Marlene

#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #6,968
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1936 · 5,332 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
12 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
130,573
since 1904

Marlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201944peak #39, 1936girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,261177—
2024#1,553137—
2023#1,348167—
2022#1,256191—
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,406160—
2018#1,378163—
2017#1,233194—
2016#1,229199—
2015#1,167216—
2014#1,164211—
2013#1,073230—
2012#978257—
2011#873299—
2010#901293—
2009#739392—
2008#628491—
2007#528591—
2006#515591—
2005#538537—
2004#485606—
2003#513559—
2002#538510—
2001#544487—
2000#512519—
1999#577432—
1998#573429—
1997#531448—
1996#475519—
1995#443577—
1994#455561#6,9687
1993#407612#7,6386
1992#358716#7,4226
1991#344752#5,09610
1990#391670#5,3829
1989#411601#5,6158
1988#458489—
1987#447492#6,9515
1986#452478#6,7215
1985#474445—
1984#471437—
1983#451457#5,4846
1982#446481#5,6196
1981#472449—
1980#478440—
1979#442466—
1978#439456—
1977#417492—
1976#412492—
1975#409493—
1974#381548—
1973#386529#5,1015
1972#343655—
1971#343735#4,9075
1970#316862#4,2306
1969#304889—
1968#2701,004—
1967#2641,022—
1966#2491,141—
1965#2471,212—
1964#2441,289#3,2827
1963#2191,554#3,3187
1962#2141,557#3,6406
1961#2111,638#3,0978
1960#2081,645#3,6656
1959#2001,780—
1958#1851,964—
1957#1772,126—
1956#1702,128#3,2167
1955#1422,566#3,5056
1954#1412,651#3,8275
1953#1282,767—
1952#1173,132—
1951#1183,007#3,0667
1950#1123,130#3,6815
1949#1103,045—
1948#1093,053#3,6685
1947#1142,989—
1946#1122,818—
1945#1102,528#1,92613
1944#1062,566#3,4305
1943#1042,857#2,7328
1942#843,253#2,7128
1941#833,068#1,53220
1940#803,118#1,68017
1939#643,773#1,79515
1938#514,473#1,55919
1937#405,037#1,75616
1936#395,332#1,41722
1935#394,830#2,12712
1934#573,755#1,72517
1933#504,045#1,82915
1932#783,219#3,0927
1931#952,585#2,20712
1930#388306—
1929#603129—
1928#71099—
1927#81780—
1926#94263—
1925#97658—
1924#88073—
1923#687114—
1922#96959—
1921#1,16843—
1920#98056—
1919#1,05747—
1918#1,07346—
1917#1,12640—
1916#1,48525—
1915#1,19033—
1914#1,38521—
1913#1,17622—
1912#2,1448—
1911#1,45011—
1910#1,52110—
1909#1,7637—
1908——
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1904

The first year at least five girls were named Marlene! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Marlene is popular in 1944

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedAKMaine: #90 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 404 girlsMEVermont: #78 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 284 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #129 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 671 girlsNHWashington: #83 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 391 girlsWAIdaho: #140 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 658 girlsIDMontana: #79 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 331 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #28 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 111 girlsNDMinnesota: #43 for girls · 126 births · 1 in 189 girlsMNIllinois: #70 for girls · 191 births · 1 in 332 girlsILWisconsin: #50 for girls · 118 births · 1 in 226 girlsWIMichigan: #65 for girls · 164 births · 1 in 309 girlsMINew York: #98 for girls · 246 births · 1 in 429 girlsNYMassachusetts: #104 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 572 girlsMARhode Island: #126 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 714 girlsRIOregon: #98 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 453 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: #102 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 377 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #45 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 177 girlsSDIowa: #59 for girls · 68 births · 1 in 296 girlsIAIndiana: #103 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 570 girlsINOhio: #66 for girls · 201 births · 1 in 298 girlsOHPennsylvania: #54 for girls · 370 births · 1 in 216 girlsPANew Jersey: #87 for girls · 93 births · 1 in 352 girlsNJConnecticut: #91 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 397 girlsCTCalifornia: #102 for girls · 165 births · 1 in 484 girlsCAUtah: #128 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 600 girlsUTColorado: #105 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 444 girlsCONebraska: #44 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 193 girlsNEMissouri: #115 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 683 girlsMOKentucky: #218 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,388 girlsKYWest Virginia: #156 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 964 girlsWVVirginia: #302 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,939 girlsVAMaryland: #75 for girls · 51 births · 1 in 353 girlsMDDelaware: #49 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 202 girlsDEArizona: #140 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 544 girlsAZNew Mexico: #175 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 704 girlsNMKansas: #104 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 514 girlsKSArkansas: #323 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,430 girlsARTennessee: #355 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,454 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #279 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,166 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #291 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,167 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #135 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 709 girlsDCOklahoma: #305 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,254 girlsOKLouisiana: #197 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 925 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMSAlabama: #409 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,597 girlsALGeorgia: #392 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,963 girlsGAHawaii: #124 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 429 girlsHITexas: #396 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 3,027 girlsTXFlorida: #218 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,238 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#28 · 1 in 111
  2. Minnesota#43 · 1 in 189
  3. Nebraska#44 · 1 in 193
  4. South Dakota#45 · 1 in 177
  5. Delaware#49 · 1 in 202

Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 1936.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#28491 in 111
Minnesota#431261 in 189
Nebraska#44521 in 193
South Dakota#45271 in 177
Delaware#49111 in 202
Wisconsin#501181 in 226
Pennsylvania#543701 in 216
Iowa#59681 in 296
Michigan#651641 in 309
Ohio#662011 in 298
Illinois#701911 in 332
Maryland#75511 in 353
Vermont#7891 in 284
Montana#79121 in 331
Washington#83481 in 391
New Jersey#87931 in 352
Maine#90181 in 404
Connecticut#91361 in 397
New York#982461 in 429
Oregon#98221 in 453
California#1021651 in 484
Wyoming#10251 in 377
Indiana#103541 in 570
Kansas#104281 in 514
Massachusetts#104621 in 572
Colorado#105231 in 444
Missouri#115451 in 683
Hawaii#124111 in 429
Rhode Island#12681 in 714
Utah#128111 in 600
New Hampshire#12951 in 671
District of Columbia#135131 in 709
Arizona#140121 in 544
Idaho#14071 in 658
West Virginia#156191 in 964
New Mexico#17591 in 704
Louisiana#197291 in 925
Florida#218181 in 1,238
Kentucky#218201 in 1,388
North Carolina#279191 in 2,166
South Carolina#291111 in 2,167
Virginia#302101 in 2,939
Oklahoma#30591 in 2,254
Arkansas#32381 in 2,430
Tennessee#35591 in 3,454
Georgia#39291 in 3,963
Texas#396251 in 3,027
Alabama#40971 in 4,597
Alaska———
Mississippi———
Nevada———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 292 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,261)
  • 298 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,261)
  • 94 spots since 2015 (#1,167 → #1,261)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1931 (#388 → #95)
  • Biggest drop: 193 spots in 1924 (#687 → #880)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1904
  • Peaked 1936 at #39 (5,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1944, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1931–1942
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1922–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 195
  • Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1936 were named Marlene (0.51%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 28.6% of all girls named Marlene (37,355) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s18#1,727 (1906)#1,789
1910s263#1,057 (1919)#1,361
1920s774#603 (1929)#873
1930s37,355#39 (1936)#90
1940s29,295#80 (1940)#101
1950s25,251#112 (1950)#149
1960s12,951#208 (1960)#243
1970s5,728#316 (1970)#389
1980s4,769#411 (1989)#456
1990s5,716#344 (1991)#455
2000s5,283#485 (2004)#554
2010s2,222#873 (2011)#1,140
2020s948#1,256 (2022)#1,413

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marlene in 1944

girls
#106
2,566 births · 1 in 517 girls
boys
#3,430
5 births · 1 in 272,575 boys

Top girls' names in 1944

  1. #1Mary62,476
  2. #2Barbara39,196
  3. #3Linda38,415
  4. #4Patricia36,874
  5. #5Carol30,456
  6. #6Sandra26,024
  7. #7Nancy23,218
  8. #8Sharon22,433
  9. #9Judith22,431
  10. #10Betty19,761
  11. #106Marlene2,566

Top boys' names in 1944

  1. #1James76,951
  2. #2Robert70,855
  3. #3John66,616
  4. #4William52,375
  5. #5Richard45,643
  6. #6David37,382
  7. #7Charles34,662
  8. #8Thomas31,604
  9. #9Michael26,717
  10. #10Ronald25,513
  11. #3,430Marlene5
More about 1944

girls

1,327,223 girls got a published name in 1944; 1 in 517 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 98.0% of the 5,243 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlene
  1. #103Sheila2,665
  2. #104Constance2,634
  3. #105Cynthia2,570
  4. #106Marlene2,566
  5. #107Maureen2,536
  6. #108Jeanne2,495
  7. #109Charlene2,433
Biggest movers since 1943
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,229Dorinda#1,834 → #605
  2. ↑ 611Deirdre#1,556 → #945
  3. ↑ 504Alana#1,251 → #747
  4. ↑ 460Elyse#1,327 → #867
  5. ↑ 407Joella#1,395 → #988
Fallers
  1. ↓ 613Michal#996 → #1,609
  2. ↓ 493Aloma#762 → #1,255
  3. ↓ 448Louvenia#916 → #1,364
  4. ↓ 347Norine#889 → #1,236
  5. ↓ 341Lyla#864 → #1,205

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,362,875 boys got a published name in 1944; 1 in 272,575 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 12.3% of the 3,909 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlene
  1. #3,109Zan6
  2. #3,109Zebedee6
  3. #3,109Zelma6
  4. #3,430Marlene5
  5. #3,430Add5
  6. #3,430Adel5
  7. #3,430Adelard5

Tied with 479 names at #3,430; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1943
Risers
  1. ↑ 647Rickie#1,461 → #814
  2. ↑ 586Rusty#1,577 → #991
  3. ↑ 585Humberto#1,280 → #695
  4. ↑ 408Llewellyn#1,343 → #935
  5. ↑ 402Hilario#1,308 → #906
Fallers
  1. ↓ 359Elwyn#923 → #1,282
  2. ↓ 356Albin#856 → #1,212
  3. ↓ 348Prentiss#980 → #1,328
  4. ↓ 286Barrie#969 → #1,255
  5. ↓ 269Duke#986 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1944 →