Mckenley
- #11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births
- Last seen for boys in 2010 at #10,766
- Given to girls 88.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 35 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 307since 1998
Mckenley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | — | |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | — | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 | — | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | — | |
| 2017 | #7,840 | 14 | — | |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | — | |
| 2015 | #7,266 | 16 | — | |
| 2014 | #8,966 | 12 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,110 | 21 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,358 | 25 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,180 | 35 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,529 | 14 | — | |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | — | |
| 2006 | #10,611 | 10 | — | |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | — | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | #3,741 | 6 | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #3,815 | 6 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1998
The first year at least five girls were named Mckenley! It came in at #12,426, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2002–2003, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Mckenley is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Mckenley in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Mckenley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 229 spots since 2024 (#12,161 → #11,932)
- 1,521 spots since 2020 (#13,453 → #11,932)
- 4,666 spots since 2015 (#7,266 → #11,932)
Rise & fade · girls
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1998
- Peaked 2010 at #4,180 (35 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 50,788
- Highest: 1 in 50,788 girls born in 2010 were named Mckenley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 229,610 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 59.3% of all girls named Mckenley (182) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1999
- Mostly boys until 1998, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12 | #12,426 (1998) | #12,557 |
| 2000s | 80 | #7,679 (2009) | #11,837 |
| 2010s | 182 | #4,180 (2010) | #7,292 |
| 2020s | 33 | #11,932 (2025) | #12,650 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mckenley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: