Maribel
#1,652 for girls in 2025, 125 births · Last seen for boys in 1995 at #7,792
Given to girls 99.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1980 · 769 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 24,870since 1906
Maribel over time
Rank among girls' names. Maribel has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,652 | 125 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,708 | 119 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,514 | 142 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,373 | 168 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,024 | 95 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,623 | 128 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,035 | 94 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,813 | 112 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,655 | 130 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,472 | 156 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,411 | 164 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,454 | 155 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,338 | 174 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,291 | 184 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,138 | 215 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,180 | 206 | — | |
| 2009 | #945 | 282 | — | |
| 2008 | #935 | 291 | — | |
| 2007 | #905 | 304 | — | |
| 2006 | #804 | 341 | — | |
| 2005 | #598 | 474 | — | |
| 2004 | #764 | 341 | — | |
| 2003 | #839 | 291 | — | |
| 2002 | #729 | 334 | — | |
| 2001 | #726 | 335 | — | |
| 2000 | #649 | 385 | — | |
| 1999 | #622 | 382 | — | |
| 1998 | #577 | 424 | — | |
| 1997 | #491 | 502 | — | |
| 1996 | #502 | 477 | — | |
| 1995 | #484 | 513 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #495 | 501 | — | |
| 1993 | #478 | 526 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #415 | 610 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #424 | 601 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | #394 | 661 | #4,993 | 10 |
| 1989 | #431 | 572 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #470 | 481 | — | |
| 1987 | #450 | 491 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #445 | 485 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #462 | 460 | #3,805 | 11 |
| 1984 | #439 | 474 | #2,824 | 16 |
| 1983 | #424 | 510 | #3,230 | 13 |
| 1982 | #360 | 640 | #3,692 | 11 |
| 1981 | #354 | 662 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #315 | 769 | #4,134 | 9 |
| 1979 | #402 | 538 | — | |
| 1978 | #399 | 515 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #405 | 512 | #5,845 | 5 |
| 1976 | #389 | 528 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #380 | 546 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #380 | 558 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #390 | 523 | #4,054 | 7 |
| 1972 | #385 | 555 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #390 | 576 | — | |
| 1970 | #446 | 492 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #468 | 425 | — | |
| 1968 | #521 | 342 | — | |
| 1967 | #561 | 282 | — | |
| 1966 | #680 | 205 | — | |
| 1965 | #646 | 230 | — | |
| 1964 | #632 | 260 | — | |
| 1963 | #656 | 238 | — | |
| 1962 | #670 | 232 | — | |
| 1961 | #929 | 133 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,147 | 90 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,273 | 71 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,791 | 37 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,028 | 29 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,005 | 29 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,156 | 25 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,706 | 9 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | — | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #2,386 | 12 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,047 | 9 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,587 | 12 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,194 | 16 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,283 | 16 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,212 | 17 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,672 | 25 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,282 | 16 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,209 | 16 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,652 | 22 | — | |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,526 | 11 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | — | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Maribel! It came in at #1,951, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1906–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Maribel is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#272 · 1 in 1,020
- California#400 · 1 in 2,099
- Texas#438 · 1 in 2,342
- Oklahoma#453 · 1 in 2,107
- Oregon#550 · 1 in 2,650
Best ever in a state: #96 in California, 1980.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #272 | 8 | 1 in 1,020 |
| California | #400 | 109 | 1 in 2,099 |
| Texas | #438 | 68 | 1 in 2,342 |
| Oklahoma | #453 | 8 | 1 in 2,107 |
| Oregon | #550 | 6 | 1 in 2,650 |
| Arizona | #671 | 10 | 1 in 3,442 |
| Florida | #700 | 19 | 1 in 4,316 |
| Illinois | #714 | 16 | 1 in 4,281 |
| Wisconsin | #734 | 5 | 1 in 4,976 |
| Colorado | #743 | 6 | 1 in 4,116 |
| Georgia | #789 | 11 | 1 in 4,593 |
| New Jersey | #874 | 7 | 1 in 5,944 |
| Washington | #910 | 5 | 1 in 5,756 |
| New York | #1,284 | 10 | 1 in 9,701 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maribel
- 56 spots since 2024 (#1,708 → #1,652)
- 29 spots since 2020 (#1,623 → #1,652)
- 241 spots since 2015 (#1,411 → #1,652)
- Biggest jump: 259 spots in 1962 (#929 → #670)
- Biggest drop: 235 spots in 2010 (#945 → #1,180)
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1980 at #315 (769 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 19 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1961–2009
- Highest: 1 in 2,159 girls born in 1980 were named Maribel (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,858 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 22.3% of all girls named Maribel (5,544) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 10 | #1,951 (1906) | #2,006 |
| 1910s | 89 | #1,652 (1917) | #2,267 |
| 1920s | 157 | #1,672 (1923) | #2,322 |
| 1930s | 79 | #2,386 (1936) | #2,796 |
| 1940s | 54 | #2,737 (1940) | #3,762 |
| 1950s | 215 | #1,273 (1959) | #2,771 |
| 1960s | 2,437 | #468 (1969) | #691 |
| 1970s | 5,343 | #380 (1974) | #397 |
| 1980s | 5,544 | #315 (1980) | #415 |
| 1990s | 5,197 | #394 (1990) | #488 |
| 2000s | 3,378 | #598 (2005) | #789 |
| 2010s | 1,590 | #1,138 (2011) | #1,479 |
| 2020s | 777 | #1,373 (2022) | #1,649 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maribel in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 5,385 of them was named Maribel, which outranked 95.9% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).