Matteo
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462 · #146 for boys in 2025, 2,455 births
Given to boys >99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 2,589 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 33,483since 1911
Matteo over time
Rank among boys' names. Matteo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #146 | 2,455 | |
| 2024 | — | #138 | 2,589 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #144 | 2,517 |
| 2022 | — | #183 | 2,048 | |
| 2021 | — | #165 | 2,356 | |
| 2020 | — | #173 | 2,223 | |
| 2019 | — | #179 | 2,161 | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #196 | 2,095 |
| 2017 | — | #188 | 2,082 | |
| 2016 | — | #169 | 2,387 | |
| 2015 | — | #191 | 2,171 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #374 | 836 |
| 2013 | — | #377 | 798 | |
| 2012 | — | #410 | 707 | |
| 2011 | — | #385 | 751 | |
| 2010 | — | #429 | 642 | |
| 2009 | — | #455 | 600 | |
| 2008 | — | #556 | 473 | |
| 2007 | — | #624 | 392 | |
| 2006 | — | #623 | 381 | |
| 2005 | — | #682 | 306 | |
| 2004 | — | #697 | 277 | |
| 2003 | — | #738 | 244 | |
| 2002 | — | #795 | 217 | |
| 2001 | — | #897 | 175 | |
| 2000 | — | #890 | 176 | |
| 1999 | — | #940 | 155 | |
| 1998 | — | #931 | 151 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,154 | 106 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,375 | 77 | |
| 1995 | — | #2,210 | 36 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,347 | 33 | |
| 1993 | — | #2,257 | 34 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,214 | 34 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,606 | 26 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,695 | 24 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,359 | 28 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,599 | 22 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,339 | 14 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,440 | 13 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,357 | 22 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,107 | 14 | |
| 1983 | — | #3,071 | 14 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,108 | 14 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,569 | 18 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,965 | 15 | |
| 1979 | — | #4,403 | 8 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,070 | 13 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,910 | 14 | |
| 1976 | — | #3,095 | 12 | |
| 1975 | — | #4,309 | 7 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,946 | 12 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,857 | 12 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,323 | 16 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,558 | 14 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,739 | 12 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,314 | 8 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,907 | 9 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,242 | 13 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,178 | 14 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,646 | 6 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | #2,538 | 11 | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,993 | 5 | |
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #2,862 | 7 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #2,449 | 9 | |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,332 | 10 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | #2,719 | 8 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,101 | 13 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,317 | 12 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,569 | 23 | |
| 1927 | — | #3,780 | 6 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,911 | 17 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,414 | 28 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,816 | 19 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,503 | 25 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,804 | 10 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,642 | 22 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,115 | 8 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,073 | 15 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,900 | 16 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,152 | 13 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,782 | 16 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,868 | 12 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,803 | 10 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,045 | 7 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,740 | 5 | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Matteo! It came in at #1,740, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1933–1934, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Matteo is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#190 · 1 in 706
- New Jersey#208 · 1 in 1,169
- New York#246 · 1 in 1,436
- Massachusetts#290 · 1 in 1,779
- Connecticut#290 · 1 in 1,795
Best ever in a state: #54 in New Mexico, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #190 | 6 | 1 in 706 |
| New Jersey | #208 | 39 | 1 in 1,169 |
| New York | #246 | 76 | 1 in 1,436 |
| Connecticut | #290 | 9 | 1 in 1,795 |
| Massachusetts | #290 | 18 | 1 in 1,779 |
| California | #338 | 115 | 1 in 2,210 |
| Florida | #427 | 38 | 1 in 2,645 |
| Washington | #481 | 13 | 1 in 2,865 |
| Pennsylvania | #491 | 17 | 1 in 3,757 |
| Michigan | #551 | 13 | 1 in 3,954 |
| Colorado | #558 | 8 | 1 in 3,710 |
| Maryland | #683 | 6 | 1 in 4,984 |
| Illinois | #703 | 14 | 1 in 5,340 |
| Minnesota | #714 | 5 | 1 in 5,967 |
| Arizona | #727 | 7 | 1 in 6,201 |
| Virginia | #752 | 7 | 1 in 6,139 |
| Ohio | #849 | 8 | 1 in 8,054 |
| Tennessee | #863 | 5 | 1 in 7,543 |
| Texas | #894 | 21 | 1 in 9,009 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Matteo
- 8 spots since 2024 (#138 → #146)
- 27 spots since 2020 (#173 → #146)
- 45 spots since 2015 (#191 → #146)
- Biggest jump: 223 spots in 1998 (#1,154 → #931)
- Biggest drop: 25 spots in 2012 (#385 → #410)
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 2024 at #138 (2,589 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Highest: 1 in 665 boys born in 2024 were named Matteo (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 696 boys born in 2025 (0.14%)
- 43.7% of all boys named Matteo (14,630) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 102 | #1,740 (1911) | #2,053 |
| 1920s | 180 | #1,414 (1924) | #2,063 |
| 1930s | 65 | #2,101 (1932) | #2,870 |
| 1940s | 7 | #2,862 (1944) | #2,862 |
| 1950s | 26 | #3,505 (1955) | #3,824 |
| 1960s | 74 | #2,178 (1965) | #2,978 |
| 1970s | 120 | #2,323 (1972) | #3,121 |
| 1980s | 174 | #2,357 (1985) | #2,891 |
| 1990s | 676 | #931 (1998) | #1,873 |
| 2000s | 3,241 | #455 (2009) | #696 |
| 2010s | 14,630 | #169 (2016) | #290 |
| 2020s | 14,188 | #138 (2024) | #158 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Matteo in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 4,313 of them was named Matteo, which outranked 96.2% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).