
| New York | #758 | 21 | 1 in 3,730 |
| Massachusetts | #761 | 6 | 1 in 4,005 |
| Texas | #820 | 36 | 1 in 4,460 |
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| California | #948 | 29 | 1 in 5,577 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Makenzie
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 355 spots since 2020 (#345 → #700)
- Biggest jump: 270 spots in 1991
- Biggest drop: 101 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1975
- Peaked 2011 at #139 (2,210 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 35 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 35 yrs · run 1991–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 796
- Highest: 1 in 796 girls born in 2011 were named Makenzie (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,959 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 38.8% of all girls named Makenzie (17,477) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 78 | #3,486 (1977) | #4,913 |
| 1980s | 540 | #1,334 (1988) | #2,516 |
| 1990s | 7,245 | #223 (1999) | #465 |
| 2000s | 17,477 | #162 (2008) | #193 |
| 2010s | 15,996 | #139 (2011) | #219 |
| 2020s | 3,687 | #345 (2020) | #526 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Makenzie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: