Mardell
- Last seen for girls in 1981 at #10,411
- Last seen for boys in 2010 at #12,231
- Given to girls 95.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1932 · 67 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,170since 1896
Mardell over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Mardell has never cracked the top 800 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | #12,231 | 5 | |
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | #8,435 | 5 | |
| 1991 | — | #8,236 | 5 | |
| 1990 | — | #8,117 | 5 | |
| 1989 | — | #6,229 | 7 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #4,403 | 8 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | — | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,922 | 18 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,678 | 19 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,563 | 20 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,530 | 20 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,472 | 20 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,122 | 25 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,783 | 31 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,540 | 39 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,885 | 27 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,764 | 29 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,564 | 35 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,473 | 39 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,318 | 48 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,376 | 40 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | #1,418 | 32 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,698 | 24 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,087 | 54 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,206 | 43 | — | |
| 1941 | #993 | 54 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,062 | 46 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,022 | 48 | — | |
| 1938 | #972 | 53 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,002 | 49 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #1,003 | 47 | — | |
| 1935 | #896 | 59 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #888 | 59 | — | |
| 1933 | #904 | 56 | — | |
| 1932 | #846 | 67 | — | |
| 1931 | #912 | 58 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,144 | 42 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,015 | 51 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #954 | 61 | — | |
| 1927 | #963 | 62 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #921 | 66 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,020 | 54 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #976 | 61 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,037 | 53 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,059 | 51 | — | |
| 1921 | #919 | 65 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,206 | 40 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,216 | 38 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,299 | 34 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,219 | 35 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,689 | 21 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,231 | 32 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,740 | 15 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,274 | 20 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,981 | 9 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,792 | 8 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | — | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1896
The first year at least five girls were named Mardell! It came in at #1,416, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1897–1906, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Mardell is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Mardell in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Mardell
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1981
- Biggest jump: 287 spots in 1921
- Biggest drop: 213 spots in 1942
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1896
- Peaked 1932 at #846 (67 births)
- Births halved by 1944, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 12 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 12 yrs · run 1931–1935
Share of babies · girls
1 in 15,928
- Highest: 1 in 15,928 girls born in 1932 were named Mardell (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 333,612 girls born in 1981 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 26.0% of all girls named Mardell (564) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 6 | #1,416 (1896) | #1,416 |
| 1900s | 6 | #1,821 (1907) | #1,821 |
| 1910s | 212 | #1,216 (1919) | #1,493 |
| 1920s | 564 | #919 (1921) | #1,007 |
| 1930s | 538 | #846 (1932) | #959 |
| 1940s | 415 | #993 (1941) | #1,320 |
| 1950s | 253 | #1,540 (1952) | #2,171 |
| 1960s | 118 | #2,649 (1960) | #4,281 |
| 1970s | 48 | #4,246 (1970) | #7,804 |
| 1980s | 10 | #10,392 (1980) | #10,402 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mardell ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: