Marlene
#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #6,968
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1936 · 5,332 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 12 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 130,573since 1904
Marlene over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,261 | 177 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,553 | 137 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,348 | 167 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,256 | 191 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,498 | 141 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,559 | 135 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,406 | 160 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,378 | 163 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,233 | 194 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,229 | 199 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,167 | 216 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,164 | 211 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,073 | 230 | — | |
| 2012 | #978 | 257 | — | |
| 2011 | #873 | 299 | — | |
| 2010 | #901 | 293 | — | |
| 2009 | #739 | 392 | — | |
| 2008 | #628 | 491 | — | |
| 2007 | #528 | 591 | — | |
| 2006 | #515 | 591 | — | |
| 2005 | #538 | 537 | — | |
| 2004 | #485 | 606 | — | |
| 2003 | #513 | 559 | — | |
| 2002 | #538 | 510 | — | |
| 2001 | #544 | 487 | — | |
| 2000 | #512 | 519 | — | |
| 1999 | #577 | 432 | — | |
| 1998 | #573 | 429 | — | |
| 1997 | #531 | 448 | — | |
| 1996 | #475 | 519 | — | |
| 1995 | #443 | 577 | — | |
| 1994 | #455 | 561 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | #407 | 612 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #358 | 716 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #344 | 752 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #391 | 670 | #5,382 | 9 |
| 1989 | #411 | 601 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #458 | 489 | — | |
| 1987 | #447 | 492 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #452 | 478 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #474 | 445 | — | |
| 1984 | #471 | 437 | — | |
| 1983 | #451 | 457 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #446 | 481 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #472 | 449 | — | |
| 1980 | #478 | 440 | — | |
| 1979 | #442 | 466 | — | |
| 1978 | #439 | 456 | — | |
| 1977 | #417 | 492 | — | |
| 1976 | #412 | 492 | — | |
| 1975 | #409 | 493 | — | |
| 1974 | #381 | 548 | — | |
| 1973 | #386 | 529 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #343 | 655 | — | |
| 1971 | #343 | 735 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #316 | 862 | #4,230 | 6 |
| 1969 | #304 | 889 | — | |
| 1968 | #270 | 1,004 | — | |
| 1967 | #264 | 1,022 | — | |
| 1966 | #249 | 1,141 | — | |
| 1965 | #247 | 1,212 | — | |
| 1964 | #244 | 1,289 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #219 | 1,554 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #214 | 1,557 | #3,640 | 6 |
| 1961 | #211 | 1,638 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #208 | 1,645 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #200 | 1,780 | — | |
| 1958 | #185 | 1,964 | — | |
| 1957 | #177 | 2,126 | — | |
| 1956 | #170 | 2,128 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | #142 | 2,566 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #141 | 2,651 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #128 | 2,767 | — | |
| 1952 | #117 | 3,132 | — | |
| 1951 | #118 | 3,007 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #112 | 3,130 | #3,681 | 5 |
| 1949 | #110 | 3,045 | — | |
| 1948 | #109 | 3,053 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #114 | 2,989 | — | |
| 1946 | #112 | 2,818 | — | |
| 1945 | #110 | 2,528 | #1,926 | 13 |
| 1944 | #106 | 2,566 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #104 | 2,857 | #2,732 | 8 |
| 1942 | #84 | 3,253 | #2,712 | 8 |
| 1941 | #83 | 3,068 | #1,532 | 20 |
| 1940 | #80 | 3,118 | #1,680 | 17 |
| 1939 | #64 | 3,773 | #1,795 | 15 |
| 1938 | #51 | 4,473 | #1,559 | 19 |
| 1937 | #40 | 5,037 | #1,756 | 16 |
| 1936 | #39 | 5,332 | #1,417 | 22 |
| 1935 | #39 | 4,830 | #2,127 | 12 |
| 1934 | #57 | 3,755 | #1,725 | 17 |
| 1933 | #50 | 4,045 | #1,829 | 15 |
| 1932 | #78 | 3,219 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #95 | 2,585 | #2,207 | 12 |
| 1930 | #388 | 306 | — | |
| 1929 | #603 | 129 | — | |
| 1928 | #710 | 99 | — | |
| 1927 | #817 | 80 | — | |
| 1926 | #942 | 63 | — | |
| 1925 | #976 | 58 | — | |
| 1924 | #880 | 73 | — | |
| 1923 | #687 | 114 | — | |
| 1922 | #969 | 59 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,168 | 43 | — | |
| 1920 | #980 | 56 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,057 | 47 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,073 | 46 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,126 | 40 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,485 | 25 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,190 | 33 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,385 | 21 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,176 | 22 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | — | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Marlene! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Marlene is popular in 1955
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#69 · 1 in 267
- New Hampshire#79 · 1 in 320
- Montana#83 · 1 in 311
- South Dakota#85 · 1 in 319
- Wyoming#89 · 1 in 336
Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 1936.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #69 | 26 | 1 in 267 |
| New Hampshire | #79 | 16 | 1 in 320 |
| Montana | #83 | 22 | 1 in 311 |
| South Dakota | #85 | 24 | 1 in 319 |
| Wyoming | #89 | 9 | 1 in 336 |
| Alaska | #96 | 8 | 1 in 324 |
| Minnesota | #96 | 87 | 1 in 418 |
| Hawaii | #99 | 19 | 1 in 319 |
| Vermont | #99 | 9 | 1 in 405 |
| Iowa | #102 | 65 | 1 in 438 |
| Utah | #104 | 25 | 1 in 409 |
| Maine | #108 | 23 | 1 in 411 |
| Wisconsin | #109 | 77 | 1 in 541 |
| Michigan | #112 | 168 | 1 in 533 |
| Nebraska | #113 | 29 | 1 in 505 |
| Pennsylvania | #114 | 242 | 1 in 466 |
| Washington | #117 | 53 | 1 in 529 |
| Oregon | #121 | 30 | 1 in 542 |
| Maryland | #124 | 49 | 1 in 586 |
| New Mexico | #124 | 24 | 1 in 449 |
| New Jersey | #126 | 86 | 1 in 624 |
| Ohio | #126 | 176 | 1 in 580 |
| Colorado | #128 | 33 | 1 in 542 |
| Delaware | #129 | 7 | 1 in 597 |
| New York | #130 | 266 | 1 in 614 |
| Massachusetts | #131 | 68 | 1 in 756 |
| West Virginia | #132 | 27 | 1 in 728 |
| Illinois | #133 | 148 | 1 in 681 |
| Louisiana | #133 | 60 | 1 in 626 |
| Kentucky | #134 | 44 | 1 in 764 |
| Arizona | #138 | 21 | 1 in 573 |
| Indiana | #139 | 68 | 1 in 709 |
| Connecticut | #141 | 28 | 1 in 822 |
| Idaho | #147 | 11 | 1 in 579 |
| California | #152 | 202 | 1 in 724 |
| Kansas | #154 | 28 | 1 in 775 |
| District of Columbia | #159 | 17 | 1 in 780 |
| Missouri | #182 | 36 | 1 in 1,209 |
| Florida | #202 | 37 | 1 in 1,071 |
| Oklahoma | #245 | 13 | 1 in 1,697 |
| Georgia | #248 | 29 | 1 in 1,587 |
| South Carolina | #262 | 17 | 1 in 1,683 |
| Virginia | #271 | 20 | 1 in 2,047 |
| Tennessee | #300 | 15 | 1 in 2,562 |
| Arkansas | #315 | 8 | 1 in 2,338 |
| Texas | #318 | 51 | 1 in 2,194 |
| North Carolina | #334 | 20 | 1 in 2,599 |
| Alabama | #354 | 12 | 1 in 3,020 |
| Mississippi | #428 | 7 | 1 in 3,928 |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Marlene
- 292 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,261)
- 298 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,261)
- 94 spots since 2015 (#1,167 → #1,261)
- Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1931 (#388 → #95)
- Biggest drop: 193 spots in 1924 (#687 → #880)
- Debuted 1904
- Peaked 1936 at #39 (5,332 births)
- Births halved by 1944, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1931–1942
- Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1922–2012
- Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1936 were named Marlene (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 28.6% of all girls named Marlene (37,355) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 18 | #1,727 (1906) | #1,789 |
| 1910s | 263 | #1,057 (1919) | #1,361 |
| 1920s | 774 | #603 (1929) | #873 |
| 1930s | 37,355 | #39 (1936) | #90 |
| 1940s | 29,295 | #80 (1940) | #101 |
| 1950s | 25,251 | #112 (1950) | #149 |
| 1960s | 12,951 | #208 (1960) | #243 |
| 1970s | 5,728 | #316 (1970) | #389 |
| 1980s | 4,769 | #411 (1989) | #456 |
| 1990s | 5,716 | #344 (1991) | #455 |
| 2000s | 5,283 | #485 (2004) | #554 |
| 2010s | 2,222 | #873 (2011) | #1,140 |
| 2020s | 948 | #1,256 (2022) | #1,413 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Marlene in 1955
Top girls' names in 1955
Top boys' names in 1955
More about 1955
girls
1,955,277 girls got a published name in 1955; 1 in 762 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 97.9% of the 6,732 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,059,889 boys got a published name in 1955; 1 in 343,315 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 20.3% of the 4,400 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,201Yvonne7
- #3,201Zebbie7
- #3,201Zvi7
- #3,505Marlene6
- #3,505Abie6
- #3,505Able6
- #3,505Addis6
- #3,886Abbott5
- #3,886Abran5
- #3,886Abron5
Tied with 380 names at #3,505; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.