Margo

#559 for girls in 2025, 540 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,941
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 713 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
27,208
since 1905

Margo over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Margo has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201945peak #295, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#559540—
2024#544556—
2023#543556—
2022#617481—
2021#639464—
2020#765356—
2019#840321—
2018#975271—
2017#1,075236—
2016#1,039254—
2015#1,275191—
2014#1,464153—
2013#1,754117—
2012#2,04794—
2011#2,00098—
2010#2,31382—
2009#2,31684—
2008#2,07898—
2007#2,32882—
2006#2,35380—
2005#2,25480—
2004#2,11785—
2003#2,01989—
2002#1,89793—
2001#1,94189—
2000#1,659106—
1999#1,71994—
1998#1,543108—
1997#1,504108—
1996#1,498108—
1995#1,410116—
1994#1,331127—
1993#1,211143—
1992#1,274134—
1991#1,314126—
1990#1,130153—
1989#995173#6,9416
1988#952176—
1987#1,044148—
1986#1,088137—
1985#1,023147—
1984#979147—
1983#802194—
1982#750222—
1981#714233—
1980#917164—
1979#833187—
1978#842176—
1977#819183#5,1236
1976#798175—
1975#783180—
1974#686215—
1973#580274—
1972#563294—
1971#581301—
1970#606286—
1969#529346#4,4045
1968#525335—
1967#492375—
1966#486371—
1965#521336—
1964#478410—
1963#464436—
1962#445464—
1961#455461—
1960#479422—
1959#440476—
1958#438469—
1957#405519—
1956#399512—
1955#374555—
1954#315715#3,8275
1953#330635—
1952#311677—
1951#295713—
1950#313615—
1949#307631—
1948#352488—
1947#321595—
1946#339482—
1945#316455—
1944#328434—
1943#337441—
1942#311487#3,2126
1941#297474#3,1336
1940#380304—
1939#371314—
1938#366316—
1937#521160—
1936#615115—
1935#76977—
1934#1,06243—
1933#1,00847—
1932#1,05645—
1931#1,31431—
1930#93761—
1929#1,22337—
1928#1,42530—
1927#1,52329—
1926#1,51429—
1925#1,64726—
1924#1,56629—
1923#1,42832—
1922#1,50830—
1921#1,43732—
1920#1,47030—
1919#1,80121—
1918#1,80521—
1917#1,70821—
1916#2,02816—
1915#2,9009—
1914#1,81814—
1913#1,30819—
1912#1,9819—
1911#1,7928—
1910#1,26713—
1909#1,9576—
1908#1,4399—
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905#1,9315—
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1905

The first year at least five girls were named Margo! It came in at #1,931, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1907, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Margo is popular in 1945

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNHWashington: #190 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,274 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #193 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,568 girlsMNIllinois: #196 for girls · 42 births · 1 in 1,465 girlsILWisconsin: #184 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,657 girlsWIMichigan: #203 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,662 girlsMINew York: #239 for girls · 57 births · 1 in 1,900 girlsNYMassachusetts: #203 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,929 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedRIOregon: #221 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,635 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedSDIowa: #168 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,228 girlsIAIndiana: #234 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,111 girlsINOhio: #402 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,430 girlsOHPennsylvania: #347 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,342 girlsPANew Jersey: #288 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,032 girlsNJConnecticut: #205 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,763 girlsCTCalifornia: #217 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 1,347 girlsCAUtah: #174 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 889 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedCONebraska: #187 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,420 girlsNEMissouri: #370 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,271 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedVAMaryland: #257 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,946 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNMKansas: #296 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,735 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedARTennessee: #446 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,968 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #525 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,114 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #232 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,885 girlsDCOklahoma: #364 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,090 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedHITexas: #702 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 8,023 girlsTXFlorida: #323 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,495 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Iowa#168 · 1 in 1,228
  2. Utah#174 · 1 in 889
  3. Wisconsin#184 · 1 in 1,657
  4. Nebraska#187 · 1 in 1,420
  5. Washington#190 · 1 in 1,274

Best ever in a state: #70 in Wyoming, 1943.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Iowa#168161 in 1,228
Utah#17471 in 889
Wisconsin#184161 in 1,657
Nebraska#18771 in 1,420
Washington#190151 in 1,274
Minnesota#193151 in 1,568
Illinois#196421 in 1,465
Massachusetts#203181 in 1,929
Michigan#203301 in 1,662
Connecticut#20581 in 1,763
California#217621 in 1,347
Oregon#22161 in 1,635
District of Columbia#23251 in 1,885
Indiana#234141 in 2,111
New York#239571 in 1,900
Maryland#25791 in 1,946
New Jersey#288111 in 3,032
Kansas#29651 in 2,735
Florida#32391 in 2,495
Pennsylvania#347181 in 4,342
Oklahoma#36461 in 3,090
Missouri#37071 in 4,271
Ohio#402111 in 5,430
Tennessee#44651 in 5,968
North Carolina#52551 in 8,114
Texas#70291 in 8,023
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Margo
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 15 spots since 2024 (#544 → #559)
  • 206 spots since 2020 (#765 → #559)
  • 716 spots since 2015 (#1,275 → #559)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1935 (#1,062 → #769)
  • Biggest drop: 377 spots in 1931 (#937 → #1,314)
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1905
  • Peaked 1951 at #295 (713 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 61 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 61 yrs · run 1935–1984
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,526
  • Highest: 1 in 2,526 girls born in 1951 were named Margo (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,976 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 21.6% of all girls named Margo (5,886) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s26#1,439 (1908)#1,764
1910s151#1,267 (1910)#1,841
1920s304#1,223 (1929)#1,474
1930s1,209#366 (1938)#802
1940s4,791#297 (1941)#329
1950s5,886#295 (1951)#362
1960s3,956#445 (1962)#487
1970s2,271#563 (1972)#709
1980s1,741#714 (1981)#926
1990s1,217#1,130 (1990)#1,393
2000s886#1,659 (2000)#2,096
2010s1,817#840 (2019)#1,478
2020s2,953#543 (2023)#611

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Margo in 1945

girls
#316
455 births · 1 in 2,873 girls

Top girls' names in 1945

  1. #1Mary59,278
  2. #2Linda41,465
  3. #3Barbara38,273
  4. #4Patricia35,844
  5. #5Carol30,389
  6. #6Sandra24,700
  7. #7Nancy21,456
  8. #8Sharon20,838
  9. #9Judith20,192
  10. #10Susan19,222
  11. #316Margo455
More about 1945

girls

1,307,090 girls got a published name in 1945; 1 in 2,873 of them was named Margo, which outranked 94.0% of the 5,242 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Margo
  1. #313Sallie462
  2. #314Alicia460
  3. #315Helene458
  4. #316Margo455
  5. #316Sonja455
  6. #318Glenna453
  7. #319Mable451
  8. #319Nelda451

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1944
Risers
  1. ↑ 799Lauren#1,153 → #354
  2. ↑ 707Amber#1,661 → #954
  3. ↑ 648Laureen#1,315 → #667
  4. ↑ 630Deidre#1,609 → #979
  5. ↑ 623Candice#1,364 → #741
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Bernardine#937 → #1,332
  2. ↓ 386Joella#988 → #1,374
  3. ↓ 342Venita#937 → #1,279
  4. ↓ 275Magdalene#867 → #1,142
  5. ↓ 249Alpha#964 → #1,213

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1945 →