Margo

#559 for girls in 2025, 540 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,941
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 713 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
27,208
since 1905

Margo over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Margo has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201947peak #295, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#559540—
2024#544556—
2023#543556—
2022#617481—
2021#639464—
2020#765356—
2019#840321—
2018#975271—
2017#1,075236—
2016#1,039254—
2015#1,275191—
2014#1,464153—
2013#1,754117—
2012#2,04794—
2011#2,00098—
2010#2,31382—
2009#2,31684—
2008#2,07898—
2007#2,32882—
2006#2,35380—
2005#2,25480—
2004#2,11785—
2003#2,01989—
2002#1,89793—
2001#1,94189—
2000#1,659106—
1999#1,71994—
1998#1,543108—
1997#1,504108—
1996#1,498108—
1995#1,410116—
1994#1,331127—
1993#1,211143—
1992#1,274134—
1991#1,314126—
1990#1,130153—
1989#995173#6,9416
1988#952176—
1987#1,044148—
1986#1,088137—
1985#1,023147—
1984#979147—
1983#802194—
1982#750222—
1981#714233—
1980#917164—
1979#833187—
1978#842176—
1977#819183#5,1236
1976#798175—
1975#783180—
1974#686215—
1973#580274—
1972#563294—
1971#581301—
1970#606286—
1969#529346#4,4045
1968#525335—
1967#492375—
1966#486371—
1965#521336—
1964#478410—
1963#464436—
1962#445464—
1961#455461—
1960#479422—
1959#440476—
1958#438469—
1957#405519—
1956#399512—
1955#374555—
1954#315715#3,8275
1953#330635—
1952#311677—
1951#295713—
1950#313615—
1949#307631—
1948#352488—
1947#321595—
1946#339482—
1945#316455—
1944#328434—
1943#337441—
1942#311487#3,2126
1941#297474#3,1336
1940#380304—
1939#371314—
1938#366316—
1937#521160—
1936#615115—
1935#76977—
1934#1,06243—
1933#1,00847—
1932#1,05645—
1931#1,31431—
1930#93761—
1929#1,22337—
1928#1,42530—
1927#1,52329—
1926#1,51429—
1925#1,64726—
1924#1,56629—
1923#1,42832—
1922#1,50830—
1921#1,43732—
1920#1,47030—
1919#1,80121—
1918#1,80521—
1917#1,70821—
1916#2,02816—
1915#2,9009—
1914#1,81814—
1913#1,30819—
1912#1,9819—
1911#1,7928—
1910#1,26713—
1909#1,9576—
1908#1,4399—
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905#1,9315—
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1905

The first year at least five girls were named Margo! It came in at #1,931, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1907, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Margo is popular in 1947

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedAKMaine: #202 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,429 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNHWashington: #227 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,721 girlsWAIdaho: #188 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,006 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #135 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 770 girlsNDMinnesota: #169 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,320 girlsMNIllinois: #229 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 2,053 girlsILWisconsin: #205 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,958 girlsWIMichigan: #220 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 1,965 girlsMINew York: #270 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 2,549 girlsNYMassachusetts: #341 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,444 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedSDIowa: #236 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,184 girlsIAIndiana: #260 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,528 girlsINOhio: #237 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 2,253 girlsOHPennsylvania: #364 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 4,943 girlsPANew Jersey: #238 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 2,110 girlsNJConnecticut: #214 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,944 girlsCTCalifornia: #257 for girls · 63 births · 1 in 1,792 girlsCAUtah: #192 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,081 girlsUTColorado: #245 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,793 girlsCONebraska: #216 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,924 girlsNEMissouri: #291 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,932 girlsMOKentucky: #411 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,185 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedWVVirginia: #469 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,208 girlsVAMaryland: #384 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,834 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedNMKansas: #354 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,688 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedARTennessee: #446 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,734 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #395 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,366 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #210 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,464 girlsDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedMSAlabama: #452 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,615 girlsALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Margo, so not publishedHITexas: #510 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 4,827 girlsTXFlorida: #225 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,427 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#135 · 1 in 770
  2. Minnesota#169 · 1 in 1,320
  3. Idaho#188 · 1 in 1,006
  4. Utah#192 · 1 in 1,081
  5. Maine#202 · 1 in 1,429

Best ever in a state: #70 in Wyoming, 1943.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#13591 in 770
Minnesota#169251 in 1,320
Idaho#18861 in 1,006
Utah#19281 in 1,081
Maine#20271 in 1,429
Wisconsin#205191 in 1,958
District of Columbia#21081 in 1,464
Connecticut#214101 in 1,944
Nebraska#21671 in 1,924
Michigan#220371 in 1,965
Florida#225191 in 1,427
Washington#227151 in 1,721
Illinois#229431 in 2,053
Iowa#236131 in 2,184
Ohio#237401 in 2,253
New Jersey#238221 in 2,110
Colorado#24581 in 1,793
California#257631 in 1,792
Indiana#260171 in 2,528
New York#270591 in 2,549
Missouri#291141 in 2,932
Massachusetts#34191 in 5,444
Kansas#35451 in 3,688
Pennsylvania#364231 in 4,943
Maryland#38451 in 4,834
North Carolina#395121 in 4,366
Kentucky#41171 in 5,185
Tennessee#44671 in 5,734
Alabama#45271 in 5,615
Virginia#46961 in 6,208
Texas#510191 in 4,827
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Louisiana———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Margo
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 15 spots since 2024 (#544 → #559)
  • 206 spots since 2020 (#765 → #559)
  • 716 spots since 2015 (#1,275 → #559)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1935 (#1,062 → #769)
  • Biggest drop: 377 spots in 1931 (#937 → #1,314)
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1905
  • Peaked 1951 at #295 (713 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 61 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 61 yrs · run 1935–1984
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,526
  • Highest: 1 in 2,526 girls born in 1951 were named Margo (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,976 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 21.6% of all girls named Margo (5,886) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s26#1,439 (1908)#1,764
1910s151#1,267 (1910)#1,841
1920s304#1,223 (1929)#1,474
1930s1,209#366 (1938)#802
1940s4,791#297 (1941)#329
1950s5,886#295 (1951)#362
1960s3,956#445 (1962)#487
1970s2,271#563 (1972)#709
1980s1,741#714 (1981)#926
1990s1,217#1,130 (1990)#1,393
2000s886#1,659 (2000)#2,096
2010s1,817#840 (2019)#1,478
2020s2,953#543 (2023)#611

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Margo in 1947

girls
#321
595 births · 1 in 2,979 girls

Top girls' names in 1947

  1. #1Linda99,692
  2. #2Mary71,690
  3. #3Patricia51,278
  4. #4Barbara48,800
  5. #5Sandra34,779
  6. #6Carol33,543
  7. #7Nancy32,445
  8. #8Susan31,952
  9. #9Sharon28,533
  10. #10Donna23,517
  11. #321Margo595
More about 1947

girls

1,772,766 girls got a published name in 1947; 1 in 2,979 of them was named Margo, which outranked 94.7% of the 6,104 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 25.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Margo
  1. #318Debbie598
  2. #319Lucinda596
  3. #319Myrtle596
  4. #321Margo595
  5. #321Fannie595
  6. #323Katie586
  7. #324Claudette582
  8. #325Guadalupe581

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1946
Risers
  1. ↑ 417Michaele#1,276 → #859
  2. ↑ 385Carlotta#997 → #612
  3. ↑ 332Ricki#1,290 → #958
  4. ↑ 300Daria#1,220 → #920
  5. ↑ 290Ivy#1,087 → #797
Fallers
  1. ↓ 341Merlene#961 → #1,302
  2. ↓ 285Beatriz#985 → #1,270
  3. ↓ 276Ruthanne#874 → #1,150
  4. ↓ 253Estela#897 → #1,150
  5. ↓ 242Verla#885 → #1,127

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1947 →