Martin
- Last seen for girls in 2014 at #16,513
- #335 for boys in 2025, 1,009 births
- Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 357 births
- Debut · boys
- 357 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 91 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 315,561since 1880
Martin over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #335 | 1,009 | |
| 2024 | — | #307 | 1,105 | |
| 2023 | — | #288 | 1,152 | |
| 2022 | — | #303 | 1,108 | |
| 2021 | — | #300 | 1,103 | |
| 2020 | — | #293 | 1,168 | |
| 2019 | — | #281 | 1,253 | |
| 2018 | — | #272 | 1,296 | |
| 2017 | — | #282 | 1,283 | |
| 2016 | — | #258 | 1,396 | |
| 2015 | — | #275 | 1,344 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #259 | 1,434 |
| 2013 | — | #265 | 1,346 | |
| 2012 | — | #265 | 1,350 | |
| 2011 | — | #262 | 1,321 | |
| 2010 | — | #257 | 1,333 | |
| 2009 | — | #234 | 1,526 | |
| 2008 | — | #221 | 1,700 | |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #208 | 1,881 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #199 | 1,942 |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | #206 | 1,836 |
| 2004 | — | #203 | 1,858 | |
| 2003 | — | #198 | 1,889 | |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #192 | 1,959 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #182 | 2,061 |
| 2000 | — | #175 | 2,110 | |
| 1999 | — | #173 | 2,036 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #165 | 2,068 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #155 | 2,230 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #152 | 2,282 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | #147 | 2,398 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #135 | 2,594 |
| 1993 | #4,524 | 22 | #124 | 2,818 |
| 1992 | #5,718 | 16 | #118 | 2,932 |
| 1991 | #5,949 | 15 | #115 | 2,893 |
| 1990 | #3,909 | 26 | #113 | 3,080 |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | #117 | 2,797 |
| 1988 | #4,496 | 19 | #116 | 2,652 |
| 1987 | #3,101 | 30 | #118 | 2,406 |
| 1986 | #2,620 | 37 | #119 | 2,377 |
| 1985 | #3,621 | 23 | #132 | 2,136 |
| 1984 | #3,726 | 21 | #126 | 2,136 |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 | #122 | 2,175 |
| 1982 | #3,093 | 28 | #126 | 2,169 |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | #127 | 2,151 |
| 1980 | #3,609 | 22 | #123 | 2,227 |
| 1979 | #3,333 | 24 | #133 | 2,019 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #126 | 2,050 |
| 1977 | #3,176 | 24 | #125 | 2,155 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #118 | 2,168 |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | #119 | 2,162 |
| 1974 | #3,426 | 19 | #109 | 2,371 |
| 1973 | #3,635 | 17 | #108 | 2,399 |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | #117 | 2,421 |
| 1971 | #3,652 | 17 | #105 | 3,022 |
| 1970 | #3,311 | 19 | #93 | 3,500 |
| 1969 | #2,844 | 22 | #78 | 3,758 |
| 1968 | #2,360 | 27 | #68 | 4,073 |
| 1967 | #2,706 | 21 | #80 | 3,834 |
| 1966 | #2,586 | 22 | #78 | 4,210 |
| 1965 | #2,345 | 26 | #67 | 4,932 |
| 1964 | #2,109 | 32 | #63 | 5,727 |
| 1963 | #2,960 | 18 | #62 | 6,073 |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 | #74 | 5,538 |
| 1961 | #2,752 | 20 | #73 | 5,476 |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | #77 | 5,495 |
| 1959 | #3,104 | 15 | #79 | 5,353 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | #71 | 5,669 |
| 1957 | #2,563 | 20 | #69 | 5,965 |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | #73 | 5,682 |
| 1955 | #2,472 | 20 | #77 | 5,068 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | #79 | 4,968 |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | #82 | 4,778 |
| 1952 | #2,921 | 14 | #80 | 4,735 |
| 1951 | #3,284 | 11 | #81 | 4,596 |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | #85 | 4,180 |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | #83 | 3,903 |
| 1948 | #3,137 | 11 | #88 | 3,698 |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | #90 | 3,724 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #92 | 3,333 |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #90 | 2,823 |
| 1944 | #2,946 | 10 | #91 | 2,767 |
| 1943 | #3,249 | 9 | #83 | 3,081 |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | #85 | 3,045 |
| 1941 | #2,846 | 10 | #85 | 2,605 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | #85 | 2,423 |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 | #91 | 2,192 |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | #87 | 2,313 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | #87 | 2,278 |
| 1936 | #2,263 | 13 | #92 | 2,106 |
| 1935 | #2,095 | 15 | #93 | 2,116 |
| 1934 | #2,289 | 13 | #91 | 2,178 |
| 1933 | #2,161 | 14 | #89 | 2,064 |
| 1932 | #1,877 | 18 | #88 | 2,255 |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | #91 | 2,103 |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | #83 | 2,322 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | #83 | 2,308 |
| 1928 | #2,094 | 17 | #83 | 2,428 |
| 1927 | #1,885 | 21 | #87 | 2,383 |
| 1926 | #2,076 | 18 | #80 | 2,493 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 | #83 | 2,417 |
| 1924 | #2,409 | 15 | #82 | 2,452 |
| 1923 | #2,264 | 16 | #80 | 2,460 |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | #80 | 2,402 |
| 1921 | #2,378 | 15 | #78 | 2,461 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 | #78 | 2,439 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #81 | 2,204 |
| 1918 | — | #81 | 2,403 | |
| 1917 | #3,713 | 7 | #77 | 2,336 |
| 1916 | #2,658 | 11 | #81 | 2,122 |
| 1915 | #1,964 | 16 | #79 | 2,070 |
| 1914 | #1,818 | 14 | #73 | 1,676 |
| 1913 | #2,034 | 10 | #75 | 1,259 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #75 | 1,064 |
| 1911 | #1,792 | 8 | #75 | 567 |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #86 | 396 |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | #79 | 391 |
| 1908 | — | #83 | 331 | |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | #79 | 329 |
| 1906 | — | #75 | 334 | |
| 1905 | — | #75 | 332 | |
| 1904 | — | #71 | 334 | |
| 1903 | — | #77 | 283 | |
| 1902 | — | #72 | 325 | |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #64 | 304 |
| 1900 | — | #70 | 383 | |
| 1899 | — | #72 | 260 | |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 | #63 | 339 |
| 1897 | — | #60 | 312 | |
| 1896 | — | #61 | 343 | |
| 1895 | — | #65 | 317 | |
| 1894 | — | #66 | 299 | |
| 1893 | — | #61 | 347 | |
| 1892 | — | #61 | 359 | |
| 1891 | — | #56 | 331 | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #57 | 347 |
| 1889 | — | #53 | 367 | |
| 1888 | — | #54 | 378 | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | #51 | 331 |
| 1886 | — | #58 | 329 | |
| 1885 | — | #49 | 357 | |
| 1884 | — | #48 | 385 | |
| 1883 | — | #46 | 377 | |
| 1882 | — | #48 | 387 | |
| 1881 | — | #46 | 327 | |
| 1880 | — | #44 | 357 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Martin was already there! It came in at #44, and was given to 357 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1908, when fewer than 390 boys a year got the name.
Where Martin is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- District of Columbia#82 · 1 in 253
- Arizona#203 · 1 in 798
- California#203 · 1 in 954
- Minnesota#218 · 1 in 845
- Florida#267 · 1 in 1,225
Best ever in a state: #16 in Nevada, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #82 | 10 | 1 in 253 |
| Arizona | #203 | 41 | 1 in 798 |
| California | #203 | 184 | 1 in 954 |
| Minnesota | #218 | 29 | 1 in 845 |
| Florida | #267 | 78 | 1 in 1,225 |
| Washington | #271 | 27 | 1 in 1,215 |
| New York | #282 | 66 | 1 in 1,279 |
| Utah | #288 | 17 | 1 in 1,157 |
| Illinois | #289 | 37 | 1 in 1,339 |
| Colorado | #293 | 22 | 1 in 1,221 |
| Oregon | #295 | 14 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Texas | #309 | 122 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Iowa | #310 | 12 | 1 in 1,152 |
| New Jersey | #313 | 27 | 1 in 1,473 |
| Wisconsin | #317 | 17 | 1 in 1,378 |
| Massachusetts | #318 | 17 | 1 in 1,589 |
| Kansas | #324 | 11 | 1 in 1,277 |
| New Mexico | #360 | 5 | 1 in 1,300 |
| Maryland | #364 | 14 | 1 in 1,636 |
| Nebraska | #377 | 6 | 1 in 1,470 |
| Connecticut | #382 | 7 | 1 in 1,887 |
| Nevada | #389 | 7 | 1 in 1,613 |
| Pennsylvania | #397 | 26 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Virginia | #408 | 19 | 1 in 1,961 |
| North Carolina | #416 | 26 | 1 in 1,980 |
| Tennessee | #430 | 18 | 1 in 2,043 |
| Arkansas | #444 | 7 | 1 in 1,798 |
| Louisiana | #450 | 10 | 1 in 1,913 |
| Michigan | #461 | 18 | 1 in 2,233 |
| Alabama | #484 | 10 | 1 in 2,152 |
| South Carolina | #501 | 9 | 1 in 2,355 |
| Ohio | #513 | 20 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Mississippi | #522 | 5 | 1 in 2,167 |
| Indiana | #579 | 11 | 1 in 2,878 |
| Georgia | #594 | 17 | 1 in 2,954 |
| Missouri | #597 | 9 | 1 in 3,090 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Martin
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 42 spots since 2020 (#293 → #335)
- Biggest jump: 17 spots in 2016
- Biggest drop: 28 spots in 2025
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #44 (357 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 91 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 91 yrs · run 1880–1970
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 278
- Highest: 1 in 278 boys born in 1883 were named Martin (0.36%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,693 boys born in 2025 (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #44 in 1880, was only 1 in 309 (0.32%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1950s
- 16.2% of all boys named Martin (50,994) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,595 | #44 (1880) | #50 |
| 1890s | 3,254 | #56 (1891) | #62 |
| 1900s | 3,346 | #64 (1901) | #75 |
| 1910s | 16,097 | #73 (1914) | #78 |
| 1920s | 24,243 | #78 (1921) | #81 |
| 1930s | 21,927 | #83 (1930) | #89 |
| 1940s | 31,402 | #83 (1949) | #87 |
| 1950s | 50,994 | #69 (1957) | #78 |
| 1960s | 49,116 | #62 (1963) | #72 |
| 1970s | 24,267 | #93 (1970) | #115 |
| 1980s | 23,226 | #116 (1988) | #123 |
| 1990s | 25,331 | #113 (1990) | #140 |
| 2000s | 18,762 | #175 (2000) | #202 |
| 2010s | 13,356 | #257 (2010) | #268 |
| 2020s | 6,645 | #288 (2023) | #304 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Martin ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: