Marlene

#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #6,968
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1936 · 5,332 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
12 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
130,573
since 1904

Marlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202019peak #39, 1936girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,261177—
2024#1,553137—
2023#1,348167—
2022#1,256191—
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,406160—
2018#1,378163—
2017#1,233194—
2016#1,229199—
2015#1,167216—
2014#1,164211—
2013#1,073230—
2012#978257—
2011#873299—
2010#901293—
2009#739392—
2008#628491—
2007#528591—
2006#515591—
2005#538537—
2004#485606—
2003#513559—
2002#538510—
2001#544487—
2000#512519—
1999#577432—
1998#573429—
1997#531448—
1996#475519—
1995#443577—
1994#455561#6,9687
1993#407612#7,6386
1992#358716#7,4226
1991#344752#5,09610
1990#391670#5,3829
1989#411601#5,6158
1988#458489—
1987#447492#6,9515
1986#452478#6,7215
1985#474445—
1984#471437—
1983#451457#5,4846
1982#446481#5,6196
1981#472449—
1980#478440—
1979#442466—
1978#439456—
1977#417492—
1976#412492—
1975#409493—
1974#381548—
1973#386529#5,1015
1972#343655—
1971#343735#4,9075
1970#316862#4,2306
1969#304889—
1968#2701,004—
1967#2641,022—
1966#2491,141—
1965#2471,212—
1964#2441,289#3,2827
1963#2191,554#3,3187
1962#2141,557#3,6406
1961#2111,638#3,0978
1960#2081,645#3,6656
1959#2001,780—
1958#1851,964—
1957#1772,126—
1956#1702,128#3,2167
1955#1422,566#3,5056
1954#1412,651#3,8275
1953#1282,767—
1952#1173,132—
1951#1183,007#3,0667
1950#1123,130#3,6815
1949#1103,045—
1948#1093,053#3,6685
1947#1142,989—
1946#1122,818—
1945#1102,528#1,92613
1944#1062,566#3,4305
1943#1042,857#2,7328
1942#843,253#2,7128
1941#833,068#1,53220
1940#803,118#1,68017
1939#643,773#1,79515
1938#514,473#1,55919
1937#405,037#1,75616
1936#395,332#1,41722
1935#394,830#2,12712
1934#573,755#1,72517
1933#504,045#1,82915
1932#783,219#3,0927
1931#952,585#2,20712
1930#388306—
1929#603129—
1928#71099—
1927#81780—
1926#94263—
1925#97658—
1924#88073—
1923#687114—
1922#96959—
1921#1,16843—
1920#98056—
1919#1,05747—
1918#1,07346—
1917#1,12640—
1916#1,48525—
1915#1,19033—
1914#1,38521—
1913#1,17622—
1912#2,1448—
1911#1,45011—
1910#1,52110—
1909#1,7637—
1908——
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1904

The first year at least five girls were named Marlene! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Marlene is popular in 2019

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNHWashington: #835 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,254 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,517 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,316 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,236 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,976 girlsMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedINOhio: #1,276 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,427 girlsOHPennsylvania: #939 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,543 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #769 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 4,292 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDEArizona: #1,045 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,724 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marlene, so not publishedHITexas: #972 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 5,663 girlsTXFlorida: #1,831 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,098 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. California#769 · 1 in 4,292
  2. Washington#835 · 1 in 4,254
  3. Pennsylvania#939 · 1 in 5,543
  4. Texas#972 · 1 in 5,663
  5. Arizona#1,045 · 1 in 5,724

Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 1936.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
California#769431 in 4,292
Washington#83571 in 4,254
Pennsylvania#93991 in 5,543
Texas#972281 in 5,663
Arizona#1,04551 in 5,724
Michigan#1,23651 in 7,976
Ohio#1,27661 in 8,427
Illinois#1,51751 in 10,316
Florida#1,83161 in 14,098
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 292 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,261)
  • 298 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,261)
  • 94 spots since 2015 (#1,167 → #1,261)
  • Biggest jump: 293 spots in 1931 (#388 → #95)
  • Biggest drop: 193 spots in 1924 (#687 → #880)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1904
  • Peaked 1936 at #39 (5,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1944, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1931–1942
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1922–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 195
  • Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1936 were named Marlene (0.51%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 28.6% of all girls named Marlene (37,355) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s18#1,727 (1906)#1,789
1910s263#1,057 (1919)#1,361
1920s774#603 (1929)#873
1930s37,355#39 (1936)#90
1940s29,295#80 (1940)#101
1950s25,251#112 (1950)#149
1960s12,951#208 (1960)#243
1970s5,728#316 (1970)#389
1980s4,769#411 (1989)#456
1990s5,716#344 (1991)#455
2000s5,283#485 (2004)#554
2010s2,222#873 (2011)#1,140
2020s948#1,256 (2022)#1,413

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marlene in 2019

girls
#1,406
160 births · 1 in 10,490 girls

Top girls' names in 2019

  1. #1Olivia18,577
  2. #2Emma17,226
  3. #3Ava14,549
  4. #4Sophia13,821
  5. #5Isabella13,407
  6. #6Charlotte13,239
  7. #7Amelia12,944
  8. #8Mia12,508
  9. #9Harper10,497
  10. #10Evelyn10,443
  11. #1,406Marlene160
More about 2019

girls

1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 10,490 of them was named Marlene, which outranked 92.2% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlene
  1. #1,392Stacy161
  2. #1,392Tala161
  3. #1,392Tia161
  4. #1,406Marlene160
  5. #1,406Austin160
  6. #1,406Geneva160
  7. #1,406Nadine160
  8. #1,412Journie159
  9. #1,412Sherlyn159
  10. #1,412Yalitza159

Tied with 5 names at #1,406; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2018
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,081Amoura#2,059 → #978
  2. ↑ 553Theodora#1,406 → #853
  3. ↑ 456Navy#1,269 → #813
  4. ↑ 415Emani#1,371 → #956
  5. ↑ 403Yaritza#1,216 → #813
Fallers
  1. ↓ 451Emmarie#990 → #1,441
  2. ↓ 368Saniyah#934 → #1,302
  3. ↓ 252Tatiana#692 → #944
  4. ↓ 229Zhavia#879 → #1,108
  5. ↓ 219Jayden#979 → #1,198

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2019 →