Marquel
- Last seen for girls in 2010 at #16,992
- #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
- Given to boys 91.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1995 · 121 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,712since 1970
Marquel over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #6,446 | 13 | |
| 2024 | — | #6,199 | 14 | |
| 2023 | — | #5,927 | 15 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,995 | 27 | |
| 2021 | — | #4,118 | 25 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,497 | 31 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,052 | 39 | |
| 2018 | — | #3,524 | 31 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,891 | 41 | |
| 2016 | — | #3,293 | 34 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,722 | 44 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,754 | 43 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,623 | 45 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,772 | 43 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,504 | 49 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #2,324 | 55 |
| 2009 | — | #2,560 | 49 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,583 | 48 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,928 | 73 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,943 | 69 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,869 | 68 | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #1,834 | 67 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #1,673 | 74 |
| 2002 | — | #1,869 | 60 | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #1,629 | 72 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #1,323 | 97 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #1,259 | 98 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #1,092 | 118 |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 | #1,096 | 115 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #1,107 | 108 |
| 1995 | #5,221 | 18 | #1,010 | 121 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #1,063 | 110 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | #1,205 | 87 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #1,084 | 103 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #1,196 | 86 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #1,226 | 80 |
| 1989 | #6,160 | 13 | #1,268 | 73 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | #1,576 | 46 |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #1,272 | 59 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #1,760 | 35 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #1,794 | 33 |
| 1984 | — | #1,630 | 36 | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #2,577 | 18 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #2,596 | 18 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | — | #2,617 | 18 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,669 | 17 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,070 | 13 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,791 | 15 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,709 | 15 | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #3,659 | 9 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #2,549 | 15 |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #3,694 | 8 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #3,282 | 9 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1970
The first year at least five boys were named Marquel! It came in at #3,282, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1972, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Marquel is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Marquel in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Marquel
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 2,949 spots since 2020 (#3,497 → #6,446)
Rise & fade · boys
25 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1970
- Peaked 1995 at #1,010 (121 births)
- Births halved by 2002, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 15,733
- Highest: 1 in 15,733 boys born in 1995 were named Marquel (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 131,390 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 37.8% of all boys named Marquel (1,026) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1973
- Mostly girls until 1972, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 108 | #2,549 (1974) | #3,154 |
| 1980s | 352 | #1,268 (1989) | #1,987 |
| 1990s | 1,026 | #1,010 (1995) | #1,134 |
| 2000s | 677 | #1,323 (2000) | #1,921 |
| 2010s | 424 | #2,324 (2010) | #2,846 |
| 2020s | 125 | #3,497 (2020) | #5,030 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Marquel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: