Mark

Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194 · #244 for boys in 2025, 1,416 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1960 · 58,727 births
Debut · boys
85 births
In top 100 · boys
59 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
1,362,176
since 1880

Mark over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201911peak #6, 1960boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#2441,416
2024—#2441,447
2023#15,1945#2491,401
2022—#2471,434
2021—#2521,408
2020—#2351,552
2019—#2231,685
2018—#2101,874
2017—#2031,948
2016—#1952,066
2015—#1962,078
2014#11,9318#1892,194
2013#14,5826#1842,211
2012—#1762,204
2011—#1592,433
2010#14,9596#1622,415
2009—#1532,578
2008—#1392,916
2007#17,6365#1382,973
2006#15,1526#1283,252
2005#10,9219#1143,529
2004#9,26411#1133,770
2003#15,7845#1054,033
2002#8,83711#934,222
2001#9,35110#844,754
2000#8,02712#795,230
1999#7,71612#695,606
1998#7,10413#645,893
1997#6,48314#586,165
1996#6,39214#556,599
1995#4,51822#526,888
1994#4,52122#487,488
1993#4,99819#498,059
1992#4,84920#498,745
1991#3,93626#479,684
1990#2,69543#4710,689
1989#2,37149#4211,320
1988#1,56484#3911,715
1987#1,77666#3611,993
1986#1,48484#3512,615
1985#1,40191#3213,194
1984#1,53574#3213,214
1983#1,27896#3113,815
1982#1,30297#3213,865
1981#1,40687#3313,542
1980#1,50279#3014,169
1979#1,37789#3014,386
1978#1,31491#2614,851
1977#1,37082#2515,418
1976#1,38477#2515,508
1975#1,25889#1916,742
1974#1,063111#1618,905
1973#1,15195#1520,367
1972#1,28080#1821,490
1971#1,047115#1325,132
1970#929138#931,461
1969#892139#833,388
1968#804157#735,401
1967#843144#734,910
1966#900125#734,801
1965#933119#738,244
1964#969119#645,261
1963#953123#649,342
1962#934129#653,520
1961#835159#657,796
1960#920133#658,727
1959#918130#656,945
1958#973113#752,698
1957#1,15983#752,841
1956#1,12984#848,828
1955#1,35655#942,255
1954#1,42250#1236,198
1953#1,62237#1229,341
1952#1,54039#1725,678
1951#2,01624#2021,201
1950#1,67931#2316,604
1949#2,13421#2413,725
1948#2,58915#2910,267
1947#3,44810#477,773
1946#2,59714#585,331
1945#3,3888#723,545
1944—#932,742
1943#3,04010#1012,520
1942#3,7387#1172,039
1941#4,4205#1221,624
1940#3,8636#1491,165
1939#3,1458#170867
1938—#166902
1937#4,2555#176809
1936#3,7016#182712
1935#2,9269#174788
1934#2,18714#185702
1933—#180693
1932#3,5687#185716
1931#2,20514#197664
1930#2,55212#220591
1929#2,92110#222576
1928#2,49713#209652
1927#2,55213#200701
1926#3,2699#200702
1925#2,11918#211651
1924#2,40915#206672
1923#2,91711#203659
1922#2,61213#199667
1921#2,94111#211626
1920#2,59013#219589
1919#2,51513#212587
1918#3,2449#205627
1917#2,10016#212528
1916#4,4175#198571
1915#2,05015#204529
1914#2,6388#210386
1913#2,1649#192349
1912#2,6346#201284
1911—#207142
1910#1,9357#199131
1909—#212101
1908#1,6767#25767
1907#1,6397#19997
1906#1,9515#20585
1905—#18994
1904—#165113
1903—#19581
1902—#167104
1901#1,6795#16392
1900#1,7236#151137
1899—#16689
1898—#158108
1897—#149104
1896—#139119
1895#1,5925#151102
1894#1,4855#17984
1893—#15992
1892#1,4505#18186
1891—#15286
1890—#16983
1889—#144101
1888—#135115
1887—#16676
1886—#128106
1885—#17674
1884—#14496
1883—#14091
1882—#15390
1881—#12794
1880—#16085
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Mark was already there! It came in at #160, and was given to 85 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1905–1908, when fewer than 98 boys a year got the name.

Where Mark is popular in 1911

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedAKMaine: #78 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 278 boysMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #103 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 453 boysMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedMINew York: #201 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,147 boysNYMassachusetts: #139 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,321 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedIAIndiana: #105 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 570 boysINOhio: #194 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 1,563 boysOHPennsylvania: #136 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 1,130 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedARTennessee: #126 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 681 boysTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedALGeorgia: #142 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 895 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedHITexas: #227 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 1,144 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Mark, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Maine#78 · 1 in 278
  2. Minnesota#103 · 1 in 453
  3. Indiana#105 · 1 in 570
  4. Tennessee#126 · 1 in 681
  5. Pennsylvania#136 · 1 in 1,130

Best ever in a state: #2 in North Dakota, 1957.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maine#7851 in 278
Minnesota#10361 in 453
Indiana#10561 in 570
Tennessee#12671 in 681
Pennsylvania#136161 in 1,130
Massachusetts#13971 in 1,321
Georgia#142101 in 895
Ohio#19451 in 1,563
New York#201111 in 2,147
Texas#22781 in 1,144
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Mark
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • Held #244 since 2024
  • 9 spots since 2020 (#235 → #244)
  • 48 spots since 2015 (#196 → #244)
  • Biggest jump: 48 spots in 1886 (#176 → #128)
  • Biggest drop: 58 spots in 1908 (#199 → #257)
Rise & fade · boys
80 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1960 at #6 (58,727 births)
  • Births halved by 1971, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 10 for 16 yrs
  • Top 10: 16 yrs · run 1955–1970
  • Top 100: 59 yrs · run 1944–2002
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 36
  • Highest: 1 in 36 boys born in 1960 were named Mark (2.8%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,206 boys born in 2025 (0.08%)
Era · boys
The 1960s
  • 32.4% of all boys named Mark (441,390) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s928#127 (1881)#147
1890s953#139 (1896)#160
1900s971#151 (1900)#190
1910s4,134#192 (1913)#204
1920s6,495#199 (1922)#208
1930s7,444#166 (1938)#184
1940s50,731#24 (1949)#81
1950s382,589#6 (1959)#12
1960s441,390#6 (1960)#7
1970s194,260#9 (1970)#20
1980s129,442#30 (1980)#34
1990s75,816#47 (1990)#54
2000s37,257#79 (2000)#115
2010s21,108#159 (2011)#190
2020s8,658#235 (2020)#245

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Mark in 1911

boys
#207
142 births · 1 in 1,591 boys

Top boys' names in 1911

  1. #1John13,446
  2. #2William10,593
  3. #3James9,952
  4. #4George6,586
  5. #5Robert6,526
  6. #6Joseph6,488
  7. #7Charles5,725
  8. #8Frank4,314
  9. #9Edward4,164
  10. #10Thomas3,292
  11. #207Mark142
More about 1911

boys

225,970 boys got a published name in 1911; 1 in 1,591 of them was named Mark, which outranked 89.6% of the 1,999 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Mark
  1. #204Johnny147
  2. #205Ervin144
  3. #206Pete143
  4. #207Mark142
  5. #208Emmett141
  6. #209Delbert140
  7. #209Malcolm140
Biggest movers since 1910
Risers
  1. ↑ 900Vincenzo#1,589 → #689
  2. ↑ 900Wyman#1,589 → #689
  3. ↑ 882Rodger#1,589 → #707
  4. ↑ 796Cedric#1,589 → #793
  5. ↑ 796Hughie#1,589 → #793
Fallers
  1. ↓ 881Bertha#859 → #1,740
  2. ↓ 881Arlo#859 → #1,740
  3. ↓ 831Shelton#556 → #1,387
  4. ↓ 812Guss#928 → #1,740
  5. ↓ 812Halley#928 → #1,740

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1911 →