Matthew
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #32 for boys in 2025, 7,003 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1995 · 32,882 births
- Debut · boys
- 113 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 70 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,654,075since 1880
Matthew over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #32 | 7,003 |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #33 | 7,107 |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #32 | 7,234 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | #39 | 7,077 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 | #36 | 7,489 |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | #30 | 8,142 |
| 2019 | #7,342 | 15 | #23 | 9,277 |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | #20 | 10,009 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | #16 | 11,732 |
| 2016 | #8,875 | 12 | #15 | 12,665 |
| 2015 | #7,613 | 15 | #15 | 12,785 |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | #16 | 12,944 |
| 2013 | #7,031 | 17 | #15 | 13,364 |
| 2012 | #6,110 | 21 | #12 | 13,993 |
| 2011 | #5,935 | 22 | #12 | 14,184 |
| 2010 | #7,880 | 15 | #16 | 14,148 |
| 2009 | #7,066 | 18 | #13 | 16,010 |
| 2008 | #5,955 | 23 | #10 | 17,604 |
| 2007 | #5,895 | 23 | #9 | 18,756 |
| 2006 | #5,906 | 22 | #5 | 20,339 |
| 2005 | #4,195 | 33 | #4 | 21,483 |
| 2004 | #1,811 | 105 | #4 | 22,882 |
| 2003 | #3,655 | 38 | #4 | 24,011 |
| 2002 | #3,810 | 34 | #4 | 25,154 |
| 2001 | #2,924 | 49 | #3 | 26,812 |
| 2000 | #3,121 | 44 | #3 | 28,580 |
| 1999 | #3,374 | 37 | #3 | 30,418 |
| 1998 | #2,498 | 55 | #3 | 31,146 |
| 1997 | #2,622 | 48 | #3 | 31,517 |
| 1996 | #2,041 | 68 | #2 | 32,077 |
| 1995 | #2,125 | 63 | #2 | 32,882 |
| 1994 | #1,905 | 74 | #3 | 33,654 |
| 1993 | #1,985 | 70 | #3 | 35,782 |
| 1992 | #1,630 | 93 | #3 | 37,733 |
| 1991 | #1,517 | 102 | #3 | 41,647 |
| 1990 | #1,300 | 125 | #3 | 44,826 |
| 1989 | #995 | 173 | #3 | 45,375 |
| 1988 | #740 | 253 | #3 | 45,876 |
| 1987 | #651 | 289 | #3 | 46,511 |
| 1986 | #656 | 281 | #3 | 46,929 |
| 1985 | #632 | 294 | #3 | 47,075 |
| 1984 | #611 | 293 | #3 | 49,767 |
| 1983 | #570 | 317 | #3 | 50,209 |
| 1982 | #653 | 273 | #3 | 46,045 |
| 1981 | #801 | 201 | #3 | 43,330 |
| 1980 | #819 | 193 | #6 | 37,834 |
| 1979 | #912 | 162 | #6 | 35,621 |
| 1978 | #910 | 156 | #6 | 34,282 |
| 1977 | #869 | 167 | #9 | 31,965 |
| 1976 | #924 | 140 | #9 | 29,951 |
| 1975 | #1,048 | 113 | #9 | 28,527 |
| 1974 | #1,082 | 108 | #9 | 27,194 |
| 1973 | #1,054 | 110 | #10 | 24,531 |
| 1972 | #996 | 119 | #10 | 22,928 |
| 1971 | #1,211 | 93 | #19 | 22,543 |
| 1970 | #1,526 | 64 | #24 | 20,185 |
| 1969 | #1,370 | 70 | #24 | 17,462 |
| 1968 | #1,258 | 76 | #24 | 15,823 |
| 1967 | #1,617 | 49 | #28 | 13,568 |
| 1966 | #1,827 | 39 | #34 | 10,803 |
| 1965 | #2,464 | 24 | #36 | 9,982 |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | #43 | 8,981 |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | #50 | 8,034 |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #56 | 7,279 |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | #59 | 7,081 |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | #61 | 6,925 |
| 1959 | #2,395 | 23 | #63 | 6,542 |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | #60 | 6,377 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #83 | 5,234 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #90 | 4,366 |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #105 | 3,279 |
| 1954 | — | #124 | 2,688 | |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #130 | 2,374 |
| 1952 | — | #142 | 2,032 | |
| 1951 | — | #163 | 1,605 | |
| 1950 | — | #174 | 1,299 | |
| 1949 | — | #176 | 1,219 | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #190 | 1,054 |
| 1947 | — | #196 | 1,045 | |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | #194 | 892 |
| 1945 | — | #198 | 730 | |
| 1944 | — | #195 | 765 | |
| 1943 | — | #197 | 822 | |
| 1942 | — | #189 | 842 | |
| 1941 | — | #198 | 727 | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #198 | 664 |
| 1939 | — | #201 | 622 | |
| 1938 | — | #205 | 608 | |
| 1937 | — | #201 | 605 | |
| 1936 | — | #202 | 608 | |
| 1935 | — | #195 | 654 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #202 | 610 |
| 1933 | — | #201 | 581 | |
| 1932 | — | #188 | 702 | |
| 1931 | — | #208 | 608 | |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | #204 | 657 |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #189 | 727 |
| 1928 | — | #182 | 784 | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #183 | 790 |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #185 | 777 |
| 1925 | — | #174 | 840 | |
| 1924 | — | #171 | 850 | |
| 1923 | — | #163 | 935 | |
| 1922 | — | #159 | 982 | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #161 | 914 |
| 1920 | — | #151 | 967 | |
| 1919 | — | #152 | 879 | |
| 1918 | — | #148 | 963 | |
| 1917 | — | #149 | 862 | |
| 1916 | — | #148 | 825 | |
| 1915 | — | #150 | 798 | |
| 1914 | — | #151 | 613 | |
| 1913 | — | #151 | 491 | |
| 1912 | — | #156 | 380 | |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | #152 | 220 |
| 1910 | — | #158 | 197 | |
| 1909 | — | #166 | 147 | |
| 1908 | — | #155 | 152 | |
| 1907 | — | #174 | 124 | |
| 1906 | — | #150 | 136 | |
| 1905 | — | #177 | 107 | |
| 1904 | — | #185 | 97 | |
| 1903 | — | #166 | 102 | |
| 1902 | — | #167 | 104 | |
| 1901 | — | #167 | 89 | |
| 1900 | — | #161 | 130 | |
| 1899 | — | #150 | 101 | |
| 1898 | — | #135 | 133 | |
| 1897 | — | #156 | 100 | |
| 1896 | — | #136 | 123 | |
| 1895 | — | #139 | 112 | |
| 1894 | — | #131 | 124 | |
| 1893 | — | #138 | 108 | |
| 1892 | — | #128 | 132 | |
| 1891 | — | #122 | 113 | |
| 1890 | — | #164 | 86 | |
| 1889 | — | #118 | 118 | |
| 1888 | — | #136 | 114 | |
| 1887 | — | #123 | 108 | |
| 1886 | — | #123 | 112 | |
| 1885 | — | #123 | 111 | |
| 1884 | — | #123 | 117 | |
| 1883 | — | #152 | 86 | |
| 1882 | — | #127 | 109 | |
| 1881 | — | #154 | 80 | |
| 1880 | — | #116 | 113 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Matthew was already there! It came in at #116, and was given to 113 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1891, when fewer than 120 boys a year got the name.
Where Matthew is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Delaware#37 · 1 in 176
- Connecticut#39 · 1 in 183
- Vermont#40 · 1 in 149
- Alaska#40 · 1 in 169
- New Hampshire#40 · 1 in 169
Best ever in a state: #1 in South Dakota, 1979.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #37 | 29 | 1 in 176 |
| Connecticut | #39 | 146 | 1 in 183 |
| Alaska | #40 | 19 | 1 in 169 |
| New Hampshire | #40 | 36 | 1 in 169 |
| Vermont | #40 | 26 | 1 in 149 |
| Massachusetts | #42 | 263 | 1 in 217 |
| New Jersey | #43 | 291 | 1 in 213 |
| New York | #43 | 820 | 1 in 219 |
| District of Columbia | #44 | 66 | 1 in 226 |
| Michigan | #44 | 501 | 1 in 188 |
| Pennsylvania | #46 | 490 | 1 in 245 |
| Maryland | #47 | 122 | 1 in 269 |
| Washington | #47 | 158 | 1 in 196 |
| California | #48 | 811 | 1 in 229 |
| Rhode Island | #50 | 34 | 1 in 265 |
| Ohio | #51 | 458 | 1 in 245 |
| Illinois | #55 | 413 | 1 in 280 |
| Missouri | #56 | 193 | 1 in 253 |
| Colorado | #58 | 90 | 1 in 237 |
| Maine | #58 | 40 | 1 in 273 |
| Oregon | #58 | 81 | 1 in 223 |
| Iowa | #61 | 130 | 1 in 240 |
| Indiana | #62 | 182 | 1 in 298 |
| Wisconsin | #63 | 161 | 1 in 299 |
| Wyoming | #68 | 14 | 1 in 242 |
| Arizona | #69 | 59 | 1 in 288 |
| Minnesota | #74 | 116 | 1 in 366 |
| Nebraska | #78 | 46 | 1 in 354 |
| West Virginia | #80 | 49 | 1 in 387 |
| Montana | #85 | 23 | 1 in 331 |
| Hawaii | #86 | 23 | 1 in 316 |
| New Mexico | #87 | 40 | 1 in 343 |
| Nevada | #90 | 8 | 1 in 360 |
| Kansas | #93 | 54 | 1 in 425 |
| Florida | #96 | 123 | 1 in 446 |
| Idaho | #97 | 19 | 1 in 393 |
| Utah | #97 | 32 | 1 in 380 |
| Oklahoma | #103 | 52 | 1 in 457 |
| Virginia | #105 | 80 | 1 in 528 |
| Kentucky | #109 | 55 | 1 in 645 |
| Louisiana | #115 | 86 | 1 in 491 |
| North Dakota | #115 | 13 | 1 in 568 |
| South Carolina | #135 | 43 | 1 in 660 |
| Tennessee | #137 | 46 | 1 in 858 |
| Texas | #142 | 185 | 1 in 663 |
| Arkansas | #147 | 25 | 1 in 772 |
| North Carolina | #156 | 59 | 1 in 884 |
| Georgia | #180 | 49 | 1 in 984 |
| South Dakota | #184 | 6 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Alabama | #189 | 36 | 1 in 1,050 |
| Mississippi | #192 | 24 | 1 in 1,120 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Matthew
- 1 spot since 2024 (#33 → #32)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#30 → #32)
- 17 spots since 2015 (#15 → #32)
- Biggest jump: 42 spots in 1891 (#164 → #122)
- Biggest drop: 46 spots in 1890 (#118 → #164)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1995 at #2 (32,882 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: 37 yrs · run 1972–2008
- Top 100: 70 yrs · run 1956–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 36 boys born in 1983 were named Matthew (2.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 244 boys born in 2025 (0.41%)
- Its best rank, #2 in 1995, was only 1 in 58 (1.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 27.7% of all boys named Matthew (458,951) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,068 | #116 (1880) | #130 |
| 1890s | 1,132 | #122 (1891) | #140 |
| 1900s | 1,188 | #150 (1906) | #167 |
| 1910s | 6,228 | #148 (1918) | #152 |
| 1920s | 8,566 | #151 (1920) | #172 |
| 1930s | 6,255 | #188 (1932) | #201 |
| 1940s | 8,760 | #176 (1949) | #193 |
| 1950s | 35,796 | #60 (1958) | #113 |
| 1960s | 105,938 | #24 (1969) | #42 |
| 1970s | 277,727 | #6 (1979) | #11 |
| 1980s | 458,951 | #3 (1983) | #3 |
| 1990s | 351,682 | #2 (1995) | #3 |
| 2000s | 221,631 | #3 (2000) | #6 |
| 2010s | 125,101 | #12 (2011) | #16 |
| 2020s | 44,052 | #30 (2020) | #34 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Matthew in 1960
Top girls' names in 1960
Top boys' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 183,813 of them was named Matthew, which outranked 46.5% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,688Winnifred12
- #3,688Yetta12
- #3,688Zenda12
- #3,920Matthew11
- #3,920Adrina11
- #3,920Albina11
- #3,920Alejandrina11
- #4,184Adair10
- #4,184Adaline10
- #4,184Adena10
Tied with 263 names at #3,920; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,132,320 boys got a published name in 1960; 1 in 308 of them was named Matthew, which outranked 98.7% of the 4,598 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.