Maxx
- #13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- #1,753 for boys in 2025, 92 births
- Given to boys 97.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2010 · 210 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,078since 1980
Maxx over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Maxx has never cracked the top 900 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #1,753 | 92 |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #1,701 | 98 |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #2,441 | 55 |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #1,875 | 84 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #2,000 | 74 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #1,685 | 93 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #1,658 | 97 |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #1,498 | 115 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | #1,321 | 136 |
| 2016 | #10,113 | 10 | #1,159 | 165 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #1,141 | 165 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #1,057 | 187 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #1,070 | 175 |
| 2012 | — | #1,027 | 190 | |
| 2011 | — | #967 | 204 | |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #953 | 210 |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #958 | 210 |
| 2008 | — | #1,019 | 188 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,621 | 95 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,605 | 90 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,619 | 84 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,701 | 75 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,687 | 73 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,636 | 73 | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #1,600 | 74 |
| 2000 | — | #1,466 | 84 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,421 | 82 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,502 | 73 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,580 | 64 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,671 | 57 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,706 | 52 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,564 | 59 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,295 | 77 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,150 | 92 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,411 | 65 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,435 | 61 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,382 | 63 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,270 | 65 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,974 | 31 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,005 | 16 | |
| 1985 | — | #3,216 | 14 | |
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1980
The first year at least five boys were named Maxx! It came in at #4,495, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1982–1983, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Maxx is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- California#957 · 1 in 7,629
- Florida#1,478 · 1 in 13,648
- New York#1,576 · 1 in 14,070
Best ever in a state: #409 in Nebraska, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #957 | 23 | 1 in 7,629 |
| Florida | #1,478 | 7 | 1 in 13,648 |
| New York | #1,576 | 6 | 1 in 14,070 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maxx
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 68 spots since 2020 (#1,685 → #1,753)
- Biggest jump: 61 spots in 2009
- Biggest drop: 60 spots in 2012
Rise & fade · boys
30 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1980
- Peaked 2010 at #953 (210 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 3 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 3 yrs · run 2009–2011
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,137
- Highest: 1 in 9,137 boys born in 2010 were named Maxx (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,566 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 40.3% of all boys named Maxx (1,644) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 210 | #1,270 (1988) | #3,233 |
| 1990s | 682 | #1,150 (1992) | #1,474 |
| 2000s | 1,046 | #958 (2009) | #1,491 |
| 2010s | 1,644 | #953 (2010) | #1,185 |
| 2020s | 496 | #1,685 (2020) | #1,909 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Maxx ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: