Margot

#102 for girls in 2025, 2,575 births

Peak · girls
2025 · 2,575 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
25,568
since 1894

Margot over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Margot has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202005girlsat peak
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#1022,575
2024#1272,227
2023#1481,933
2022#1931,527
2021#1941,530
2020#2341,269
2019#3041,065
2018#358882
2017#363860
2016#433745
2015#592505
2014#741377
2013#941268
2012#1,060237
2011#1,280185
2010#1,456155
2009#1,463159
2008#1,583144
2007#1,672132
2006#1,833111
2005#1,98396
2004#1,781107
2003#1,534126
2002#1,606115
2001#1,88792
2000#1,88590
1999#1,71994
1998#1,551107
1997#1,73389
1996#1,519105
1995#1,62691
1994#1,72885
1993#1,538101
1992#1,507104
1991#1,537101
1990#1,68887
1989#1,58788
1988#1,47792
1987#1,349101
1986#1,293104
1985#1,226112
1984#1,238104
1983#1,32890
1982#1,187115
1981#1,45583
1980#1,37391
1979#1,67866
1978#1,59867
1977#1,77457
1976#1,58563
1975#1,71355
1974#1,88146
1973#2,01940
1972#1,50263
1971#1,41574
1970#1,27086
1969#1,12996
1968#1,11492
1967#1,08193
1966#991106
1965#973112
1964#896135
1963#861148
1962#852153
1961#929133
1960#877140
1959#971118
1958#1,08993
1957#1,026104
1956#1,007103
1955#922114
1954#940105
1953#787136
1952#807127
1951#765133
1950#90097
1949#843110
1948#747129
1947#90796
1946#802106
1945#631133
1944#732107
1943#654134
1942#653131
1941#607135
1940#629125
1939#619119
1938#586138
1937#599126
1936#578130
1935#612113
1934#582124
1933#633107
1932#71988
1931#83867
1930#69598
1929#84271
1928#1,02953
1927#1,13945
1926#1,19841
1925#1,22540
1924#1,25840
1923#1,30536
1922#1,05951
1921#1,23739
1920#98955
1919#1,21638
1918#1,18440
1917#1,12640
1916#1,27832
1915#1,31729
1914#98836
1913#1,30819
1912#1,08023
1911#1,11316
1910#1,33512
1909#1,36910
1908#1,08414
1907#1,3849
1906#1,5537
1905#1,6966
1904#1,6596
1903—
1902#1,5946
1901—
1900#1,17111
1899#1,3946
1898—
1897—
1896#1,5835
1895—
1894#1,4855
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1894

The first year at least five girls were named Margot! It came in at #1,485, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1894–1898, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Margot is popular in 2005

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,441 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,193 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMINew York: #1,283 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 9,508 girlsNYMassachusetts: #624 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,070 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedRIOregon: #625 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,179 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #1,115 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,119 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,540 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 28,803 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedUTColorado: #879 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,945 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedWVVirginia: #956 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,184 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedHITexas: #2,925 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 32,121 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Margot, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#624 · 1 in 4,070
  2. Oregon#625 · 1 in 3,179
  3. Colorado#879 · 1 in 4,945
  4. Virginia#956 · 1 in 6,184
  5. New Jersey#1,115 · 1 in 8,119

Best ever in a state: #29 in District of Columbia, 2020.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#62471 in 4,070
Oregon#62551 in 3,179
Colorado#87951 in 4,945
Virginia#95661 in 6,184
New Jersey#1,11551 in 8,119
New York#1,283101 in 9,508
Illinois#1,44161 in 11,193
California#2,54081 in 28,803
Texas#2,92551 in 32,121
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Margot
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 25 spots since 2024 (#127 → #102)
  • 132 spots since 2020 (#234 → #102)
  • 490 spots since 2015 (#592 → #102)
  • Biggest jump: 320 spots in 1914 (#1,308 → #988)
  • Biggest drop: 329 spots in 1915 (#988 → #1,317)
Rise & fade · girls
131 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1894
  • Peaked 2025 at #102 (2,575 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 50 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1929–1955
Share of babies · girls
1 in 624
  • Highest: 1 in 624 girls born in 2025 were named Margot (0.16%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
  • 43.3% of all girls named Margot (11,061) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s16#1,394 (1899)#1,487
1900s69#1,084 (1908)#1,439
1910s285#988 (1914)#1,195
1920s471#842 (1929)#1,128
1930s1,110#578 (1936)#646
1940s1,206#607 (1941)#721
1950s1,130#765 (1951)#921
1960s1,208#852 (1962)#970
1970s617#1,270 (1970)#1,644
1980s980#1,187 (1982)#1,351
1990s964#1,507 (1992)#1,615
2000s1,172#1,463 (2009)#1,723
2010s5,279#304 (2019)#753
2020s11,061#102 (2025)#166

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Margot in 2005

girls
#1,983
96 births · 1 in 19,248 girls

Top girls' names in 2005

  1. #1Emily23,952
  2. #2Emma20,362
  3. #3Madison19,578
  4. #4Abigail15,756
  5. #5Olivia15,700
  6. #6Isabella15,197
  7. #7Hannah14,854
  8. #8Samantha13,642
  9. #9Ava13,606
  10. #10Ashley13,276
  11. #1,983Margot96
More about 2005

girls

1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 19,248 of them was named Margot, which outranked 89.7% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Margot
  1. #1,969Quincy97
  2. #1,969Shelbi97
  3. #1,969Taleah97
  4. #1,983Margot96
  5. #1,983Alianna96
  6. #1,983Bianka96
  7. #1,983Ellianna96
  8. #1,993Brissa95
  9. #1,993Daniya95
  10. #1,993Ileana95

Tied with 9 names at #1,983; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2004
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,271Mikalah#7,077 → #806
  2. ↑ 2,724Yuridia#3,689 → #965
  3. ↑ 2,236Naima#3,127 → #891
  4. ↑ 1,924Karol#2,742 → #818
  5. ↑ 1,125Karma#1,972 → #847
Fallers
  1. ↓ 397Rhea#908 → #1,305
  2. ↓ 360Laisha#789 → #1,149
  3. ↓ 334Ashtyn#956 → #1,290
  4. ↓ 285Hunter#742 → #1,027
  5. ↓ 282Angeles#973 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2005 →