Marcia

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 5,299 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
13 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,320
since 1880

Marcia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201985peak #74, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945—
2024#4,11435—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,82739—
2021#4,09035—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,66541—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,22034—
2016#3,46445—
2015#3,84239—
2014#3,36947—
2013#4,07636—
2012#3,58344—
2011#3,40747—
2010#3,07554—
2009#2,89260—
2008#3,26751—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,41977—
2005#2,48270—
2004#2,44669—
2003#2,61061—
2002#2,44765—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,84593—
1999#1,87484—
1998#1,73491—
1997#1,73389—
1996#1,551102—
1995#1,401117—
1994#1,346124—
1993#983188—
1992#1,116159—
1991#965195—
1990#900213—
1989#871212#7,9055
1988#759246—
1987#661284—
1986#666277—
1985#584334—
1984#543350—
1983#532357—
1982#465453—
1981#415530—
1980#414535—
1979#365620—
1978#325706—
1977#328715—
1976#304753#4,9356
1975#295795#5,4645
1974#264957#5,2275
1973#267935—
1972#265995#4,9865
1971#2431,204#3,9637
1970#2441,285#4,7245
1969#2601,112—
1968#2421,144—
1967#2241,308#3,5596
1966#2141,418#3,5376
1965#2121,549—
1964#1901,932#3,6016
1963#1802,157#2,8589
1962#1682,428—
1961#1552,685#2,70610
1960#1562,694#3,0778
1959#1413,091#3,6196
1958#1283,353#3,2757
1957#1263,538#3,5526
1956#1104,069#3,9425
1955#984,412#3,2017
1954#904,744#3,1767
1953#845,062#2,39111
1952#805,210#3,7345
1951#745,299#3,3646
1950#774,955#2,7708
1949#784,651#2,6069
1948#794,640#2,02714
1947#814,472#2,49810
1946#893,946#2,40310
1945#883,206—
1944#893,140—
1943#962,970#3,2316
1942#1052,669#1,94614
1941#1052,430#2,33310
1940#1122,273#2,6718
1939#1092,346#2,4499
1938#1162,169#2,6468
1937#1241,948#2,19711
1936#1381,595#3,5495
1935#1491,339#3,6455
1934#1571,267—
1933#1621,140#2,7388
1932#191951—
1931#215799—
1930#231692—
1929#263584—
1928#281540—
1927#287538—
1926#302487—
1925#315448#3,7416
1924#312460—
1923#292492—
1922#313428—
1921#307451—
1920#347361—
1919#357325—
1918#409256—
1917#445208—
1916#491171—
1915#462178—
1914#478132—
1913#472113—
1912#47999—
1911#49669—
1910#53957—
1909#50954—
1908#46261—
1907#58839—
1906#50946—
1905#57936—
1904#68226—
1903#52238—
1902#59131—
1901#72320—
1900#57636—
1899#64423—
1898#55533—
1897#59426—
1896#59427—
1895#53031—
1894#59724—
1893#41442—
1892#45336—
1891#48328—
1890#57820—
1889#48626—
1888#48626—
1887#52418—
1886#50819—
1885#43823—
1884#44920—
1883#38623—
1882#59610—
1881#47013—
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.

Where Marcia is popular in 1985

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMNIllinois: #560 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 4,562 girlsILWisconsin: #412 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,830 girlsWIMichigan: #454 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,817 girlsMINew York: #689 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,938 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIAIndiana: #386 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,095 girlsINOhio: #410 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 3,455 girlsOHPennsylvania: #384 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,143 girlsPANew Jersey: #653 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,774 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #665 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 5,186 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNEMissouri: #379 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,926 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWVVirginia: #396 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,996 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedARTennessee: #492 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,967 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #664 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,926 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #303 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,783 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #216 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 948 girlsDCOklahoma: #475 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,354 girlsOKLouisiana: #756 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,016 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedALGeorgia: #399 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,853 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedHITexas: #625 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 4,939 girlsTXFlorida: #507 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 3,839 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#216 · 1 in 948
  2. South Carolina#303 · 1 in 1,783
  3. Missouri#379 · 1 in 2,926
  4. Pennsylvania#384 · 1 in 3,143
  5. Indiana#386 · 1 in 3,095

Best ever in a state: #31 in Iowa, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#21661 in 948
South Carolina#303101 in 1,783
Missouri#379111 in 2,926
Pennsylvania#384221 in 3,143
Indiana#386111 in 3,095
Virginia#396111 in 2,996
Georgia#399131 in 2,853
Ohio#410201 in 3,455
Wisconsin#41281 in 3,830
Michigan#454151 in 3,817
Oklahoma#47561 in 3,354
Tennessee#49271 in 3,967
Florida#507171 in 3,839
Illinois#560161 in 4,562
Texas#625271 in 4,939
New Jersey#65371 in 5,774
North Carolina#66461 in 5,926
California#665391 in 5,186
New York#689181 in 5,938
Louisiana#75651 in 6,016
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 725 spots since 2024 (#4,114 → #3,389)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,389)
  • 453 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #3,389)
  • Biggest jump: 210 spots in 1883 (#596 → #386)
  • Biggest drop: 363 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,346)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1951 at #74 (5,299 births)
  • Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 13 yrs · run 1943–1955
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1991
Share of babies · girls
1 in 340
  • Highest: 1 in 340 girls born in 1951 were named Marcia (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,717 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 32.8% of all girls named Marcia (43,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s187#386 (1883)#492
1890s290#414 (1893)#544
1900s387#462 (1908)#574
1910s1,608#357 (1919)#463
1920s4,789#263 (1929)#302
1930s14,246#109 (1939)#159
1940s34,397#78 (1949)#92
1950s43,733#74 (1951)#101
1960s18,427#155 (1961)#200
1970s8,965#243 (1971)#290
1980s3,578#414 (1980)#591
1990s1,362#900 (1990)#1,360
2000s700#1,845 (2000)#2,497
2010s419#3,075 (2010)#3,706
2020s232#3,389 (2025)#3,844

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcia in 1985

girls
#584
334 births · 1 in 5,152 girls

Top girls' names in 1985

  1. #1Jessica48,345
  2. #2Ashley47,010
  3. #3Jennifer42,661
  4. #4Amanda39,055
  5. #5Sarah24,879
  6. #6Stephanie23,243
  7. #7Nicole22,966
  8. #8Heather21,151
  9. #9Elizabeth20,545
  10. #10Megan20,013
  11. #584Marcia334
More about 1985

girls

1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 5,152 of them was named Marcia, which outranked 95.3% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcia
  1. #580Kyla336
  2. #580Tiana336
  3. #583Janna335
  4. #584Marcia334
  5. #584Lashonda334
  6. #586Desirae333
  7. #586Luz333
  8. #588Billie331

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1984
Risers
  1. ↑ 7,360Kayleigh#8,153 → #793
  2. ↑ 1,675Madison#2,299 → #624
  3. ↑ 1,167Cierra#1,633 → #466
  4. ↑ 1,002Ciera#1,703 → #701
  5. ↑ 787Krystina#1,332 → #545
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,164Grisel#784 → #1,948
  2. ↓ 893Ciji#963 → #1,856
  3. ↓ 419Falon#914 → #1,333
  4. ↓ 364Alesia#969 → #1,333
  5. ↓ 362Echo#845 → #1,207

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1985 →