Manuela

#2,564 for girls in 2025, 68 births · Last seen for boys in 1932 at #3,776
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1920 · 200 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
11,033
since 1880

Manuela over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Manuela has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202003peak #486, 1920girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,56468—
2024#2,08092—
2023#2,46672—
2022#2,22884—
2021#2,36676—
2020#2,00593—
2019#2,53869—
2018#2,17986—
2017#2,35777—
2016#2,61767—
2015#2,77363—
2014#2,29081—
2013#2,93657—
2012#2,80562—
2011#2,48373—
2010#2,80362—
2009#2,85261—
2008#2,48576—
2007#2,64769—
2006#2,35380—
2005#2,63664—
2004#2,20480—
2003#2,22977—
2002#2,04684—
2001#2,03583—
2000#2,30667—
1999#2,52756—
1998#2,16466—
1997#1,74987—
1996#2,12564—
1995#2,28258—
1994#2,14263—
1993#2,01269—
1992#1,60096—
1991#1,93372—
1990#2,43750—
1989#2,76940—
1988#2,41945—
1987#2,02455—
1986#2,02553—
1985#1,76064—
1984#1,51175—
1983#1,96152—
1982#1,76962—
1981#1,67468—
1980#1,47482—
1979#1,69465—
1978#1,56969—
1977#1,51472—
1976#1,35579—
1975#1,43972—
1974#1,48666—
1973#1,51062—
1972#1,67453—
1971#1,56062—
1970#1,68155—
1969#1,40268—
1968#1,29173—
1967#1,28171—
1966#1,82739—
1965#1,50055—
1964#1,47059—
1963#1,40363—
1962#1,25877—
1961#1,42062—
1960#1,30171—
1959#1,31566—
1958#1,19679—
1957#1,10989—
1956#1,22273—
1955#1,33457—
1954#1,15474—
1953#921105—
1952#1,08076—
1951#1,11669—
1950#773125—
1949#843110—
1948#689145—
1947#772124—
1946#755118—
1945#707111—
1944#732107—
1943#778100—
1942#79492—
1941#72894—
1940#74186—
1939#70194—
1938#71392—
1937#673102—
1936#649104—
1935#660100—
1934#660103—
1933#553132—
1932#599120#3,7765
1931#561136#3,0957
1930#544156#3,5926
1929#515173—
1928#500192#3,6976
1927#507191#4,2105
1926#506190#3,7086
1925#503197—
1924#488202—
1923#555169—
1922#515184—
1921#500197—
1920#486200—
1919#548158—
1918#583151—
1917#665104—
1916#612122—
1915#624111—
1914#60189—
1913#58776—
1912#57171—
1911#57356—
1910#52261—
1909#48858—
1908#61738—
1907#55443—
1906#52843—
1905#57037—
1904#60032—
1903#60729—
1902#68824—
1901#65923—
1900#52441—
1899#61625—
1898#71921—
1897#78616—
1896#75418—
1895#70320—
1894#81214—
1893#76715—
1892#76215—
1891#1,2136—
1890#75813—
1889#9508—
1888#1,1366—
1887#8608—
1886#8977—
1885#7459—
1884#68610—
1883#6928—
1882#6788—
1881#6797—
1880#8365—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Manuela was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.

Where Manuela is popular in 2003

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMINew York: #1,500 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 12,263 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,872 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 18,889 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Manuela, so not publishedHITexas: #2,214 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 22,582 girlsTXFlorida: #709 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,434 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Florida#709 · 1 in 4,434
  2. New York#1,500 · 1 in 12,263
  3. California#1,872 · 1 in 18,889
  4. Texas#2,214 · 1 in 22,582

Best ever in a state: #38 in Arizona, 1922.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Florida#709181 in 4,434
New York#1,50081 in 12,263
California#1,872121 in 18,889
Texas#2,21471 in 22,582
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Manuela
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 484 spots since 2024 (#2,080 → #2,564)
  • 559 spots since 2020 (#2,005 → #2,564)
  • 209 spots since 2015 (#2,773 → #2,564)
  • Biggest jump: 451 spots in 1892 (#1,213 → #762)
  • Biggest drop: 455 spots in 1891 (#758 → #1,213)
Rise & fade · girls
40 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1920 at #486 (200 births)
  • Births halved by 1935, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 70 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 70 yrs · run 1892–1950
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,987
  • Highest: 1 in 5,987 girls born in 1909 were named Manuela (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 23,636 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #486 in 1920, was only 1 in 5,991 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 17.2% of all girls named Manuela (1,895) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s76#678 (1882)#816
1890s163#616 (1899)#789
1900s368#488 (1909)#584
1910s999#522 (1910)#589
1920s1,895#486 (1920)#508
1930s1,139#544 (1930)#631
1940s1,087#689 (1948)#754
1950s813#773 (1950)#1,122
1960s638#1,258 (1962)#1,415
1970s655#1,355 (1976)#1,548
1980s596#1,474 (1980)#1,939
1990s681#1,600 (1992)#2,097
2000s741#2,035 (2001)#2,379
2010s697#2,179 (2018)#2,578
2020s485#2,005 (2020)#2,285

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Manuela in 2003

girls
#2,229
77 births · 1 in 23,729 girls

Top girls' names in 2003

  1. #1Emily25,693
  2. #2Emma22,719
  3. #3Madison20,201
  4. #4Hannah17,638
  5. #5Olivia16,154
  6. #6Abigail15,932
  7. #7Alexis14,867
  8. #8Ashley14,519
  9. #9Elizabeth14,123
  10. #10Samantha13,870
  11. #2,229Manuela77
More about 2003

girls

1,827,145 girls got a published name in 2003; 1 in 23,729 of them was named Manuela, which outranked 87.9% of the 18,439 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Manuela
  1. #2,203Tristyn78
  2. #2,203Vianca78
  3. #2,203Yara78
  4. #2,229Manuela77
  5. #2,229Abigael77
  6. #2,229Alyna77
  7. #2,229Anamaria77
  8. #2,243Camdyn76
  9. #2,243Clarisa76
  10. #2,243Emelie76

Tied with 13 names at #2,229; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2002
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,689Laci#2,126 → #437
  2. ↑ 1,528Karyme#2,467 → #939
  3. ↑ 1,500Roselyn#2,467 → #967
  4. ↑ 1,326Kaydence#2,310 → #984
  5. ↑ 1,170Sherlyn#2,081 → #911
Fallers
  1. ↓ 481Odalys#951 → #1,432
  2. ↓ 400Kari#975 → #1,375
  3. ↓ 334Litzy#501 → #835
  4. ↓ 289Alysha#960 → #1,249
  5. ↓ 252Roxana#861 → #1,113

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2003 →