Marlene

#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #6,968
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1936 · 5,332 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
12 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
130,573
since 1904

Marlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201999peak #39, 1936girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,261177—
2024#1,553137—
2023#1,348167—
2022#1,256191—
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,406160—
2018#1,378163—
2017#1,233194—
2016#1,229199—
2015#1,167216—
2014#1,164211—
2013#1,073230—
2012#978257—
2011#873299—
2010#901293—
2009#739392—
2008#628491—
2007#528591—
2006#515591—
2005#538537—
2004#485606—
2003#513559—
2002#538510—
2001#544487—
2000#512519—
1999#577432—
1998#573429—
1997#531448—
1996#475519—
1995#443577—
1994#455561#6,9687
1993#407612#7,6386
1992#358716#7,4226
1991#344752#5,09610
1990#391670#5,3829
1989#411601#5,6158
1988#458489—
1987#447492#6,9515
1986#452478#6,7215
1985#474445—
1984#471437—
1983#451457#5,4846
1982#446481#5,6196
1981#472449—
1980#478440—
1979#442466—
1978#439456—
1977#417492—
1976#412492—
1975#409493—
1974#381548—
1973#386529#5,1015
1972#343655—
1971#343735#4,9075
1970#316862#4,2306
1969#304889—
1968#2701,004—
1967#2641,022—
1966#2491,141—
1965#2471,212—
1964#2441,289#3,2827
1963#2191,554#3,3187
1962#2141,557#3,6406
1961#2111,638#3,0978
1960#2081,645#3,6656
1959#2001,780—
1958#1851,964—
1957#1772,126—
1956#1702,128#3,2167
1955#1422,566#3,5056
1954#1412,651#3,8275
1953#1282,767—
1952#1173,132—
1951#1183,007#3,0667
1950#1123,130#3,6815
1949#1103,045—
1948#1093,053#3,6685
1947#1142,989—
1946#1122,818—
1945#1102,528#1,92613
1944#1062,566#3,4305
1943#1042,857#2,7328
1942#843,253#2,7128
1941#833,068#1,53220
1940#803,118#1,68017
1939#643,773#1,79515
1938#514,473#1,55919
1937#405,037#1,75616
1936#395,332#1,41722
1935#394,830#2,12712
1934#573,755#1,72517
1933#504,045#1,82915
1932#783,219#3,0927
1931#952,585#2,20712
1930#388306—
1929#603129—
1928#71099—
1927#81780—
1926#94263—
1925#97658—
1924#88073—
1923#687114—
1922#96959—
1921#1,16843—
1920#98056—
1919#1,05747—
1918#1,07346—
1917#1,12640—
1916#1,48525—
1915#1,19033—
1914#1,38521—
1913#1,17622—
1912#2,1448—
1911#1,45011—
1910#1,52110—
1909#1,7637—
1908——
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1904

The first year at least five girls were named Marlene! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Marlene is popular in 1999

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMNIllinois: #774 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 5,371 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMINew York: #786 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,546 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedORNevada: #428 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,845 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIAIndiana: #515 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,321 girlsINOhio: #850 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 7,692 girlsOHPennsylvania: #844 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 7,241 girlsPANew Jersey: #620 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,153 girlsNJConnecticut: #478 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,068 girlsCTCalifornia: #236 for girls · 187 births · 1 in 1,171 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedUTColorado: #606 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,295 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWVVirginia: #896 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,871 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDEArizona: #446 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,175 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #664 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,722 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,201 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,146 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedHITexas: #377 for girls · 72 births · 1 in 2,045 girlsTXFlorida: #713 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 4,981 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. California#236 · 1 in 1,171
  2. Texas#377 · 1 in 2,045
  3. Nevada#428 · 1 in 1,845
  4. Arizona#446 · 1 in 2,175
  5. Connecticut#478 · 1 in 3,068

Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 1936.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
California#2361871 in 1,171
Texas#377721 in 2,045
Nevada#42851 in 1,845
Arizona#446141 in 2,175
Connecticut#47851 in 3,068
Indiana#515101 in 3,321
Colorado#60671 in 3,295
New Jersey#620101 in 4,153
North Carolina#66491 in 4,722
Florida#713151 in 4,981
Illinois#774131 in 5,371
New York#786181 in 5,546
Pennsylvania#84481 in 7,241
Ohio#85081 in 7,692
Virginia#89651 in 6,871
Georgia#1,20151 in 9,146
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 292 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,261)
  • 298 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,261)
  • 94 spots since 2015 (#1,167 → #1,261)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1931 (#388 → #95)
  • Biggest drop: 193 spots in 1924 (#687 → #880)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1904
  • Peaked 1936 at #39 (5,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1944, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1931–1942
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1922–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 195
  • Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1936 were named Marlene (0.51%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 28.6% of all girls named Marlene (37,355) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s18#1,727 (1906)#1,789
1910s263#1,057 (1919)#1,361
1920s774#603 (1929)#873
1930s37,355#39 (1936)#90
1940s29,295#80 (1940)#101
1950s25,251#112 (1950)#149
1960s12,951#208 (1960)#243
1970s5,728#316 (1970)#389
1980s4,769#411 (1989)#456
1990s5,716#344 (1991)#455
2000s5,283#485 (2004)#554
2010s2,222#873 (2011)#1,140
2020s948#1,256 (2022)#1,413

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marlene in 1999

girls
#577
432 births · 1 in 4,106 girls

Top girls' names in 1999

  1. #1Emily26,542
  2. #2Hannah21,679
  3. #3Alexis19,237
  4. #4Sarah19,119
  5. #5Samantha19,044
  6. #6Ashley18,136
  7. #7Madison18,054
  8. #8Taylor16,906
  9. #9Jessica16,350
  10. #10Elizabeth15,350
  11. #577Marlene432
More about 1999

girls

1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 4,106 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 96.6% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlene
  1. #574Antonia433
  2. #574Lucia433
  3. #574Tina433
  4. #577Marlene432
  5. #578Savanah431
  6. #579Abbie430
  7. #580Miracle429
Biggest movers since 1998
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,407Citlalli#2,338 → #931
  2. ↑ 1,329Noelia#2,048 → #719
  3. ↑ 1,060Amaya#1,458 → #398
  4. ↑ 864Kyara#1,789 → #925
  5. ↑ 604Journey#1,557 → #953
Fallers
  1. ↓ 579Erykah#779 → #1,358
  2. ↓ 417Tea#747 → #1,164
  3. ↓ 415Tasia#800 → #1,215
  4. ↓ 406Monika#930 → #1,336
  5. ↓ 357Chase#952 → #1,309

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1999 →