Malachi
- #10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births
- #134 for boys in 2025, 2,692 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 2,692 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 65,758since 1880
Malachi over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Malachi has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #134 | 2,692 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #149 | 2,424 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #146 | 2,482 |
| 2022 | — | #161 | 2,307 | |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #167 | 2,324 |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | #156 | 2,402 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #160 | 2,454 |
| 2018 | #10,545 | 9 | #154 | 2,514 |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | #153 | 2,549 |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | #154 | 2,634 |
| 2015 | #7,266 | 16 | #158 | 2,602 |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | #178 | 2,400 |
| 2013 | #10,235 | 10 | #174 | 2,337 |
| 2012 | #11,257 | 9 | #167 | 2,329 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #163 | 2,353 |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #161 | 2,416 |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | #166 | 2,352 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #160 | 2,459 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #155 | 2,710 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #150 | 2,776 |
| 2005 | #6,528 | 18 | #162 | 2,553 |
| 2004 | #7,391 | 15 | #179 | 2,246 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #194 | 1,919 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #210 | 1,673 |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | #252 | 1,325 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #351 | 767 |
| 1999 | — | #369 | 706 | |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #413 | 577 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #442 | 505 |
| 1996 | — | #504 | 414 | |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #531 | 359 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #630 | 271 |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #655 | 247 |
| 1992 | — | #783 | 178 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #856 | 149 |
| 1990 | — | #949 | 119 | |
| 1989 | — | #956 | 114 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,041 | 90 | |
| 1987 | — | #990 | 92 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,015 | 83 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,066 | 75 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,096 | 67 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,075 | 68 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,310 | 51 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,433 | 44 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,154 | 62 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,137 | 62 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,452 | 41 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,268 | 49 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,333 | 44 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,160 | 53 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,471 | 35 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,548 | 31 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,020 | 20 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,560 | 31 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,794 | 24 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,046 | 17 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,576 | 11 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,982 | 8 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,310 | 13 | |
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,035 | 16 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,997 | 17 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,535 | 11 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,530 | 11 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,026 | 16 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,093 | 15 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,765 | 20 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,219 | 13 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,114 | 14 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,391 | 11 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,856 | 17 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,774 | 18 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,657 | 20 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,702 | 19 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,519 | 23 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,076 | 14 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,409 | 25 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,009 | 12 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,195 | 11 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,764 | 17 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,496 | 22 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,759 | 16 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,368 | 24 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,425 | 22 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,559 | 19 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,828 | 15 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,062 | 12 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,494 | 21 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,658 | 18 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,456 | 22 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,101 | 13 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,207 | 12 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,753 | 18 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,589 | 10 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,270 | 13 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,959 | 17 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,605 | 22 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,628 | 22 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,776 | 20 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,020 | 16 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,470 | 26 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,904 | 18 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,694 | 21 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,531 | 23 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,165 | 14 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,755 | 18 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,152 | 13 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,600 | 19 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,772 | 13 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,112 | 21 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,537 | 6 | |
| 1910 | — | #928 | 12 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,155 | 7 | |
| 1908 | — | #877 | 10 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #1,233 | 5 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,064 | 6 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #862 | 8 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #1,310 | 5 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | #942 | 6 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | #963 | 5 | |
| 1890 | — | #739 | 8 | |
| 1889 | — | #878 | 6 | |
| 1888 | — | #815 | 7 | |
| 1887 | — | #752 | 7 | |
| 1886 | — | #694 | 8 | |
| 1885 | — | #765 | 7 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #691 | 8 | |
| 1881 | — | #866 | 5 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Malachi was already there! It came in at #600, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Malachi is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Georgia#70 · 1 in 339
- Alabama#73 · 1 in 331
- Mississippi#79 · 1 in 328
- North Carolina#93 · 1 in 396
- Michigan#93 · 1 in 402
Best ever in a state: #38 in Mississippi, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #70 | 148 | 1 in 339 |
| Alabama | #73 | 65 | 1 in 331 |
| Mississippi | #79 | 33 | 1 in 328 |
| Michigan | #93 | 100 | 1 in 402 |
| North Carolina | #93 | 130 | 1 in 396 |
| Louisiana | #96 | 51 | 1 in 375 |
| Oklahoma | #96 | 45 | 1 in 393 |
| Missouri | #98 | 66 | 1 in 421 |
| Oregon | #99 | 39 | 1 in 386 |
| Indiana | #100 | 77 | 1 in 411 |
| Tennessee | #100 | 88 | 1 in 418 |
| Florida | #107 | 210 | 1 in 455 |
| Virginia | #107 | 78 | 1 in 478 |
| Alaska | #110 | 7 | 1 in 325 |
| Maryland | #116 | 50 | 1 in 458 |
| Nevada | #123 | 25 | 1 in 452 |
| Ohio | #123 | 109 | 1 in 482 |
| Hawaii | #126 | 8 | 1 in 365 |
| Kentucky | #126 | 45 | 1 in 456 |
| Montana | #127 | 10 | 1 in 376 |
| South Dakota | #127 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| Texas | #130 | 303 | 1 in 578 |
| Washington | #136 | 59 | 1 in 556 |
| Illinois | #137 | 86 | 1 in 576 |
| Wisconsin | #146 | 43 | 1 in 545 |
| New Mexico | #148 | 13 | 1 in 500 |
| Arkansas | #151 | 24 | 1 in 524 |
| Pennsylvania | #151 | 86 | 1 in 608 |
| South Carolina | #151 | 38 | 1 in 558 |
| West Virginia | #151 | 12 | 1 in 513 |
| Kansas | #160 | 24 | 1 in 585 |
| Minnesota | #168 | 39 | 1 in 628 |
| California | #171 | 229 | 1 in 766 |
| Arizona | #175 | 50 | 1 in 654 |
| Colorado | #178 | 39 | 1 in 688 |
| Iowa | #180 | 23 | 1 in 601 |
| Connecticut | #187 | 18 | 1 in 734 |
| Idaho | #188 | 14 | 1 in 616 |
| Rhode Island | #200 | 5 | 1 in 625 |
| New Hampshire | #206 | 6 | 1 in 751 |
| Utah | #225 | 23 | 1 in 855 |
| Maine | #234 | 5 | 1 in 769 |
| New Jersey | #240 | 40 | 1 in 994 |
| Massachusetts | #259 | 23 | 1 in 1,175 |
| New York | #263 | 73 | 1 in 1,156 |
| Nebraska | #432 | 5 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Malachi
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 22 spots since 2020 (#156 → #134)
- Biggest jump: 468 spots in 1908
- Biggest drop: 609 spots in 1911
Rise & fade · boys
145 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #134 (2,692 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 53 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1989–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 635
- Highest: 1 in 635 boys born in 2025 were named Malachi (0.16%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 37.4% of all boys named Malachi (24,588) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 58 | #600 (1880) | #758 |
| 1890s | 30 | #739 (1890) | #933 |
| 1900s | 51 | #862 (1902) | #1,122 |
| 1910s | 156 | #928 (1910) | #1,569 |
| 1920s | 185 | #1,470 (1922) | #1,892 |
| 1930s | 172 | #1,425 (1939) | #1,754 |
| 1940s | 183 | #1,368 (1940) | #1,730 |
| 1950s | 155 | #1,657 (1950) | #2,043 |
| 1960s | 108 | #1,997 (1961) | #2,844 |
| 1970s | 390 | #1,137 (1979) | #1,474 |
| 1980s | 746 | #956 (1989) | #1,114 |
| 1990s | 3,525 | #369 (1999) | #613 |
| 2000s | 20,780 | #150 (2006) | #198 |
| 2010s | 24,588 | #153 (2017) | #162 |
| 2020s | 14,631 | #134 (2025) | #152 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Malachi ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: