Marcus

Last seen for girls in 2022 at #15,306 · #258 for boys in 2025, 1,341 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1984 · 5,996 births
Debut · boys
47 births
In top 100 · boys
31 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
241,657
since 1880

Marcus over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201916peak #57, 1984boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#2581,341
2024—#2561,382
2023—#2501,400
2022#15,3065#2351,479
2021—#2281,616
2020—#2261,661
2019—#2181,722
2018—#2091,901
2017#15,9025#1942,037
2016#16,2155#1832,183
2015—#1682,481
2014—#1572,620
2013—#1592,536
2012#16,8695#1492,718
2011—#1452,814
2010#16,9925#1303,131
2009—#1233,409
2008#17,5045#1253,392
2007#17,6365#1173,670
2006—#1123,813
2005—#1163,477
2004#5,55522#1163,480
2003#12,4087#1193,395
2002#15,4325#1063,544
2001#10,1029#1043,696
2000#7,15814#993,797
1999#6,48415#983,867
1998#12,4266#964,015
1997#9,0179#934,183
1996#7,57411#874,546
1995#6,64113#814,647
1994#6,31914#755,258
1993#6,62213#745,063
1992#5,05119#824,545
1991#6,97612#765,069
1990#3,43631#725,304
1989#2,93137#675,395
1988#2,59741#665,207
1987#1,99156#674,950
1986#1,75166#635,278
1985#1,74065#615,586
1984#1,70364#575,996
1983#1,64467#585,637
1982#2,58136#634,988
1981#2,40940#674,510
1980#2,21845#714,260
1979#2,14746#764,048
1978#2,15943#703,995
1977#2,30739#723,846
1976#2,43933#743,681
1975#2,02343#683,969
1974#2,13338#733,801
1973#2,45530#723,714
1972#2,31132#713,685
1971#2,00142#654,410
1970#2,45030#714,315
1969#3,19918#1382,212
1968#3,05718#1741,538
1967#3,48414#1761,472
1966#3,74012#1941,266
1965#4,4949#1841,373
1964#4,35510#2071,351
1963#3,80112#2121,322
1962#6,5785#2081,372
1961#4,23910#2141,313
1960#5,6966#2101,326
1959#4,6258#2261,210
1958#4,8907#251982
1957#4,2029#2401,035
1956#5,9525#2251,063
1955—#228974
1954#5,1486#235897
1953#4,5957#257725
1952#5,5635#263676
1951—#284576
1950#4,3157#283556
1949—#315464
1948—#333406
1947—#344392
1946—#331382
1945—#355280
1944#4,5745#359277
1943—#365282
1942—#371268
1941—#358265
1940—#362250
1939#4,2505#377226
1938—#375224
1937—#358226
1936#4,1815#380207
1935—#361226
1934—#361226
1933—#349239
1932—#377222
1931—#374225
1930—#334277
1929—#360248
1928—#362256
1927#3,8757#350279
1926—#325310
1925—#325312
1924—#315333
1923#4,3766#326320
1922#4,0117#343297
1921#4,4646#305353
1920—#326321
1919—#333287
1918—#346273
1917#4,5945#322283
1916—#312278
1915—#282307
1914—#331192
1913—#302172
1912—#328132
1911—#34064
1910—#31163
1909—#33049
1908—#30751
1907—#31346
1906—#25361
1905—#27053
1904—#30042
1903—#28244
1902—#28544
1901—#25944
1900—#30148
1899—#24646
1898—#26844
1897—#29738
1896—#29639
1895—#30136
1894—#25646
1893—#24151
1892—#27044
1891—#31828
1890—#29933
1889—#27138
1888—#25647
1887—#34023
1886—#27239
1885—#24844
1884—#21857
1883—#26338
1882—#24846
1881—#22445
1880—#24147
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcus was already there! It came in at #241, and was given to 47 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1887, when fewer than 24 boys a year got the name.

Where Marcus is popular in 1916

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNHWashington: #160 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,067 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #250 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,089 boysMNIllinois: #384 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 6,212 boysILWisconsin: #241 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,229 boysWIMichigan: #357 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,596 boysMINew York: #339 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 5,734 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedSDIowa: #231 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,006 boysIAIndiana: #261 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,907 boysINOhio: #308 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,061 boysOHPennsylvania: #366 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 7,337 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #267 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,243 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNEMissouri: #265 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,237 boysMOKentucky: #185 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 1,232 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedWVVirginia: #246 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,050 boysVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedNMKansas: #254 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,197 boysKSArkansas: #262 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 1,712 boysARTennessee: #259 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,077 boysTNNorth Carolina: #263 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 2,095 boysNCSouth Carolina: #247 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 1,862 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #238 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 1,555 boysOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedLAMississippi: #247 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 1,621 boysMSAlabama: #267 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,117 boysALGeorgia: #190 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 1,375 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Marcus, so not publishedHITexas: #392 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 2,943 boysTXFlorida: #185 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,073 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Washington#160 · 1 in 1,067
  2. Florida#185 · 1 in 1,073
  3. Kentucky#185 · 1 in 1,232
  4. Georgia#190 · 1 in 1,375
  5. Iowa#231 · 1 in 2,006

Best ever in a state: #13 in Mississippi, 1983.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Washington#16071 in 1,067
Florida#18571 in 1,073
Kentucky#185161 in 1,232
Georgia#190191 in 1,375
Iowa#23191 in 2,006
Oklahoma#238101 in 1,555
Wisconsin#24191 in 2,229
Virginia#24691 in 2,050
Mississippi#247101 in 1,621
South Carolina#24791 in 1,862
Minnesota#25091 in 2,089
Kansas#25461 in 2,197
Tennessee#25991 in 2,077
Indiana#26171 in 2,907
Arkansas#26281 in 1,712
North Carolina#263121 in 2,095
Missouri#265111 in 2,237
Alabama#267101 in 2,117
California#26781 in 2,243
Ohio#308101 in 4,061
New York#339141 in 5,734
Michigan#35761 in 4,596
Pennsylvania#366101 in 7,337
Illinois#38481 in 6,212
Texas#392131 in 2,943
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcus
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 2 spots since 2024 (#256 → #258)
  • 32 spots since 2020 (#226 → #258)
  • 90 spots since 2015 (#168 → #258)
  • Biggest jump: 84 spots in 1888 (#340 → #256)
  • Biggest drop: 68 spots in 1887 (#272 → #340)
Rise & fade · boys
104 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1984 at #57 (5,996 births)
  • Births halved by 2011, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 31 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1970–2000
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 301
  • Highest: 1 in 301 boys born in 1984 were named Marcus (0.33%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,274 boys born in 2025 (0.08%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
  • 21.4% of all boys named Marcus (51,807) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s424#218 (1884)#258
1890s405#241 (1893)#279
1900s482#253 (1906)#290
1910s2,051#282 (1915)#321
1920s3,029#305 (1921)#334
1930s2,298#334 (1930)#365
1940s3,266#315 (1949)#349
1950s8,694#225 (1956)#249
1960s14,545#138 (1969)#192
1970s39,464#65 (1971)#71
1980s51,807#57 (1984)#64
1990s46,497#72 (1990)#83
2000s35,673#99 (2000)#114
2010s24,143#130 (2010)#171
2020s8,879#226 (2020)#242

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcus in 1916

boys
#312
278 births · 1 in 3,202 boys

Top boys' names in 1916

  1. #1John50,043
  2. #2William40,418
  3. #3James35,569
  4. #4Robert31,741
  5. #5Joseph23,883
  6. #6Charles23,612
  7. #7George23,381
  8. #8Edward17,005
  9. #9Frank15,291
  10. #10Thomas11,998
  11. #312Marcus278
More about 1916

boys

890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 3,202 of them was named Marcus, which outranked 93.1% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcus
  1. #309Doyle282
  2. #309Joel282
  3. #311Orval280
  4. #312Marcus278
  5. #313Carmen276
  6. #313Earle276
  7. #315Alonzo274
Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,568Tatsuo#3,392 → #824
  2. ↑ 1,088Hughes#1,878 → #790
  3. ↑ 410Angel#1,181 → #771
  4. ↑ 378Trinidad#1,181 → #803
  5. ↑ 354Rolla#1,306 → #952
Fallers
  1. ↓ 500Nicolas#804 → #1,304
  2. ↓ 468Collins#906 → #1,374
  3. ↓ 463Hilliard#952 → #1,415
  4. ↓ 383Arvo#952 → #1,335
  5. ↓ 363Rayford#941 → #1,304

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1916 →