Maryjo
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births
- Peak · girls
- 1960 · 293 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,109since 1915
Maryjo over time
Rank among girls' names. Maryjo has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 |
| 2023 | #6,680 | 17 |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 |
| 2018 | #10,545 | 9 |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 |
| 2015 | #9,481 | 11 |
| 2014 | #13,069 | 7 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 |
| 2003 | #9,048 | 11 |
| 2002 | #5,444 | 21 |
| 2001 | #6,322 | 17 |
| 2000 | #4,527 | 26 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 |
| 1998 | #4,636 | 23 |
| 1997 | #3,626 | 31 |
| 1996 | #4,453 | 23 |
| 1995 | #4,518 | 22 |
| 1994 | #3,372 | 33 |
| 1993 | #3,987 | 26 |
| 1992 | #3,503 | 31 |
| 1991 | #3,936 | 26 |
| 1990 | #3,813 | 27 |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 |
| 1988 | #2,597 | 41 |
| 1987 | #2,276 | 47 |
| 1986 | #3,277 | 27 |
| 1985 | #2,749 | 34 |
| 1984 | #2,677 | 34 |
| 1983 | #2,198 | 44 |
| 1982 | #2,414 | 40 |
| 1981 | #2,158 | 47 |
| 1980 | #2,308 | 42 |
| 1979 | #1,952 | 53 |
| 1978 | #1,804 | 56 |
| 1977 | #1,576 | 68 |
| 1976 | #1,820 | 51 |
| 1975 | #1,640 | 59 |
| 1974 | #1,315 | 81 |
| 1973 | #1,458 | 65 |
| 1972 | #1,212 | 88 |
| 1971 | #1,204 | 94 |
| 1970 | #997 | 125 |
| 1969 | #912 | 135 |
| 1968 | #898 | 132 |
| 1967 | #914 | 125 |
| 1966 | #815 | 149 |
| 1965 | #774 | 164 |
| 1964 | #642 | 255 |
| 1963 | #640 | 250 |
| 1962 | #587 | 285 |
| 1961 | #590 | 293 |
| 1960 | #576 | 293 |
| 1959 | #708 | 199 |
| 1958 | #708 | 194 |
| 1957 | #708 | 196 |
| 1956 | #761 | 164 |
| 1955 | #754 | 158 |
| 1954 | #656 | 195 |
| 1953 | #688 | 172 |
| 1952 | #720 | 153 |
| 1951 | #760 | 134 |
| 1950 | #777 | 124 |
| 1949 | #729 | 135 |
| 1948 | #849 | 106 |
| 1947 | #751 | 130 |
| 1946 | #686 | 135 |
| 1945 | #773 | 93 |
| 1944 | #787 | 94 |
| 1943 | #691 | 121 |
| 1942 | #725 | 106 |
| 1941 | #815 | 78 |
| 1940 | #894 | 64 |
| 1939 | #857 | 67 |
| 1938 | #870 | 65 |
| 1937 | #1,002 | 49 |
| 1936 | #1,135 | 39 |
| 1935 | #1,039 | 44 |
| 1934 | #1,221 | 34 |
| 1933 | #1,470 | 25 |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 |
| 1931 | #1,941 | 17 |
| 1930 | #2,202 | 15 |
| 1929 | #2,191 | 15 |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 |
| 1927 | #2,169 | 17 |
| 1926 | #2,165 | 17 |
| 1925 | #2,778 | 12 |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 |
| 1923 | #1,736 | 24 |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 |
| 1921 | #2,282 | 16 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 |
| 1917 | #2,552 | 12 |
| 1916 | #2,833 | 10 |
| 1915 | #3,795 | 6 |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Maryjo! It came in at #3,795, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2009–2010, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Maryjo is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#243 · 1 in 1,324
- Minnesota#249 · 1 in 1,845
- Wisconsin#255 · 1 in 2,042
- Pennsylvania#315 · 1 in 2,659
- Nebraska#356 · 1 in 2,893
Best ever in a state: #200 in Minnesota, 1949.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #243 | 5 | 1 in 1,324 |
| Minnesota | #249 | 21 | 1 in 1,845 |
| Wisconsin | #255 | 22 | 1 in 2,042 |
| Pennsylvania | #315 | 42 | 1 in 2,659 |
| Nebraska | #356 | 5 | 1 in 2,893 |
| Ohio | #360 | 33 | 1 in 3,187 |
| New Jersey | #378 | 15 | 1 in 3,854 |
| Michigan | #410 | 21 | 1 in 4,205 |
| New York | #444 | 39 | 1 in 4,300 |
| Iowa | #456 | 5 | 1 in 5,629 |
| Massachusetts | #457 | 7 | 1 in 7,530 |
| Illinois | #514 | 19 | 1 in 5,664 |
| California | #912 | 13 | 1 in 13,280 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maryjo
- 2,525 spots since 2024 (#6,932 → #9,457)
- 504 spots since 2020 (#8,953 → #9,457)
- 24 spots since 2015 (#9,481 → #9,457)
- Biggest jump: 132 spots in 1938 (#1,002 → #870)
- Biggest drop: 207 spots in 1971 (#997 → #1,204)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1960 at #576 (293 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 33 yrs · run 1938–1970
- Highest: 1 in 6,889 girls born in 1961 were named Maryjo (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 160,727 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #576 in 1960, was only 1 in 6,901 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 29.3% of all girls named Maryjo (2,081) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 44 | #2,552 (1917) | #3,229 |
| 1920s | 160 | #1,736 (1923) | #2,318 |
| 1930s | 371 | #857 (1939) | #1,377 |
| 1940s | 1,062 | #686 (1946) | #770 |
| 1950s | 1,689 | #656 (1954) | #724 |
| 1960s | 2,081 | #576 (1960) | #735 |
| 1970s | 740 | #997 (1970) | #1,498 |
| 1980s | 381 | #2,158 (1981) | #2,655 |
| 1990s | 255 | #3,372 (1994) | #4,308 |
| 2000s | 162 | #4,527 (2000) | #7,991 |
| 2010s | 93 | #6,663 (2016) | #11,252 |
| 2020s | 71 | #6,680 (2023) | #8,971 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maryjo in 1960
Top girls' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 6,901 of them was named Maryjo, which outranked 92.1% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.