Mckinnley
- #8,362 for girls in 2025, 12 births
- Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
- Given to girls 87.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 42 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 506since 1994
Mckinnley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,362 | 12 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 | — | |
| 2023 | #8,055 | 13 | — | |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 | — | |
| 2021 | #7,630 | 14 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,923 | 16 | — | |
| 2019 | #6,698 | 17 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,619 | 22 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,915 | 38 | — | |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,143 | 26 | — | |
| 2012 | #5,253 | 26 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,659 | 42 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #4,107 | 36 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,317 | 21 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | #9,476 | 12 | — | |
| 2007 | #9,539 | 12 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #7,142 | 17 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | — | #10,556 | 5 | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #7,792 | 6 | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1994
The first year at least five girls were named Mckinnley! It came in at #11,778, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1997, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Mckinnley is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Mckinnley in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Mckinnley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 1,430 spots since 2024 (#6,932 → #8,362)
- 1,439 spots since 2020 (#6,923 → #8,362)
- 4,447 spots since 2015 (#3,915 → #8,362)
Rise & fade · girls
17 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1994
- Peaked 2011 at #3,659 (42 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 41,883
- Highest: 1 in 41,883 girls born in 2011 were named Mckinnley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 133,939 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 55.3% of all girls named Mckinnley (280) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2002
- Mostly boys until 2001, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31 | #7,239 (1999) | #8,850 |
| 2000s | 117 | #6,317 (2009) | #8,862 |
| 2010s | 280 | #3,659 (2011) | #5,093 |
| 2020s | 78 | #6,923 (2020) | #8,358 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mckinnley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: