Max
#3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births · #180 for boys in 2025, 2,025 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2011 · 3,956 births
- Debut · boys
- 52 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 167,458since 1880
Max over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,645 | 41 | #180 | 2,025 |
| 2024 | #3,459 | 45 | #175 | 2,126 |
| 2023 | #2,442 | 73 | #163 | 2,205 |
| 2022 | #3,123 | 52 | #157 | 2,389 |
| 2021 | #3,069 | 53 | #160 | 2,410 |
| 2020 | #2,441 | 71 | #147 | 2,486 |
| 2019 | #4,773 | 28 | #137 | 2,755 |
| 2018 | #2,928 | 56 | #136 | 2,878 |
| 2017 | #3,627 | 42 | #128 | 3,145 |
| 2016 | #3,060 | 54 | #118 | 3,423 |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 | #117 | 3,422 |
| 2014 | #8,053 | 14 | #112 | 3,497 |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | #111 | 3,520 |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | #105 | 3,697 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #96 | 3,956 |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #98 | 3,848 |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | #104 | 3,958 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | #126 | 3,372 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 | #141 | 2,882 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #160 | 2,643 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #165 | 2,494 |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 | #164 | 2,481 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #162 | 2,460 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #166 | 2,319 |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | #159 | 2,404 |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | #164 | 2,355 |
| 1999 | — | #161 | 2,297 | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #159 | 2,158 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #194 | 1,698 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | #208 | 1,489 |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | #195 | 1,565 |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #191 | 1,624 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #169 | 1,888 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | #170 | 1,877 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | #175 | 1,829 |
| 1990 | — | #171 | 1,791 | |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #185 | 1,606 |
| 1988 | #4,840 | 17 | #197 | 1,386 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #188 | 1,452 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #243 | 923 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #274 | 762 |
| 1984 | — | #308 | 632 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #342 | 531 |
| 1982 | — | #375 | 462 | |
| 1981 | — | #351 | 501 | |
| 1980 | — | #362 | 486 | |
| 1979 | — | #375 | 457 | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #382 | 414 |
| 1977 | — | #392 | 403 | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #381 | 410 |
| 1975 | — | #381 | 415 | |
| 1974 | — | #381 | 413 | |
| 1973 | — | #368 | 434 | |
| 1972 | — | #396 | 390 | |
| 1971 | — | #402 | 409 | |
| 1970 | — | #368 | 486 | |
| 1969 | — | #410 | 375 | |
| 1968 | — | #382 | 414 | |
| 1967 | — | #377 | 395 | |
| 1966 | — | #355 | 448 | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #376 | 422 |
| 1964 | — | #343 | 525 | |
| 1963 | — | #335 | 549 | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | #328 | 573 |
| 1961 | — | #304 | 653 | |
| 1960 | — | #297 | 669 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #299 | 691 |
| 1958 | — | #283 | 736 | |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #279 | 740 |
| 1956 | — | #265 | 748 | |
| 1955 | — | #255 | 724 | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #259 | 743 |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #257 | 725 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #244 | 763 |
| 1951 | #4,833 | 6 | #238 | 805 |
| 1950 | — | #240 | 755 | |
| 1949 | — | #234 | 761 | |
| 1948 | — | #236 | 743 | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #218 | 869 |
| 1946 | — | #204 | 841 | |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #189 | 803 |
| 1944 | — | #194 | 780 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #186 | 875 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #170 | 971 |
| 1941 | — | #169 | 931 | |
| 1940 | — | #165 | 952 | |
| 1939 | — | #162 | 979 | |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #140 | 1,164 |
| 1937 | — | #141 | 1,106 | |
| 1936 | — | #129 | 1,248 | |
| 1935 | #2,731 | 10 | #128 | 1,283 |
| 1934 | #3,159 | 8 | #126 | 1,335 |
| 1933 | #2,404 | 12 | #140 | 1,124 |
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 | #143 | 1,154 |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | #140 | 1,183 |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | #143 | 1,181 |
| 1929 | #2,437 | 13 | #128 | 1,336 |
| 1928 | #2,623 | 12 | #125 | 1,405 |
| 1927 | #2,699 | 12 | #142 | 1,227 |
| 1926 | #3,046 | 10 | #137 | 1,254 |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | #128 | 1,385 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #126 | 1,397 |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 | #122 | 1,440 |
| 1922 | #2,479 | 14 | #117 | 1,518 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | #112 | 1,558 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 | #112 | 1,561 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | #110 | 1,458 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #106 | 1,536 |
| 1917 | #3,713 | 7 | #104 | 1,511 |
| 1916 | — | #105 | 1,493 | |
| 1915 | — | #102 | 1,434 | |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #99 | 1,159 |
| 1913 | — | #101 | 897 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #101 | 734 |
| 1911 | — | #106 | 360 | |
| 1910 | — | #114 | 277 | |
| 1909 | — | #122 | 228 | |
| 1908 | — | #119 | 218 | |
| 1907 | — | #122 | 197 | |
| 1906 | — | #132 | 156 | |
| 1905 | — | #149 | 140 | |
| 1904 | — | #145 | 134 | |
| 1903 | — | #159 | 110 | |
| 1902 | — | #142 | 133 | |
| 1901 | — | #146 | 110 | |
| 1900 | — | #149 | 141 | |
| 1899 | — | #125 | 127 | |
| 1898 | — | #136 | 132 | |
| 1897 | — | #133 | 122 | |
| 1896 | — | #120 | 145 | |
| 1895 | — | #165 | 95 | |
| 1894 | — | #155 | 99 | |
| 1893 | — | #139 | 107 | |
| 1892 | — | #166 | 95 | |
| 1891 | — | #145 | 91 | |
| 1890 | — | #143 | 99 | |
| 1889 | — | #160 | 83 | |
| 1888 | — | #132 | 118 | |
| 1887 | — | #174 | 73 | |
| 1886 | — | #182 | 73 | |
| 1885 | — | #183 | 71 | |
| 1884 | — | #176 | 80 | |
| 1883 | — | #163 | 75 | |
| 1882 | — | #182 | 74 | |
| 1881 | — | #175 | 66 | |
| 1880 | — | #225 | 52 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Max was already there! It came in at #225, and was given to 52 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 76 boys a year got the name.
Where Max is popular in 2022
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#43 · 1 in 163
- Utah#82 · 1 in 357
- Vermont#84 · 1 in 217
- Rhode Island#88 · 1 in 283
- Massachusetts#90 · 1 in 359
Best ever in a state: #13 in Utah, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #43 | 19 | 1 in 163 |
| Utah | #82 | 53 | 1 in 357 |
| Vermont | #84 | 6 | 1 in 217 |
| Rhode Island | #88 | 12 | 1 in 283 |
| Massachusetts | #90 | 77 | 1 in 359 |
| New York | #96 | 197 | 1 in 443 |
| New Jersey | #102 | 96 | 1 in 424 |
| Minnesota | #111 | 57 | 1 in 437 |
| Delaware | #112 | 10 | 1 in 320 |
| Connecticut | #114 | 34 | 1 in 410 |
| Idaho | #117 | 18 | 1 in 446 |
| California | #123 | 327 | 1 in 578 |
| South Dakota | #128 | 10 | 1 in 366 |
| Washington | #128 | 65 | 1 in 511 |
| New Hampshire | #132 | 11 | 1 in 398 |
| Nebraska | #140 | 19 | 1 in 456 |
| Maryland | #143 | 45 | 1 in 552 |
| Colorado | #144 | 46 | 1 in 553 |
| Hawaii | #145 | 8 | 1 in 410 |
| Illinois | #149 | 88 | 1 in 588 |
| Iowa | #151 | 25 | 1 in 558 |
| Oregon | #156 | 26 | 1 in 588 |
| Florida | #159 | 146 | 1 in 653 |
| Pennsylvania | #160 | 86 | 1 in 623 |
| Indiana | #162 | 53 | 1 in 608 |
| New Mexico | #165 | 12 | 1 in 555 |
| Nevada | #166 | 20 | 1 in 581 |
| North Dakota | #167 | 7 | 1 in 491 |
| Oklahoma | #170 | 29 | 1 in 612 |
| Wisconsin | #171 | 35 | 1 in 676 |
| Missouri | #175 | 43 | 1 in 651 |
| Virginia | #179 | 50 | 1 in 768 |
| Maine | #185 | 7 | 1 in 579 |
| Tennessee | #190 | 44 | 1 in 816 |
| Michigan | #193 | 54 | 1 in 769 |
| Ohio | #196 | 65 | 1 in 817 |
| Montana | #199 | 6 | 1 in 566 |
| North Carolina | #200 | 62 | 1 in 822 |
| Kansas | #203 | 18 | 1 in 759 |
| Louisiana | #206 | 27 | 1 in 790 |
| Arizona | #207 | 41 | 1 in 796 |
| Texas | #220 | 190 | 1 in 941 |
| Alabama | #230 | 24 | 1 in 918 |
| Georgia | #244 | 51 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Kentucky | #264 | 19 | 1 in 1,041 |
| South Carolina | #264 | 20 | 1 in 1,025 |
| West Virginia | #267 | 7 | 1 in 957 |
| Arkansas | #298 | 12 | 1 in 1,051 |
| Mississippi | #412 | 7 | 1 in 1,647 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Max
- 5 spots since 2024 (#175 → #180)
- 33 spots since 2020 (#147 → #180)
- 63 spots since 2015 (#117 → #180)
- Biggest jump: 55 spots in 1987 (#243 → #188)
- Biggest drop: 34 spots in 1971 (#368 → #402)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2011 at #96 (3,956 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 2010–2011
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 480 boys born in 2011 were named Max (0.21%)
- Latest: 1 in 843 boys born in 2025 (0.12%)
- 20.4% of all boys named Max (34,141) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 765 | #132 (1888) | #175 |
| 1890s | 1,112 | #120 (1896) | #143 |
| 1900s | 1,567 | #119 (1908) | #139 |
| 1910s | 10,859 | #99 (1914) | #105 |
| 1920s | 14,081 | #112 (1920) | #125 |
| 1930s | 11,757 | #126 (1934) | #139 |
| 1940s | 8,526 | #165 (1940) | #197 |
| 1950s | 7,430 | #238 (1951) | #262 |
| 1960s | 5,023 | #297 (1960) | #351 |
| 1970s | 4,231 | #368 (1970) | #383 |
| 1980s | 8,741 | #185 (1989) | #283 |
| 1990s | 18,216 | #159 (1998) | #179 |
| 2000s | 27,368 | #104 (2009) | #151 |
| 2010s | 34,141 | #96 (2011) | #116 |
| 2020s | 13,641 | #147 (2020) | #164 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Max in 2022
Top girls' names in 2022
Top boys' names in 2022
More about 2022
girls
1,640,131 girls got a published name in 2022; 1 in 31,541 of them was named Max, which outranked 82.4% of the 17,760 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,073Susannah53
- #3,073Vianney53
- #3,073Wynonna53
- #3,123Max52
- #3,123Aahana52
- #3,123Aanvi52
- #3,123Advika52
- #3,171Aaradhya51
- #3,171Abella51
- #3,171Adelin51
Tied with 47 names at #3,123; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,746,008 boys got a published name in 2022; 1 in 731 of them was named Max, which outranked 98.9% of the 14,333 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.