Mariah
#447 for girls in 2025, 693 births · Last seen for boys in 2014 at #8,781
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 5,086 births
- Debut · girls
- 22 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 18 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 115,096since 1880
Mariah over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #447 | 693 | — | |
| 2024 | #413 | 760 | — | |
| 2023 | #393 | 783 | — | |
| 2022 | #345 | 933 | — | |
| 2021 | #340 | 958 | — | |
| 2020 | #302 | 1,071 | — | |
| 2019 | #276 | 1,197 | — | |
| 2018 | #216 | 1,440 | — | |
| 2017 | #195 | 1,617 | — | |
| 2016 | #166 | 1,930 | — | |
| 2015 | #152 | 2,118 | — | |
| 2014 | #137 | 2,409 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #113 | 2,773 | — | |
| 2012 | #107 | 2,908 | — | |
| 2011 | #98 | 2,995 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #97 | 3,113 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #88 | 3,605 | — | |
| 2008 | #77 | 4,041 | #7,698 | 10 |
| 2007 | #92 | 3,707 | — | |
| 2006 | #82 | 4,075 | — | |
| 2005 | #85 | 3,840 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #113 | 2,982 | #6,520 | 11 |
| 2003 | #113 | 3,073 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #130 | 2,672 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #85 | 3,585 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #75 | 4,104 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #68 | 4,646 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #62 | 5,086 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #67 | 4,803 | — | |
| 1996 | #63 | 5,446 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #71 | 4,773 | #4,280 | 14 |
| 1994 | #75 | 4,749 | #4,537 | 13 |
| 1993 | #81 | 4,093 | #6,228 | 8 |
| 1992 | #74 | 4,712 | #3,920 | 15 |
| 1991 | #69 | 5,192 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #259 | 1,103 | — | |
| 1989 | #561 | 399 | — | |
| 1988 | #521 | 423 | — | |
| 1987 | #496 | 437 | — | |
| 1986 | #677 | 272 | — | |
| 1985 | #572 | 341 | — | |
| 1984 | #585 | 311 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | #549 | 335 | — | |
| 1982 | #538 | 361 | — | |
| 1981 | #573 | 322 | — | |
| 1980 | #513 | 387 | #5,525 | 6 |
| 1979 | #591 | 305 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #589 | 289 | — | |
| 1977 | #578 | 299 | #5,845 | 5 |
| 1976 | #760 | 190 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #859 | 156 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,013 | 118 | — | |
| 1973 | #911 | 135 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,526 | 61 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,586 | 60 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,952 | 43 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,400 | 14 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,833 | 19 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,915 | 19 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,436 | 13 | — | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,779 | 16 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,269 | 12 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,581 | 17 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,810 | 14 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,535 | 16 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,416 | 17 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,949 | 20 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,817 | 11 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,424 | 12 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,873 | 18 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,845 | 18 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,153 | 14 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,663 | 21 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,344 | 29 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,688 | 10 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,597 | 23 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,024 | 16 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,703 | 22 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,825 | 20 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,637 | 25 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,828 | 22 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,667 | 25 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,795 | 23 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,566 | 29 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,536 | 29 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,437 | 32 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,246 | 38 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,177 | 40 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,126 | 43 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,337 | 30 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,246 | 33 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,523 | 23 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,080 | 31 | — | |
| 1913 | #925 | 33 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,032 | 25 | — | |
| 1911 | #853 | 25 | — | |
| 1910 | #859 | 25 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,052 | 15 | — | |
| 1908 | #882 | 20 | — | |
| 1907 | #923 | 17 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #713 | 25 | — | |
| 1904 | #710 | 24 | — | |
| 1903 | #712 | 22 | — | |
| 1902 | #716 | 23 | — | |
| 1901 | #881 | 14 | — | |
| 1900 | #656 | 29 | — | |
| 1899 | #791 | 17 | — | |
| 1898 | #631 | 26 | — | |
| 1897 | #594 | 26 | — | |
| 1896 | #651 | 23 | — | |
| 1895 | #547 | 29 | — | |
| 1894 | #504 | 32 | — | |
| 1893 | #520 | 28 | — | |
| 1892 | #579 | 23 | — | |
| 1891 | #572 | 21 | — | |
| 1890 | #468 | 31 | — | |
| 1889 | #439 | 30 | — | |
| 1888 | #572 | 19 | — | |
| 1887 | #398 | 30 | — | |
| 1886 | #439 | 24 | — | |
| 1885 | #405 | 26 | — | |
| 1884 | #438 | 21 | — | |
| 1883 | #499 | 15 | — | |
| 1882 | #377 | 22 | — | |
| 1881 | #470 | 13 | — | |
| 1880 | #342 | 22 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mariah was already there! It came in at #342, and was given to 22 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Mariah is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#11 · 1 in 107
- Mississippi#50 · 1 in 252
- South Dakota#53 · 1 in 201
- Colorado#59 · 1 in 302
- Michigan#60 · 1 in 296
Best ever in a state: #3 in New Mexico, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #11 | 78 | 1 in 107 |
| Mississippi | #50 | 46 | 1 in 252 |
| South Dakota | #53 | 16 | 1 in 201 |
| Colorado | #59 | 82 | 1 in 302 |
| Michigan | #60 | 160 | 1 in 296 |
| Rhode Island | #62 | 17 | 1 in 221 |
| California | #63 | 643 | 1 in 358 |
| Delaware | #63 | 14 | 1 in 222 |
| Indiana | #64 | 109 | 1 in 298 |
| Missouri | #65 | 100 | 1 in 290 |
| Texas | #67 | 423 | 1 in 380 |
| Oklahoma | #68 | 55 | 1 in 303 |
| Wisconsin | #68 | 77 | 1 in 325 |
| Louisiana | #69 | 61 | 1 in 323 |
| Nevada | #71 | 37 | 1 in 313 |
| Arizona | #73 | 102 | 1 in 348 |
| Kansas | #73 | 43 | 1 in 320 |
| Nebraska | #73 | 27 | 1 in 307 |
| Idaho | #74 | 22 | 1 in 312 |
| Ohio | #75 | 154 | 1 in 372 |
| Alaska | #81 | 9 | 1 in 255 |
| Wyoming | #81 | 6 | 1 in 220 |
| Vermont | #85 | 6 | 1 in 264 |
| Iowa | #86 | 37 | 1 in 370 |
| Illinois | #87 | 170 | 1 in 395 |
| Florida | #91 | 194 | 1 in 442 |
| Minnesota | #91 | 62 | 1 in 420 |
| Alabama | #92 | 49 | 1 in 403 |
| Washington | #92 | 69 | 1 in 425 |
| Pennsylvania | #94 | 118 | 1 in 465 |
| Georgia | #95 | 106 | 1 in 485 |
| Maine | #95 | 13 | 1 in 338 |
| Montana | #96 | 9 | 1 in 314 |
| North Dakota | #99 | 8 | 1 in 302 |
| Oregon | #102 | 36 | 1 in 442 |
| North Carolina | #103 | 90 | 1 in 504 |
| Maryland | #106 | 53 | 1 in 467 |
| Arkansas | #115 | 25 | 1 in 492 |
| Connecticut | #116 | 31 | 1 in 459 |
| Tennessee | #121 | 55 | 1 in 565 |
| Virginia | #121 | 66 | 1 in 562 |
| Utah | #125 | 35 | 1 in 526 |
| Kentucky | #130 | 35 | 1 in 563 |
| New York | #132 | 146 | 1 in 651 |
| South Carolina | #145 | 26 | 1 in 671 |
| New Hampshire | #150 | 8 | 1 in 553 |
| West Virginia | #151 | 12 | 1 in 572 |
| Hawaii | #160 | 7 | 1 in 473 |
| New Jersey | #167 | 51 | 1 in 796 |
| District of Columbia | #173 | 6 | 1 in 522 |
| Massachusetts | #175 | 36 | 1 in 791 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mariah
- 34 spots since 2024 (#413 → #447)
- 145 spots since 2020 (#302 → #447)
- 295 spots since 2015 (#152 → #447)
- Biggest jump: 615 spots in 1973 (#1,526 → #911)
- Biggest drop: 225 spots in 1901 (#656 → #881)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1998 at #62 (5,086 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 18 yrs · run 1991–2001
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1975–2025
- Highest: 1 in 322 girls born in 1996 were named Mariah (0.31%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,319 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #62 in 1998, was only 1 in 347 (0.29%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 38.8% of all girls named Mariah (44,603) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 222 | #342 (1880) | #438 |
| 1890s | 256 | #468 (1890) | #586 |
| 1900s | 213 | #656 (1900) | #799 |
| 1910s | 308 | #853 (1911) | #1,116 |
| 1920s | 275 | #1,246 (1920) | #1,597 |
| 1930s | 187 | #1,344 (1934) | #1,893 |
| 1940s | 137 | #1,949 (1943) | #2,635 |
| 1950s | 115 | #2,535 (1950) | #3,775 |
| 1960s | 154 | #2,296 (1968) | #3,777 |
| 1970s | 1,656 | #578 (1977) | #1,037 |
| 1980s | 3,588 | #496 (1987) | #559 |
| 1990s | 44,603 | #62 (1998) | #89 |
| 2000s | 35,684 | #75 (2000) | #94 |
| 2010s | 22,500 | #97 (2010) | #156 |
| 2020s | 5,198 | #302 (2020) | #373 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mariah in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 481 of them was named Mariah, which outranked 99.6% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 285,329 of them was named Mariah, which outranked 31.8% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #8,299Zorion8
- #8,299Zuhayr8
- #8,299Zymier8
- #9,115Mariah7
- #9,115Aasim7
- #9,115Abdimalik7
- #9,115Abdinasir7
- #10,151Aadam6
- #10,151Aadhav6
- #10,151Abanoub6
Tied with 1,035 names at #9,115; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.