Marlene

#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #6,968
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1936 · 5,332 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
12 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
130,573
since 1904

Marlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201981peak #39, 1936girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,261177—
2024#1,553137—
2023#1,348167—
2022#1,256191—
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,406160—
2018#1,378163—
2017#1,233194—
2016#1,229199—
2015#1,167216—
2014#1,164211—
2013#1,073230—
2012#978257—
2011#873299—
2010#901293—
2009#739392—
2008#628491—
2007#528591—
2006#515591—
2005#538537—
2004#485606—
2003#513559—
2002#538510—
2001#544487—
2000#512519—
1999#577432—
1998#573429—
1997#531448—
1996#475519—
1995#443577—
1994#455561#6,9687
1993#407612#7,6386
1992#358716#7,4226
1991#344752#5,09610
1990#391670#5,3829
1989#411601#5,6158
1988#458489—
1987#447492#6,9515
1986#452478#6,7215
1985#474445—
1984#471437—
1983#451457#5,4846
1982#446481#5,6196
1981#472449—
1980#478440—
1979#442466—
1978#439456—
1977#417492—
1976#412492—
1975#409493—
1974#381548—
1973#386529#5,1015
1972#343655—
1971#343735#4,9075
1970#316862#4,2306
1969#304889—
1968#2701,004—
1967#2641,022—
1966#2491,141—
1965#2471,212—
1964#2441,289#3,2827
1963#2191,554#3,3187
1962#2141,557#3,6406
1961#2111,638#3,0978
1960#2081,645#3,6656
1959#2001,780—
1958#1851,964—
1957#1772,126—
1956#1702,128#3,2167
1955#1422,566#3,5056
1954#1412,651#3,8275
1953#1282,767—
1952#1173,132—
1951#1183,007#3,0667
1950#1123,130#3,6815
1949#1103,045—
1948#1093,053#3,6685
1947#1142,989—
1946#1122,818—
1945#1102,528#1,92613
1944#1062,566#3,4305
1943#1042,857#2,7328
1942#843,253#2,7128
1941#833,068#1,53220
1940#803,118#1,68017
1939#643,773#1,79515
1938#514,473#1,55919
1937#405,037#1,75616
1936#395,332#1,41722
1935#394,830#2,12712
1934#573,755#1,72517
1933#504,045#1,82915
1932#783,219#3,0927
1931#952,585#2,20712
1930#388306—
1929#603129—
1928#71099—
1927#81780—
1926#94263—
1925#97658—
1924#88073—
1923#687114—
1922#96959—
1921#1,16843—
1920#98056—
1919#1,05747—
1918#1,07346—
1917#1,12640—
1916#1,48525—
1915#1,19033—
1914#1,38521—
1913#1,17622—
1912#2,1448—
1911#1,45011—
1910#1,52110—
1909#1,7637—
1908——
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1904

The first year at least five girls were named Marlene! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Marlene is popular in 1981

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #550 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,820 girlsMNIllinois: #430 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 3,131 girlsILWisconsin: #556 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,236 girlsWIMichigan: #514 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,888 girlsMINew York: #249 for girls · 66 births · 1 in 1,535 girlsNYMassachusetts: #598 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,324 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIAIndiana: #457 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,877 girlsINOhio: #663 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 7,225 girlsOHPennsylvania: #594 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 5,779 girlsPANew Jersey: #441 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,388 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #236 for girls · 149 births · 1 in 1,217 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNEMissouri: #628 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,416 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDEArizona: #518 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,326 girlsAZNew Mexico: #143 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 621 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: #308 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,794 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #691 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,104 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedALGeorgia: #677 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,803 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedHITexas: #596 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 4,419 girlsTXFlorida: #516 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 3,864 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#143 · 1 in 621
  2. California#236 · 1 in 1,217
  3. New York#249 · 1 in 1,535
  4. South Carolina#308 · 1 in 1,794
  5. Illinois#430 · 1 in 3,131

Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 1936.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#143151 in 621
California#2361491 in 1,217
New York#249661 in 1,535
South Carolina#308101 in 1,794
Illinois#430241 in 3,131
New Jersey#441111 in 3,388
Indiana#45791 in 3,877
Michigan#514121 in 4,888
Florida#516141 in 3,864
Arizona#51861 in 3,326
Minnesota#55051 in 5,820
Wisconsin#55651 in 6,236
Pennsylvania#594121 in 5,779
Texas#596281 in 4,419
Massachusetts#59851 in 6,324
Missouri#62851 in 6,416
Ohio#663101 in 7,225
Georgia#67761 in 5,803
Louisiana#69161 in 5,104
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 292 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,261)
  • 298 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,261)
  • 94 spots since 2015 (#1,167 → #1,261)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1931 (#388 → #95)
  • Biggest drop: 193 spots in 1924 (#687 → #880)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1904
  • Peaked 1936 at #39 (5,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1944, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1931–1942
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1922–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 195
  • Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1936 were named Marlene (0.51%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 28.6% of all girls named Marlene (37,355) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s18#1,727 (1906)#1,789
1910s263#1,057 (1919)#1,361
1920s774#603 (1929)#873
1930s37,355#39 (1936)#90
1940s29,295#80 (1940)#101
1950s25,251#112 (1950)#149
1960s12,951#208 (1960)#243
1970s5,728#316 (1970)#389
1980s4,769#411 (1989)#456
1990s5,716#344 (1991)#455
2000s5,283#485 (2004)#554
2010s2,222#873 (2011)#1,140
2020s948#1,256 (2022)#1,413

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marlene in 1981

girls
#472
449 births · 1 in 3,715 girls

Top girls' names in 1981

  1. #1Jennifer57,046
  2. #2Jessica42,531
  3. #3Amanda34,372
  4. #4Sarah28,175
  5. #5Melissa28,005
  6. #6Amy20,345
  7. #7Nicole20,310
  8. #8Stephanie20,212
  9. #9Elizabeth20,168
  10. #10Heather17,946
  11. #472Marlene449
More about 1981

girls

1,668,060 girls got a published name in 1981; 1 in 3,715 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 96.1% of the 12,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlene
  1. #469Dara453
  2. #469Selena453
  3. #471Dianna452
  4. #472Marlene449
  5. #473Betsy448
  6. #473Krystle448
  7. #475Angelique446
Biggest movers since 1980
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,850Tashina#4,743 → #893
  2. ↑ 2,742Krystle#3,215 → #473
  3. ↑ 1,800Tierra#2,342 → #542
  4. ↑ 1,398Martine#2,189 → #791
  5. ↑ 999Nereida#1,981 → #982
Fallers
  1. ↓ 764Kylene#990 → #1,754
  2. ↓ 607Renada#708 → #1,315
  3. ↓ 560Ashanti#822 → #1,382
  4. ↓ 399Renata#336 → #735
  5. ↓ 395Tracee#959 → #1,354

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1981 →