Maki
- Last seen for girls in 2024 at #12,161
- #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
- Given to boys 71.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2004 · 37 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 519since 1995
Maki over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #8,243 | 9 | |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #5,338 | 17 |
| 2020 | — | #8,739 | 8 | |
| 2019 | — | #7,643 | 10 | |
| 2018 | — | #7,136 | 11 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | #6,053 | 14 |
| 2015 | — | #6,676 | 12 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #4,866 | 19 |
| 2013 | — | #4,463 | 21 | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #3,807 | 27 |
| 2011 | — | #3,695 | 28 | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #3,128 | 36 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #3,476 | 31 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #3,344 | 33 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #4,011 | 25 |
| 2006 | — | #2,832 | 40 | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #2,803 | 38 |
| 2004 | — | #2,788 | 37 | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #4,616 | 17 |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #4,188 | 19 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #5,390 | 13 |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | — | |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | — | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | — | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | — | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1995
The first year at least five boys were named Maki! It came in at #8,868, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1998, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Maki is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Maki in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Maki
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 1,651 spots since 2024 (#9,894 → #8,243)
- 496 spots since 2020 (#8,739 → #8,243)
- 1,567 spots since 2015 (#6,676 → #8,243)
Rise & fade · boys
9 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2004 at #2,788 (37 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 51,382
- Highest: 1 in 51,382 boys born in 2006 were named Maki (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 189,786 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #2,788 in 2004, was only 1 in 53,648 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 49.9% of all boys named Maki (259) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2025
- Mostly girls until 2024, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21 | #5,656 (1999) | #8,052 |
| 2000s | 259 | #2,788 (2004) | #4,256 |
| 2010s | 187 | #3,128 (2010) | #5,561 |
| 2020s | 52 | #5,338 (2021) | #9,228 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Maki ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: