Marcia

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 5,299 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
13 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,320
since 1880

Marcia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201920peak #74, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945—
2024#4,11435—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,82739—
2021#4,09035—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,66541—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,22034—
2016#3,46445—
2015#3,84239—
2014#3,36947—
2013#4,07636—
2012#3,58344—
2011#3,40747—
2010#3,07554—
2009#2,89260—
2008#3,26751—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,41977—
2005#2,48270—
2004#2,44669—
2003#2,61061—
2002#2,44765—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,84593—
1999#1,87484—
1998#1,73491—
1997#1,73389—
1996#1,551102—
1995#1,401117—
1994#1,346124—
1993#983188—
1992#1,116159—
1991#965195—
1990#900213—
1989#871212#7,9055
1988#759246—
1987#661284—
1986#666277—
1985#584334—
1984#543350—
1983#532357—
1982#465453—
1981#415530—
1980#414535—
1979#365620—
1978#325706—
1977#328715—
1976#304753#4,9356
1975#295795#5,4645
1974#264957#5,2275
1973#267935—
1972#265995#4,9865
1971#2431,204#3,9637
1970#2441,285#4,7245
1969#2601,112—
1968#2421,144—
1967#2241,308#3,5596
1966#2141,418#3,5376
1965#2121,549—
1964#1901,932#3,6016
1963#1802,157#2,8589
1962#1682,428—
1961#1552,685#2,70610
1960#1562,694#3,0778
1959#1413,091#3,6196
1958#1283,353#3,2757
1957#1263,538#3,5526
1956#1104,069#3,9425
1955#984,412#3,2017
1954#904,744#3,1767
1953#845,062#2,39111
1952#805,210#3,7345
1951#745,299#3,3646
1950#774,955#2,7708
1949#784,651#2,6069
1948#794,640#2,02714
1947#814,472#2,49810
1946#893,946#2,40310
1945#883,206—
1944#893,140—
1943#962,970#3,2316
1942#1052,669#1,94614
1941#1052,430#2,33310
1940#1122,273#2,6718
1939#1092,346#2,4499
1938#1162,169#2,6468
1937#1241,948#2,19711
1936#1381,595#3,5495
1935#1491,339#3,6455
1934#1571,267—
1933#1621,140#2,7388
1932#191951—
1931#215799—
1930#231692—
1929#263584—
1928#281540—
1927#287538—
1926#302487—
1925#315448#3,7416
1924#312460—
1923#292492—
1922#313428—
1921#307451—
1920#347361—
1919#357325—
1918#409256—
1917#445208—
1916#491171—
1915#462178—
1914#478132—
1913#472113—
1912#47999—
1911#49669—
1910#53957—
1909#50954—
1908#46261—
1907#58839—
1906#50946—
1905#57936—
1904#68226—
1903#52238—
1902#59131—
1901#72320—
1900#57636—
1899#64423—
1898#55533—
1897#59426—
1896#59427—
1895#53031—
1894#59724—
1893#41442—
1892#45336—
1891#48328—
1890#57820—
1889#48626—
1888#48626—
1887#52418—
1886#50819—
1885#43823—
1884#44920—
1883#38623—
1882#59610—
1881#47013—
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.

Where Marcia is popular in 1920

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #218 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,527 girlsMNIllinois: #287 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,818 girlsILWisconsin: #230 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,035 girlsWIMichigan: #252 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,221 girlsMINew York: #218 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 1,863 girlsNYMassachusetts: #226 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,132 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedRIOregon: #197 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,194 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNVWyoming: #94 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 319 girlsWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSDIowa: #231 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,712 girlsIAIndiana: #243 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,036 girlsINOhio: #267 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,766 girlsOHPennsylvania: #293 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,749 girlsPANew Jersey: #248 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,876 girlsNJConnecticut: #169 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,060 girlsCTCalifornia: #298 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,345 girlsCAUtah: #210 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,018 girlsUTColorado: #234 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,485 girlsCONebraska: #264 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,809 girlsNEMissouri: #447 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,110 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVAMaryland: #233 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,131 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNMKansas: #278 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,068 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #99 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 471 girlsDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #499 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,533 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedHITexas: #672 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,334 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wyoming#94 · 1 in 319
  2. District of Columbia#99 · 1 in 471
  3. Connecticut#169 · 1 in 1,060
  4. Oregon#197 · 1 in 1,194
  5. Utah#210 · 1 in 1,018

Best ever in a state: #31 in Iowa, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wyoming#9451 in 319
District of Columbia#9971 in 471
Connecticut#169131 in 1,060
Oregon#19751 in 1,194
Utah#21051 in 1,018
Minnesota#218151 in 1,527
New York#218531 in 1,863
Massachusetts#226171 in 2,132
Wisconsin#230121 in 2,035
Iowa#231131 in 1,712
Maryland#23371 in 2,131
Colorado#23461 in 1,485
Indiana#243131 in 2,036
New Jersey#248111 in 2,876
Michigan#252171 in 2,221
Nebraska#26471 in 1,809
Ohio#267201 in 2,766
Kansas#27881 in 2,068
Illinois#287211 in 2,818
Pennsylvania#293261 in 3,749
California#298121 in 2,345
Missouri#44761 in 5,110
Louisiana#49951 in 4,533
Texas#67291 in 6,334
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 725 spots since 2024 (#4,114 → #3,389)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,389)
  • 453 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #3,389)
  • Biggest jump: 210 spots in 1883 (#596 → #386)
  • Biggest drop: 363 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,346)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1951 at #74 (5,299 births)
  • Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 13 yrs · run 1943–1955
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1991
Share of babies · girls
1 in 340
  • Highest: 1 in 340 girls born in 1951 were named Marcia (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,717 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 32.8% of all girls named Marcia (43,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s187#386 (1883)#492
1890s290#414 (1893)#544
1900s387#462 (1908)#574
1910s1,608#357 (1919)#463
1920s4,789#263 (1929)#302
1930s14,246#109 (1939)#159
1940s34,397#78 (1949)#92
1950s43,733#74 (1951)#101
1960s18,427#155 (1961)#200
1970s8,965#243 (1971)#290
1980s3,578#414 (1980)#591
1990s1,362#900 (1990)#1,360
2000s700#1,845 (2000)#2,497
2010s419#3,075 (2010)#3,706
2020s232#3,389 (2025)#3,844

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcia in 1920

girls
#347
361 births · 1 in 3,319 girls

Top girls' names in 1920

  1. #1Mary70,983
  2. #2Dorothy36,643
  3. #3Helen35,097
  4. #4Margaret27,994
  5. #5Ruth26,102
  6. #6Mildred18,060
  7. #7Virginia17,314
  8. #8Elizabeth15,908
  9. #9Frances15,883
  10. #10Anna14,581
  11. #347Marcia361
More about 1920

girls

1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 3,319 of them was named Marcia, which outranked 94.0% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcia
  1. #344Florine363
  2. #345Callie362
  3. #345Hester362
  4. #347Marcia361
  5. #348Ophelia353
  6. #349Beth349
  7. #349Hope349
Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 550Denise#1,481 → #931
  2. ↑ 321Blossom#1,242 → #921
  3. ↑ 311Lilia#1,242 → #931
  4. ↑ 302Ena#1,270 → #968
  5. ↑ 277Lorayne#1,216 → #939
Fallers
  1. ↓ 594Haruko#917 → #1,511
  2. ↓ 511Roselle#1,000 → #1,511
  3. ↓ 345Toshiko#967 → #1,312
  4. ↓ 304Carroll#902 → #1,206
  5. ↓ 297Santina#835 → #1,132

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1920 →