Margret

#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births

Peak · girls
1882 · 39 births
Debut · girls
24 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
10,068
since 1880

Margret over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Margret has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201916peak #285, 1882girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#5,72221
2024#6,93216
2023#11,1698
2022#10,3839
2021#9,56210
2020#7,96913
2019#8,59712
2018#8,14613
2017#8,77612
2016#7,60215
2015#8,44713
2014#6,71318
2013#11,0009
2012#7,14417
2011#6,85518
2010#7,21717
2009#7,06618
2008#7,40817
2007#4,29935
2006#12,4208
2005#5,26624
2004#5,37723
2003#4,03433
2002#4,49827
2001#3,14244
2000#3,66435
1999#4,31326
1998#3,01542
1997#3,16137
1996#3,83128
1995#3,49231
1994#3,09837
1993#3,05238
1992#2,51350
1991#4,20824
1990#2,95738
1989#2,65842
1988#2,64640
1987#2,43442
1986#3,45925
1985#2,86032
1984#2,08148
1983#2,47537
1982#2,83032
1981#2,44739
1980#2,48638
1979#2,47737
1978#2,47435
1977#1,90152
1976#1,91247
1975#1,68956
1974#1,76051
1973#1,58958
1972#1,62755
1971#1,77250
1970#1,54463
1969#1,46564
1968#1,30172
1967#1,19679
1966#1,12988
1965#1,29270
1964#1,078102
1963#1,13992
1962#1,14591
1961#1,15591
1960#1,19283
1959#1,26272
1958#1,07595
1957#1,12487
1956#1,02799
1955#999100
1954#905113
1953#832124
1952#800128
1951#876105
1950#755131
1949#708143
1948#842108
1947#780122
1946#805105
1945#81985
1944#77497
1943#745108
1942#739104
1941#77387
1940#686102
1939#655107
1938#653110
1937#606123
1936#73981
1935#591121
1934#625113
1933#582122
1932#545143
1931#561136
1930#495181
1929#551153
1928#545163
1927#494199
1926#501194
1925#547172
1924#507196
1923#533177
1922#491198
1921#472214
1920#515184
1919#510177
1918#479199
1917#512168
1916#513162
1915#624111
1914#511119
1913#55984
1912#50390
1911#54859
1910#49567
1909#58044
1908#47956
1907#50051
1906#50647
1905#47651
1904#54537
1903#52737
1902#57133
1901#53832
1900#48149
1899#51433
1898#54434
1897#53730
1896#46239
1895#48836
1894#52730
1893#48731
1892#47133
1891#39539
1890#43534
1889#46828
1888#34946
1887#47122
1886#43225
1885#32439
1884#34932
1883#32430
1882#28539
1881#34622
1880#32624
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Margret was already there! It came in at #326, and was given to 24 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2006, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.

Where Margret is popular in 1916

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMNIllinois: #613 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,585 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMINew York: #557 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 13,425 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedSDIowa: #354 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,449 girlsIAIndiana: #323 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,387 girlsINOhio: #541 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,595 girlsOHPennsylvania: #572 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,877 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNEMissouri: #499 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,769 girlsMOKentucky: #417 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,008 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedWVVirginia: #403 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,854 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedKSArkansas: #377 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,732 girlsARTennessee: #299 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,311 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #334 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,053 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #355 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,620 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedLAMississippi: #320 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,251 girlsMSAlabama: #415 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,694 girlsALGeorgia: #511 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,269 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedHITexas: #553 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,504 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Margret, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Tennessee#299 · 1 in 2,311
  2. Mississippi#320 · 1 in 2,251
  3. Indiana#323 · 1 in 3,387
  4. North Carolina#334 · 1 in 3,053
  5. Iowa#354 · 1 in 3,449

Best ever in a state: #210 in Tennessee, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Tennessee#299101 in 2,311
Mississippi#32081 in 2,251
Indiana#32371 in 3,387
North Carolina#334101 in 3,053
Iowa#35461 in 3,449
Oklahoma#35571 in 2,620
Arkansas#37761 in 2,732
Virginia#40351 in 4,854
Alabama#41571 in 3,694
Kentucky#41761 in 4,008
Missouri#49951 in 5,769
Georgia#51151 in 6,269
Ohio#54151 in 9,595
Texas#553101 in 4,504
New York#55771 in 13,425
Pennsylvania#57261 in 14,877
Illinois#61351 in 11,585
Alaska———
Arizona———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Margret
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 1,210 spots since 2024 (#6,932 → #5,722)
  • 2,247 spots since 2020 (#7,969 → #5,722)
  • 2,725 spots since 2015 (#8,447 → #5,722)
  • Biggest jump: 134 spots in 1949 (#842 → #708)
  • Biggest drop: 148 spots in 1936 (#591 → #739)
Rise & fade · girls
2 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1882 at #285 (39 births)
  • Births halved by 2006, 124 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 76 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 76 yrs · run 1880–1955
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,765
  • Highest: 1 in 2,765 girls born in 1882 were named Margret (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 18.4% of all girls named Margret (1,850) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s307#285 (1882)#367
1890s339#395 (1891)#486
1900s437#476 (1905)#520
1910s1,236#479 (1918)#525
1920s1,850#472 (1921)#516
1930s1,237#495 (1930)#605
1940s1,061#686 (1940)#767
1950s1,054#755 (1950)#966
1960s832#1,078 (1964)#1,209
1970s504#1,544 (1970)#1,875
1980s375#2,081 (1984)#2,638
1990s351#2,513 (1992)#3,364
2000s264#3,142 (2001)#5,717
2010s144#6,713 (2014)#8,050
2020s77#5,722 (2025)#8,623

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Margret in 1916

girls
#513
162 births · 1 in 6,447 girls

Top girls' names in 1916

  1. #1Mary61,438
  2. #2Helen32,661
  3. #3Dorothy27,418
  4. #4Margaret24,953
  5. #5Ruth23,189
  6. #6Mildred15,633
  7. #7Anna15,228
  8. #8Elizabeth14,940
  9. #9Frances13,746
  10. #10Virginia12,487
  11. #513Margret162
More about 1916

girls

1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 6,447 of them was named Margret, which outranked 90.1% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Margret
  1. #509Rowena165
  2. #511Deloris164
  3. #511Mazie164
  4. #513Margret162
  5. #513Aurelia162
  6. #515Elna161
  7. #515Winnifred161
  8. #517Rachael160

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
  1. ↑ 567Trinidad#1,317 → #750
  2. ↑ 388Coral#1,367 → #979
  3. ↑ 377Coletta#1,317 → #940
  4. ↑ 370Clifford#1,285 → #915
  5. ↑ 327Maida#1,231 → #904
Fallers
  1. ↓ 364Louis#934 → #1,298
  2. ↓ 354Herminia#944 → #1,298
  3. ↓ 346Gertha#900 → #1,246
  4. ↓ 344Lahoma#934 → #1,278
  5. ↓ 310Hassie#900 → #1,210

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1916 →